Arora has just crashed. SELinux reports that I may be under
attack and should report. I'm guessing it's a lot more likely SELinux is
being needlessly paranoid. (I'm running F17, fully updated, and arora had
a probably excessive number of tabs open.)
Is this guess plausible? Wha
Am 21.04.2013 22:09, schrieb Beartooth:
>
> Arora has just crashed. SELinux reports that I may be under
> attack and should report. I'm guessing it's a lot more likely SELinux is
> being needlessly paranoid. (I'm running F17, fully updated, and arora had
> a probably excessive number of
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:31:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.04.2013 22:09, schrieb Beartooth:
>>
>> Arora has just crashed. [] (I'm running F17, fully updated,
and
>> arora had a probably excessive number of tabs open.)
>>
>> Is this guess plausible? What should I do?
>
> wh
On 04/22/13 05:24, Beartooth wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:31:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 21.04.2013 22:09, schrieb Beartooth:
>>> Arora has just crashed. [] (I'm running F17, fully updated,
> and
>>> arora had a probably excessive number of tabs open.)
>>>
>>> Is this gue
Am 21.04.2013 23:24, schrieb Beartooth:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:31:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 21.04.2013 22:09, schrieb Beartooth:
>>>
>>> Arora has just crashed. [] (I'm running F17, fully updated,
> and
>>> arora had a probably excessive number of tabs open.)
>>>
>>>
On 04/21/2013 03:09 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> Arora has just crashed. SELinux reports that I may be under
> attack and should report. I'm guessing it's a lot more likely SELinux is
> being needlessly paranoid. (I'm running F17, fully updated, and arora had
> a probably excessive number of
On 04/21/2013 11:24 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:31:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 21.04.2013 22:09, schrieb Beartooth:
>>>
>>> Arora has just crashed. [] (I'm running F17, fully updated,
> and
>>> arora had a probably excessive number of tabs open.)
>>>
>>> I
Why is this not all automated on the net so there is a global Fedora
database of SELinux AVC's. That intelligently ignores but tallies what is
know to be a fault and highlights any new breaks ?
Oh, and I believe bugzilla is crap and needs replacing with something more
user friendly. It took 4 atte
On 04/22/13 07:49, poma wrote:
>
>
> yum search Arora
> error: rpmdb: BDB0113 Thread/process 19288/140223507343168 failed:
> BDB1507 Thread died in Berkeley DB library
> error: db5 error(-30973) from dbenv->failchk: BDB0087 DB_RUNRECOVERY:
> Fatal error, run database recovery
> error: cannot open P
On 22.04.2013 02:31, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Is that meant to be helpful in any way to the OP?
Don't be a doubting Thomas. :)
…
> Name and summary matches only, use "search all" for everything.
:)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Why is this not all automated on the net so there is a global Fedora
> database of SELinux AVC's. That intelligently ignores but tallies what is
> know to be a fault and highlights any new breaks ?
>
> Oh, and I believe bugzilla is crap and need
Am 22.04.2013 02:04, schrieb Aaron Gray:
> Why is this not all automated on the net so there is a global Fedora database
> of SELinux AVC's. That intelligently
> ignores but tallies what is know to be a fault and highlights any new breaks ?
>
> Oh, and I believe bugzilla is crap and needs repl
On 04/22/13 16:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 22.04.2013 02:04, schrieb Aaron Gray:
>> Why is this not all automated on the net so there is a global Fedora
>> database of SELinux AVC's. That intelligently
>> ignores but tallies what is know to be a fault and highlights any new breaks
>> ?
>>
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:40:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
[]
> The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
OK, first off, I'm the OP.
I suppose I should be flattered at being addressed as if I were
an Alpha Plus Technoid; but I'm not one. I'm j
On 23 Apr 2013, at 17:10, Beartooth wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:40:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>[]
>> The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
>
>OK, first off, I'm the OP.
>
>I suppose I should be flattered at being addressed as if I were
>
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:44:33 +0100, Junk wrote:
> On 23 Apr 2013, at 17:10, Beartooth wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:40:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>[]
>>> The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
>>
>>OK, first off, I'm the OP.
>>
>>I suppose
Not in particular response to your actual problem, but...
Allegedly, on or about 23 April 2013, Beartooth sent:
> I can't imagine anything I have being of interest to an intruder.
These days, it seems that miscreants have little interest in what's on
your computer, but are interested in using you
On 04/23/2013 07:30 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:44:33 +0100, Junk wrote:
>> Try sealert -a /var/log/audit/audit.log
>
> [root@Hbsk2 ~]# sealert -a /var/log/audit/audit.log
> 12% done[Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'wine-preloader'
> 100% donefound 3 alerts in /var/log/audi
Junk writes:
> It also might be something much more mundane such as a bug in the
> browser which occurs when you have 100+ tabs open and tries to write to
> a misaddressed memory region.
It may well be some malloc()-like routine returning 0, saying "no more
memory for you buddy" and the code bli
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:35:52 +0930, Tim wrote:
> Not in particular response to your actual problem, but...
>
> Allegedly, on or about 23 April 2013, Beartooth sent:
[]
>> My guess is that Arora had well over a hundred, but well under two
>> hundred, tabs open when it crashed.
>
> I r
20 matches
Mail list logo
