Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-27 Thread Genes MailLists
On 06/27/2010 05:37 PM, Remi Collet wrote: >> You are correct, I stand corrected. The enigmain main page only states >> 32-bit, but when you click on the download page you can get the 64-bit >> version. > > addons.mozilla only provides extensions for official package. > And mozilla only provides 3

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-27 Thread Remi Collet
> You are correct, I stand corrected. The enigmain main page only states > 32-bit, but when you click on the download page you can get the 64-bit > version. addons.mozilla only provides extensions for official package. And mozilla only provides 32 bits build of Firefox. All 64 bits package are on

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-27 Thread Steven Stern
o rpmfusion before 2 issues ware fixed : > - version is displayed as 1.1 > - thunberdird refuse to start more than once (the big one) > > See comment > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sunbird-1.0-0.25.b2pre.fc13,thunderbird-3.1-1.fc13 > > + > > P.S. I will appreci

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-27 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 06/27/2010 11:13 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/27/2010 10:59 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: >>> maybe you should have a look at; >>> >>>http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news/index.php >>> >>> >> I was just curious to see if I could get T-Bird and enigmail to ignore >> the version warning. AFAIK, e

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-27 Thread Genes MailLists
On 06/27/2010 10:59 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: >> >> maybe you should have a look at; >> >>http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news/index.php >> >> > I was just curious to see if I could get T-Bird and enigmail to ignore > the version warning. AFAIK, enigmail has never really supported 64-bits. > The only

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-27 Thread Jerry Feldman
do not > have a 64 bit version for thunderbird 3.1 64 bit yet. > > maybe you should have a look at; > >http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news/index.php > > I was just curious to see if I could get T-Bird and enigmail to ignore the version warning. AFAIK, enigmail has never really s

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-26 Thread g
Jerry Feldman wrote: > I'm running 64-bit 3.1 with enigmail 1.01 with no problem. interesting. [note link below] 1.01? or do you mean 1.0.1? makes me wonder why enigmail folks came out with enigmail 1.1.1 and do not have a 64 bit version for thunderbird 3.1 64 bit yet. maybe you sho

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-26 Thread Remi Collet
nt https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sunbird-1.0-0.25.b2pre.fc13,thunderbird-3.1-1.fc13 + P.S. I will appreciate other feedback about the bug I describe in the update comment - others users affected ? (or am I the only one) - others languages (only in french ? only in non-english ? all ?) -

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Stern
it of trying to reproduce the > problem without introducing additional variables. > > > If I can get in a word edgewise... I removed the tarball from Mozilla, installed Thunderbird 3.1 from updates-testing, and updated enigmail to 1.1.1 from the addons "look for updates" but

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-26 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 06/26/2010 01:17 AM, g wrote: > Ed Greshko wrote: > > >> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1. >> >> Works fine on F13 under KDE. > did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/? > > enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1? I'm running 64-bit 3.1 with enigmail 1.01 with no pro

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2010 02:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> >> I don't use that repository...so it is meaningless to me. :-) >> > Your call, but you don't need to have it enabled permanently (I don't). > Just do: > > yum --enablerepo=updat

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/26/2010 02:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > >> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version > >> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ...

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2010 02:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version >> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-) >> > TB 3.1 has been pushed to updates-testing. > > >

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread g
Ed Greshko wrote: > Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version > available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-) ok. i have not installed f13 or reinstalled f12 yet, i was not able to check versions and did not recall what was being used. i use scientific linux 5

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version > available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-) TB 3.1 has been pushed to updates-testing. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe o

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Ed Greshko
>>> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/? >>> >>> >> /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird >> > interesting. > > was that a 'yum' from fedora, or did you pull from mozilla? > Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version available via the F13 reposit

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread g
Ed Greshko wrote: >> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/? >> > /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird interesting. was that a 'yum' from fedora, or did you pull from mozilla? if yum, did you redirect it? if pulled from mozilla, that was default? >> enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1? >> > 1.1.1

