On Sun, 2021-07-18 at 19:38 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> The %errorlevel% is 10 which means "I can't do it, waah!"
> (or specifically "Conversion failed due to error while applying GPT
> layout.")
>
> So I'll probably just give Windows 11 a pass :-).
I'd give it a fail, tell it to go back and repe
In other Windows 11 VM news: I experimented with the mbr2gpt tool
in Windows 10 to see if it could really switch my KVM to UEFI.
The /validate option works fine. It says my disk is good to
convert, then the /convert option says:
Cannot perform layout conversion. Error: 0x0001
The %errorlevel
On 15/7/21 16:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/14/21 4:37 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/7/21 22:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/07/2021 20:30, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 21:34 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
The OS in the VM can't see any of the hardware on the host system
unless
> On July 17, 2021 at 11:03 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-07-17 6:01 p.m., mcgarrett wrote:
> >
> >> On July 16, 2021 at 6:36 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 16:47 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>> On 7/15/21 3:47 PM, mcgarrett wrote:
> Is the
On 2021-07-17 6:01 p.m., mcgarrett wrote:
On July 16, 2021 at 6:36 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 16:47 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/15/21 3:47 PM, mcgarrett wrote:
Is there some app that will tell you if your mobo (or cpu) has the
tpm?
If you're running Linux, you
> On July 16, 2021 at 6:36 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 16:47 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 7/15/21 3:47 PM, mcgarrett wrote:
> > > Is there some app that will tell you if your mobo (or cpu) has the
> > > tpm?
> >
> > If you're running Linux, you can check with
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 16:47 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 7/15/21 3:47 PM, mcgarrett wrote:
> > Is there some app that will tell you if your mobo (or cpu) has the
> > tpm?
>
> If you're running Linux, you can check with "ls /dev/tpm*" or
> "journalctl | grep -i tpm". In Windows, it should be so
On 7/15/21 3:47 PM, mcgarrett wrote:
Is there some app that will tell you if your mobo (or cpu) has the tpm?
If you're running Linux, you can check with "ls /dev/tpm*" or
"journalctl | grep -i tpm". In Windows, it should be somewhere in the
device manager.
__
> On July 14, 2021 at 8:13 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
>
> Once upon a time, Stephen Morris said:
> > I thought the TPM was in the cpu, because someone I work with was
> > indicating it was in the cpu, and in my motherboard's bios the
> > activation/deactivation of the fTPM is in the cpu configura
On 7/14/21 4:37 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/7/21 22:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/07/2021 20:30, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 21:34 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
The OS in the VM can't see any of the hardware on the host system
unless the VM specifically passes it through.
On 15/07/2021 08:44, Tom Horsley wrote:
Speaking of Windows 11 requiring UEFI. I found this article
that says Windows 10 has tools already shipped with it to
convert Windows 10 from BIOS to UEFI:
https://www.maketecheasier.com/convert-legacy-bios-uefi-windows10/
I may copy my VM image to a safe
Speaking of Windows 11 requiring UEFI. I found this article
that says Windows 10 has tools already shipped with it to
convert Windows 10 from BIOS to UEFI:
https://www.maketecheasier.com/convert-legacy-bios-uefi-windows10/
I may copy my VM image to a safe backup location and see if
I can convert
Once upon a time, Stephen Morris said:
> I thought the TPM was in the cpu, because someone I work with was
> indicating it was in the cpu, and in my motherboard's bios the
> activation/deactivation of the fTPM is in the cpu configuration
> section.
There are different implementations of the TPM s
On 14/7/21 22:43, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/07/2021 20:30, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 21:34 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
The OS in the VM can't see any of the hardware on the host system
unless the VM specifically passes it through. Normally, all
"hardware" in the VM is vir
On 15/7/21 04:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/14/21 4:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I thought that if the tpm is in the cpu as the bios in my motherboard
is indicating, whether the vm supported adding the hardware tpm as a
device or not, because the vm has access to the cpu, the tpm would
then be a
On 7/14/21 12:25 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Although I've heard that because of Windows 11, those cards have become
expensive and hard to get.
