On 11/28/2011 02:08 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 10:58 AM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
>> Well, I'm sure that some folks are of the opinion that the GNOME developers
>> attitudes and responses to user concerns are pretty fascist.
> Only those who use the term as a generic insult and haven't the
On 11/29/2011 12:35 AM, Matt Rose wrote:
>> Sorry POC for inserting here.
>>
>> I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
>> resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
>> recurring themes.
> I realize nothing can be done about the meta "Guidelines"
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 11:15 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 28.11.2011 09:12, schrieb les:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> in business-communication top posting and TOFU is normally
> >> because with TOFU you need only the last mail of a conversation
> >> and wi
On 11/28/2011 10:58 AM, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
> Well, I'm sure that some folks are of the opinion that the GNOME developers
> attitudes and responses to user concerns are pretty fascist.
Only those who use the term as a generic insult and haven't the
slightest idea what it means.
--
users mail
On 11/28/2011 01:49 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 05:30 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> The only thing missing is the confirmation of the Godwin's law. :-D
> Well, the number of people hating Gnome proves that Ugol's Law still
> works. Now, all we need is an example of Cole's Law
Well, I'm su
On 11/28/2011 05:30 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> The only thing missing is the confirmation of the Godwin's law. :-D
Well, the number of people hating Gnome proves that Ugol's Law still
works. Now, all we need is an example of Cole's Law.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
> Sorry POC for inserting here.
>
> I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
> resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
> recurring themes.
I realize nothing can be done about the meta "Guidelines" thrash, but you
know, some would say that if s
On Monday 28 November 2011 20:03:02 Ed Greshko wrote:
> Sorry POC for inserting here.
>
> I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
> resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
> recurring themes.
>
>
>
> A. GNOME 3 is the most hated desktop
Sorry POC for inserting here.
I just want to congratulate all the participants in this thread and
resulting tangents. You've manged to hit at least 3 most often
recurring themes.
A. GNOME 3 is the most hated desktop since the introduction of KDE 4.
B. Licensing in Fedora. Or: Why c
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 21:49 +1100, Roger wrote:
> Also consider that with several contributors commenting on the same
> post it gets boring scrolling down each one through the same
> information
> Roger
That's why you edit. Whatever posting style you use, you need to edit.
You can't keep every si
Am 28.11.2011 12:47, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> 1) Business mail top-posts and quotes everything because that's the way
> Outlook works and to a significant percentage of business users
> "Outlook"and "Email" are synonyms. The single advantage to doing it this
> way is that you can shovel over
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 21:49 +1100, Roger wrote:
> Also consider that with several contributors commenting on the same
> post
> it gets boring scrolling down each one through the same information
It gets even more boring when posters can't be bothered to trim the
stuff they're quoting. If quotes w
Also consider that with several contributors commenting on the same post
it gets boring scrolling down each one through the same information
Roger
in business-communication top posting and TOFU is normally
because with TOFU you need only the last mail of a conversation
and with the top-posting y
Am 28.11.2011 09:12, schrieb les:
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> in business-communication top posting and TOFU is normally
>> because with TOFU you need only the last mail of a conversation
>> and with the top-posting you need not to scroll and see the whole
>> answ
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:12:14 -0800
les wrote:
I love this mlist more and more!
all started with Fedora - time to blink and now we are behind this "querelle"
that is older than internet ;)
you are amazing, guys :)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscri
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:00 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
> >> Let's see the rant's now.
> >
> > A. Because people read from top to bo
> | But side posting is more fun = It
> | and by far a more interesting = certainly
> | challenge, isn't it? = is
> |= more
> | {O,o} Ack! = challenging
> > -- = with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/27/2011 06:28 PM, jdow wrote:
> On 2011/11/27 15:42, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> Well, considering that top posting | But side posting is more fun
> > is strongly discourages in the | and by far a more interesting
>> list guidelines,
On 2011/11/27 15:42, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 01:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
>>>
>>> A. Because people read from top to bottom.
>>> Q. Why should I not top post?
>>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally r
On 11/27/2011 01:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
>>
>> A. Because people read from top to bottom.
>> Q. Why should I not top post?
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
On Sunday 27 November 2011 20:00:20 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> > A. Because people read from top to bottom.
> > Q. Why should I not top post?
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad th
On 11/27/2011 12:13 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/11/11 17:08, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Possibly so someone can say
>> "It's not bloated, you installed all that stuff"
>>
>> Please get your attributions right. There's n
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:00:20 -0600 Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
> > Frank Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
> >> Let's see the rant's now.
> >
> > A. Because people read from top
Am 27.11.2011 19:32, schrieb Maurizio Marini:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
>> Let's see the rant's now.
>
> A. Because people read from top to bottom.
> Q. Why should I not top post?
> A: Because it messes up the order
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:13:53 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
> That's what top-posting brings. (Not JZ)
> Let's see the rant's now.
A. Because people read from top to bottom.
Q. Why should I not top post?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such
On 27/11/11 17:08, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> Possibly so someone can say
> "It's not bloated, you installed all that stuff"
>
> Please get your attributions right. There's nothing of mine quoted here.
That's what top-posting b
26 matches
Mail list logo
