Steve Underwood wrote:
> The standard install on x86_64 puts both the x86_64 and i386/i686 versions
> of most libraries on the machine, to maximise compatibility with any 32
> bit executables you may install for yourself.
Actually no, it doesn't, it stopped doing that long ago. You get 32-bit
stu
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Currently wine is i686 only, so having that installed would be one way
> you could have ended up with some i686 packages installed.
It's actually both these days, but 64-bit WINE can only run 64-bit
executables, so the default wine metapackage will drag in both the 32-bit
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 18:05 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010 05:24:32 pm bruce wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM, William Case wrote:
> > > I am using a *fc12.x86_64 machine. I just now upgraded several packages
> > > with yum (yumex) and noticed several i686
On 02/28/2010 07:15 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Apparently
> version 7 doesn't have this problem anymore (but I didn't check this yet).
>
Ah could be .. I'm running 7 too.
g
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
On Sunday 28 February 2010 04:31:55 am Mail Lists wrote:
> On 02/27/2010 10:59 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >> I run F11 x86_64 and there are *zero* 32 bit libraries on my machine. I
> >> recently installed Mathematica from the Wolfram supplied binary for a
> >> friend. I however did not need to in
On 28/02/10 04:59 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010 09:21:35 pm Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On 27/02/10 07:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> ...
>>> version of it (yet). Later on I tainted it again when installing
>>> dependencies for Wolfram Mathematica package I use.
>>>
>>> If t
On 02/27/2010 10:59 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> I run F11 x86_64 and there are *zero* 32 bit libraries on my machine. I
>> recently installed Mathematica from the Wolfram supplied binary for a
>> friend. I however did not need to install any 32 bit dependencies. Are
>> you sure about their depen
On Saturday 27 February 2010 09:21:35 pm Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On 27/02/10 07:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > ...
> > version of it (yet). Later on I tainted it again when installing
> > dependencies for Wolfram Mathematica package I use.
> >
> > If there weren't for closed source software which d
On 27/02/10 07:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> ...
> version of it (yet). Later on I tainted it again when installing dependencies
> for Wolfram Mathematica package I use.
>
> If there weren't for closed source software which depends on 32bit libraries,
> I'd be having a clean 64bit-only system.
I
Hi;
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 18:05 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010 05:24:32 pm bruce wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM, William Case wrote:
> > > I am using a *fc12.x86_64 machine. I just now upgraded several packages
> > > with yum (yumex) and noticed several
On 02/28/2010 12:31 AM, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I am using a *fc12.x86_64 machine. I just now upgraded several packages
> with yum (yumex) and noticed several i686 packages being upgraded as
> well. Is this normal? Are some packages I have using i686 when I
> should have only *.86_64 on my
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 09:24 -0800, bruce wrote:
> leave them alone!!!
If everything you need/use is 64-bit, you can safely remove the i386
(i686) stuff from your system.
> as far as i know.. there is no true, only x64 OS from the redhat
> tree...
The default installation includes support for i3
On Saturday 27 February 2010 05:24:32 pm bruce wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM, William Case wrote:
> > I am using a *fc12.x86_64 machine. I just now upgraded several packages
> > with yum (yumex) and noticed several i686 packages being upgraded as
> > well. Is this normal? Are some pa
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:31:26 -0500,
William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I am using a *fc12.x86_64 machine. I just now upgraded several packages
> with yum (yumex) and noticed several i686 packages being upgraded as
> well. Is this normal? Are some packages I have using i686 when I
> should hav
leave them alone!!!
as far as i know.. there is no true, only x64 OS from the redhat
tree... although i think solaris has an actual tryu 64 bit OS...
the 64 bit OS linux from redhat (fedora/centos/rhel/etc.. ) comes with
a combination if i recall...
enjoy!!
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Wil
Hi;
I am using a *fc12.x86_64 machine. I just now upgraded several packages
with yum (yumex) and noticed several i686 packages being upgraded as
well. Is this normal? Are some packages I have using i686 when I
should have only *.86_64 on my machine? Should I remove ALL i686
packages or just le
16 matches
Mail list logo