I doubt that that will last long. Once the early adopters have theirs,
the demand will drop, and so will the price.
_
On 7/14/21 4:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I thought that if the tpm is in the cpu as the bios in my motherboard is
indicating, whether the vm supported adding the hardware tpm as a device
or not, because the vm has access to the cpu, the tpm would then be
automatically available to the vm.
Un
On 14/07/2021 20:30, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 21:34 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
The OS in the VM can't see any of the hardware on the host system
unless the VM specifically passes it through. Normally, all
"hardware" in the VM is virtual. qemu has an option to add a TP
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 21:34 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > The OS in the VM can't see any of the hardware on the host system
> > unless the VM specifically passes it through. Normally, all
> > "hardware" in the VM is virtual. qemu has an option to add a TPM
> > by
> > either creating a virtu
On 14/7/21 10:49, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/13/21 4:33 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have a question about TPM hardware.
Fedora 34 running as an image in a Vmware Player VM on a Windows 10
host reports that I don't have a TPM chip, and with Windows 10
running in a Virtualbox (both these VM' are th
> On July 13, 2021 at 6:59 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 14/07/2021 06:49, mcgarrett wrote:
> >> On July 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
> >>> From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
On 7/13/21 4:33 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have a question about TPM hardware.
Fedora 34 running as an image in a Vmware Player VM on a Windows 10 host
reports that I don't have a TPM chip, and with Windows 10 running in a
Virtualbox (both these VM' are the free versions of the VM's) VM on the
On 14/07/2021 07:33, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/7/21 08:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/07/2021 06:49, mcgarrett wrote:
On July 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
prob
On 14/07/2021 07:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/13/21 3:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It isn't possible, AFAIK, to simply change a VM from BIOS to UEFI.
I expect you could by editing the XML, but the installed system would need to
be adjusted as well, including the hard drive partitioning, so not lik
On 14/7/21 08:59, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 14/07/2021 06:49, mcgarrett wrote:
On July 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
problem on older computers,
but it occurs to me
On 7/13/21 3:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It isn't possible, AFAIK, to simply change a VM from BIOS to UEFI.
I expect you could by editing the XML, but the installed system would
need to be adjusted as well, including the hard drive partitioning, so
not likely to be worth the effort.
___
On 14/07/2021 06:49, mcgarrett wrote:
On July 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
problem on older computers,
but it occurs to me that you might not be permitted to in
> On July 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
> > From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
> > problem on older computers,
> > but it occurs to me that you might not be permitted to install the
> > softwar
See below
-Original Message-
From: Ed Greshko
Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 2:23 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Windows 11 VMs
On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
>
On 2021-07-06 2:42 a.m., Stephen Morris wrote:
From the screenshot in the attachment I assume it is telling me that
under Windows 10 it is finding a tpm, is that correct?
That is correct.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
On 07/07/2021 05:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 22:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/07/2021 20:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It's annoying when banks decide to "improve
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 22:19 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/07/2021 20:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by
> > > > requiring
>
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 15:01 -0400, mcgarrett wrote:
> From the mail, it appears that a software TPM should solve the
> problem on older computers,
> but it occurs to me that you might not be permitted to install the
> software unless
> a TPM is found. So, for those who have already tried version 11
> On July 6, 2021 at 1:34 AM "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
>
>
> Tim writes:
>
> > I reckon the default thought of most people who're suddenly faced with
> > a computer failing a security test is not going to be that something
> > has changed on them without authority, but that something has
Tim, with mangled quoting by crapmail programs, come on you've had
decades to get this shit right:
> > I reckon the default thought of most people who're suddenly faced
> with
> > a computer failing a security test is not going to be that
> something
> > has changed on them without authority, b
On 06/07/2021 20:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
standard. All
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 20:22 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
> > their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
> > standard. All banks here use smartcards but the pers
On 06/07/2021 20:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It's annoying when banks decide to "improve" security by requiring
their customers to use a specific platform rather than a general
standard. All banks here use smartcards but the personal terminal is
just an offline card reader with a display.