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Remi Collet
Le 26/06/2010 05:39, Steven Stern a écrit : > Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1? > > I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version > 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is > installed, f

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2010 01:17 PM, g wrote: > >> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1. >> >> Works fine on F13 under KDE. >> > did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/? > /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird > enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1? > 1.1.1 -- Happiness isn't

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread g
Ed Greshko wrote: > I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1. > > Works fine on F13 under KDE. did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/? enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1? > > Ed > > -- peace out. tc,hago. g . in a free world without fences, who needs ga

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2010 11:39 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1? > > I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version > 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is > installed, f

Re: Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread g
Steven Stern wrote: > Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1? > > I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version > 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is > installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0

Thunderbird 3.1 and enigmail

2010-06-25 Thread Steven Stern
Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1? I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2.fc13.i686 -- -- Steve -- users ma

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-20 Thread Genes MailLists
On 06/20/2010 11:05 AM, David Boles wrote: > On 6/20/2010 4:53 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Does this help with your problem? > > Nightly Tester Tools Lite 0.2.2 > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/1391/ > Ahhh that makes sense .. :-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedo

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-20 Thread David Boles
On 6/20/2010 4:53 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 06/19/10 23:56, Genes MailLists wrote: >> On 06/19/2010 04:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> >> yes a little but there's a few 686 libs that need to be installed and >> it works fine thereafter. > > ... but not all addons run correctly, and some run not

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-20 Thread Genes MailLists
On 06/20/2010 04:53 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 06/19/10 23:56, Genes MailLists wrote: >> On 06/19/2010 04:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> yes a little but there's a few 686 libs that need to be installed and >> it works fine thereafter. > > ... but not all addons run correctly, and some run not

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-20 Thread Joachim Backes
On 06/19/10 23:56, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 06/19/2010 04:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> On Saturday 19 June 2010 08:55 AM, mike cloaked wrote: >>> Then download the tarball of the version you are interested in - for >>> example: >>> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread Genes MailLists
On 06/19/2010 04:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Saturday 19 June 2010 08:55 AM, mike cloaked wrote: >> Then download the tarball of the version you are interested in - for example: >> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/3.1rc2/linux-i686/en-GB/thunderbird-3.1rc2.tar.bz2

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Saturday 19 June 2010 08:55 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > Then download the tarball of the version you are interested in - for example: > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/3.1rc2/linux-i686/en-GB/thunderbird-3.1rc2.tar.bz2 This is bit of a problem on 64 bit installati

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread mike cloaked
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 06/19/2010 07:59 PM, Steven Stern wrote: >>> I see that Thunderbird 3.1 RC2 is in the rawhide repository.  When >>> Thunderbird 3.1 is release, will it

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread mike cloaked
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/19/2010 07:59 PM, Steven Stern wrote: >> I see that Thunderbird 3.1 RC2 is in the rawhide repository.  When >> Thunderbird 3.1 is release, will it become part of Fedora 13 or will it >> be held until Fedora 14?

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/19/2010 07:59 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > I see that Thunderbird 3.1 RC2 is in the rawhide repository. When > Thunderbird 3.1 is release, will it become part of Fedora 13 or will it > be held until Fedora 14? > > It appears that 3.1 is faster and more reliable than 3.0.4.

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 06/19/2010 10:29 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > I see that Thunderbird 3.1 RC2 is in the rawhide repository. When > Thunderbird 3.1 is release, will it become part of Fedora 13 or will it > be held until Fedora 14? I wouldn't hold my breath unless you see it in F13 updates-tes

Thunderbird 3.1

2010-06-19 Thread Steven Stern
I see that Thunderbird 3.1 RC2 is in the rawhide repository. When Thunderbird 3.1 is release, will it become part of Fedora 13 or will it be held until Fedora 14? It appears that 3.1 is faster and more reliable than 3.0.4. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To