On 26/07/17 03:46, Tom Horsley wrote:
That must be it! Thanks. It is bewildering for sure. I wonder who
has the weak dependency on bash-completion? It is such a dreadfully
broken mess, I wouldn't want anything suggesting it be used :-(.
One of the first things I remove too, along with
Package
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:29:09 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Do you have
> "install_weak_deps=false"
> in your
> /etc/dnf/dnf.conf?
>
> These bewildering, bizarre and confusing "conflict messages" are dnf's
> poor way to tell it did not install a packages with weak dependency :(
That must be it!
On 07/25/2017 01:30 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Almost the very first thing I do on a new install is to
erase bash-completion, and it is indeed not installed:
tomh> rpm -q bash-completion
package bash-completion is not installed
So why did the dnf-automatic run I have in cron
tell me this last night
Almost the very first thing I do on a new install is to
erase bash-completion, and it is indeed not installed:
tomh> rpm -q bash-completion
package bash-completion is not installed
So why did the dnf-automatic run I have in cron
tell me this last night:
Delta RPMs reduced 80.7 MB of updates to 3
