Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2020-11-07 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 16:26 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Thread is old, but makes me wonder, is there any current status on Qt with > Wayland? > > In F33 with GNOME Workstation, several Qt applications don't work correctly > with Wayland, but do work if switching to Xorg. > > avidemux-qt, for

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2020-11-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
Thread is old, but makes me wonder, is there any current status on Qt with Wayland? In F33 with GNOME Workstation, several Qt applications don't work correctly with Wayland, but do work if switching to Xorg. avidemux-qt, for example, displays a video preview area that doesn't update. Audacious 4

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-11 Thread mario futire
Re geometry: > Hi, > > As I told you in the bug above, I believe this a Wayland limitation. > you are probably right. So in wayland (weston, plasma & gnome) position is lost but size is save X11, position and size are saved ___ users mailing list -- u

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Andy Paterson via users wrote: > Just to make a point, i have always disliked gnome & ever since it first > appeared have used kde on fedora, if qt support in fedora becomes broken, > i for one will ditch fedora Your point is based on a false premise, so no worries. -- rex __

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-09 Thread Jan Grulich
Hi, I will repeat myself even here. > I am developing a Qt app in Fedora 31 using the default GNOME wayland session > and I am > very sorry to see the state of Qt in this configuration. > > 1) qt creator crashes often > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773356) the > crash report t

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-09 Thread Andy Paterson via users
Just to make a point, i have always disliked gnome & ever since it first appeared have used kde on fedora, if qt support in fedora becomes broken, i for one will ditch fedora > On 9 Dec 2019, at 13:05, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 12:40 +, mario futire wrote: > >

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-09 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 12:40 +, mario futire wrote: [When replying via HyperKitty, please quote the text you are commenting on. Unlike standard email clients, HK doesn't do this automatically, and most members of this list use email, not HK] > Sorry about a mistake, the default desktop is inde

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-09 Thread mario futire
Sorry about a mistake, the default desktop is indeed Gnome - Wayland (no Qt here, mistake) but if one uses a Qt-based app, then all these issues are very real. So Gnome - Wayland is ok, as long as Qt apps are *not* used. The issues is not in KDE, but somewhere between Mutter - Wayland - Qt. Fed

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-09 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 08:58 +, mario futire wrote: > I am developing a Qt app in Fedora 31 using the default GNOME wayland session > and I am very sorry to see the state of Qt in this configuration. > > 1) qt creator crashes often > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773356) the c

The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

2019-12-09 Thread mario futire
I am developing a Qt app in Fedora 31 using the default GNOME wayland session and I am very sorry to see the state of Qt in this configuration. 1) qt creator crashes often (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773356) the crash report tool does not seem to help 2) drag & drop does not w