On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 06:44:05 +0200
Alek Paunov wrote:
> On 20.03.2012 20:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:37 +0200
> > Alek Paunov wrote:
> >
> >> Which is the proper way to vote and describe potential benefits of
> >> a new package, with candidate maintainer who needs sponso
On 20.03.2012 20:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:37 +0200
Alek Paunov wrote:
Which is the proper way to vote and describe potential benefits of a
new package, with candidate maintainer who needs sponsorship.
Voting for what?
For the package. As a Fedora user (not a package
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:12:37 +0200
Alek Paunov wrote:
> Which is the proper way to vote and describe potential benefits of a
> new package, with candidate maintainer who needs sponsorship.
Voting for what?
Maintainers that need sponsorship have to use one of the methods on:
http://fedoraproje
Which is the proper way to vote and describe potential benefits of a new
package, with candidate maintainer who needs sponsorship.
Thank you,
Alek
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
