Re: VMware woes

> On Jan 12, 2024, at 20:59, Sherman Grunewagen via users > wrote: > > On 11/01/2024 13.48, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:36:32PM -0800, Sherman Grunewagen via users >>> wrote: >>> Hello all. >>> >>> Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any o

Re: VMware woes

On Sun, 2024-01-14 at 17:17 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > Tim: > > > Which I received base64 encoded, for reasons unfathomable. > > Dave Close: > > I wonder what did that. It wasn't sent that way: > >   Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >   Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit > > These days

Re: VMware woes

Tim: >> Which I received base64 encoded, for reasons unfathomable. Dave Close: > I wonder what did that. It wasn't sent that way: > Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit These days, 8-bit mail ought to be able to traverse the internet unscathed (not need

Re: VMware woes

On 12/01/2024 18.34, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/12/24 18:00, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: On 12/01/2024 17.58, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Yes, the popup explicitly says that the 6.6.9 headers are needed (as I'm running kernel-6.6.9). Here's a screenshot of the popup: 

Re: VMware woes

Tim via users wrote: >I wrote: >> Speaking of email clients modifying received messages ... >> >> {This message was not written in HTML. If you are reading it as such, >>  the presentation is dishonest and not what the author intended.} >Which I received base64 encoded, for reasons unfathomable.

Re: VMware woes

On Sun, 2024-01-14 at 08:29 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 21:33 -0800, Dave Close wrote: > > Speaking of email clients modifying received messages ... > > > > {This message was not written in HTML. If you are reading it as > > such, > >  the presentation is dishonest and not

Re: VMware woes

On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 21:33 -0800, Dave Close wrote: > Speaking of email clients modifying received messages ... > > {This message was not written in HTML. If you are reading it as such, >  the presentation is dishonest and not what the author intended.} Which I received base64 encoded, for reaso

Re: VMware woes

Samuel Sieb wrote: >Nothing to do with the list. That's your email client converting it. Speaking of email clients modifying received messages ... {This message was not written in HTML. If you are reading it as such, the presentation is dishonest and not what the author intended.} --

Re: VMware woes

On 1/12/24 18:00, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: On 12/01/2024 17.58, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Yes, the popup explicitly says that the 6.6.9 headers are needed (as I'm running kernel-6.6.9). Here's a screenshot of the popup:  . (I don't know how to

Re: VMware woes

On 12/01/2024 17.58, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: On 11/01/2024 13.48, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:36:32PM -0800, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Hello all. Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm havin

Re: VMware woes

On 11/01/2024 13.48, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:36:32PM -0800, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Hello all. Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fedora 38 installat

Re: VMware woes

On 2024-01-12 11:28, Sbob wrote: I am running Fedora 39 (Kernel 6.6.9-200) and VMWare workstation Pro 17.5.0 Here is what I do every time there is a new kernel: 1) run the dnf update and get the new kernel installed 2) reboot 3) open a terminal as root and run this script: #!/bin/bash VM

Re: VMware woes

I am running Fedora 39 (Kernel 6.6.9-200) and VMWare workstation Pro 17.5.0 Here is what I do every time there is a new kernel: 1) run the dnf update and get the new kernel installed 2) reboot 3) open a terminal as root and run this script: #!/bin/bash VMWARE_VERSION=workstation-17.5.0 TM

Re: VMware woes

> On 11 Jan 2024, at 02:43, Frank Bures wrote: > > You would not have to reinstall. Once you convert your VMWare disks to QEMU > disk and configure the QEMU virtual machine, it just boots the same way as it > used to in VMWare. That's the beauty of it. Yes this works well. I converted a wi

Re: VMware woes

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:36:32PM -0800, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: > Hello all. > > Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the > later 6.6.X kernels? > > I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fedora 38 > installation. I'm fully updated as of 2 day

Re: VMware woes

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:06 AM ja wrote: > > > I had host crashes with some kernels and just stayed with an older kernel. > The latest kernels are now working fine with WS 17.5.0 > It was really a kernel problem not a VMware problem. > See > https://github.com/mkubecek/vmware-host-modules/tree/ma

Re: VMware woes

On Wed, 2024-01-10 at 21:40 -0500, Frank Bures wrote: > On 2024-01-10 19:06, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 1/10/24 15:36, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: > > > Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the > > > later 6.6.X kernels? > > > > > > I'm having a hard time getti

Re: VMware woes

On 2024-01-10 21:03, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: On 10/01/2024 16.06, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/10/24 15:36, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fed

Re: VMware woes

On 2024-01-10 19:06, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/10/24 15:36, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fedora 38 installation.  I'm fully updated as of 2 days ago,

Re: VMware woes

On 10/01/2024 16.06, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/10/24 15:36, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fedora 38 installation.  I'm fully updated as of 2 days ago,

Re: VMware woes

edora users mailto:community%20support%20for%20fedora%20users%20%3cus...@lists.fedoraproject.org%3e>> *Aan*: fedora users mailto:fedora%20users%20%3cus...@lists.fedoraproject.org%3e>> *Cc*: Sherman Grunewagen mailto:sherman%20grunewagen%20%3csugarwa...@gmx.com%3e>> *Onderwerp*: VMwar

Re: VMware woes

On 1/10/24 15:36, Sherman Grunewagen via users wrote: Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fedora 38 installation.  I'm fully updated as of 2 days ago, including the 6.6.9 kernel.  When I try t

Re: VMware woes

Antwoord-naar: Community support for Fedora users Aan: fedora users Cc: Sherman Grunewagen Onderwerp: VMware woes Datum: 11.01.2024 00:36:32 Hello all. Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run w

VMware woes

Hello all. Does anyone have VMware Workstation Pro 17.5.0 running with any of the later 6.6.X kernels? I'm having a hard time getting it to run with a Fedora 38 installation. I'm fully updated as of 2 days ago, including the 6.6.9 kernel. When I try to start Workstation directly after VMware i