It
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 19:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/07/2021 18:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > Patrick writes:
> > >
> > > > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly
> > > if the
> > > > user tak
On 06/07/2021 18:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Patrick writes:
> I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the
> user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be
> used to ensure that onl
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 14:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Patrick writes:
>
> > I think much depends on what the TPM is used for. Certainly if the
> > user takes care not to subvert the intention, it can reasonably be
> > used to ensure that only trusted software is run.
>
> "Pragmatical
On 6/7/21 20:33, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 19:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
Is this directly on the hardware or in a VM? If the former, it
would
appear to be a bug. If the latter, presumably the VM is emulating
the
TPM.
Windows is Windows 10 and it is native, I boot the
On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 19:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > Is this directly on the hardware or in a VM? If the former, it
> > would
> > appear to be a bug. If the latter, presumably the VM is emulating
> > the
> > TPM.
> Windows is Windows 10 and it is native, I boot the machine into
> Windows
>
On 6/7/21 00:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 21:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/7/21 07:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
I'll have to give that a try.
Tim writes:
> I reckon the default thought of most people who're suddenly faced with
> a computer failing a security test is not going to be that something
> has changed on them without authority, but that something has gone
> wrong. They're going to try and reset something, rather than work
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 21:42 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 4/7/21 07:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > > Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM
On 4/7/21 07:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn't have that
device.
Oh, I'd never noticed. It is in virt-manager "add hardware"
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 10:29 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
>
> > In the case of Windows 11 under a VM, as you say the software TPM
> can do
> > what it likes. In effect, there is no more guarantee than with a
> system
> > without a TPM and the message that Windo
On 05/07/2021 07:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/07/2021 05:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/07/2021 05:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn'
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 10:29 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Security is hard, the weakest link is often your personnel, you
> shouldn't say you care about security unless you have a specialist
> auditing your systems, and any other generic statements about
> security are marketing drivel. ;-)
Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
> In the case of Windows 11 under a VM, as you say the software TPM can do
> what it likes. In effect, there is no more guarantee than with a system
> without a TPM and the message that Windows 11 can only be used where a TPM
> provides a trust base might give a fal
On 04/07/2021 05:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/07/2021 05:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn't have that
device.
Oh, I'd never not
On 05/07/2021 06:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2021-07-04 at 10:33 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-04 9:08 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 23:09 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
My mobo is about 8 years old, so I don't have the hardware, however
QEMU/KVM apparently
On Sun, 2021-07-04 at 10:33 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-07-04 9:08 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 23:09 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > My mobo is about 8 years old, so I don't have the hardware, however
> > QEMU/KVM apparently emulates it well enough to fool Windo
On 2021-07-04 9:08 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 23:09 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
My mobo is about 8 years old, so I don't have the hardware, however
QEMU/KVM apparently emulates it well enough to fool Windows.
Which as I said earlier, makes the whole thing ridiculous.
On 2021-07-04 2:58 a.m., Bob Marcan wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 23:09:20 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
Anything made in the last few years should have one. If you're running Linux, you can check with
"ls /dev/tpm*" or "journalctl | grep -i tpm".
Mine is too old?
[~]$ journalctl | grep -i tpm
Jun
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 23:09 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-07-03 5:14 p.m., mcgarrett wrote:
> >
> > > On July 3, 2021 at 7:55 PM Tom Horsley
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
> > > mcgarrett wrote:
> > >
> > > > What is a TPM, and does it come with th
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 23:09:20 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-07-03 5:14 p.m., mcgarrett wrote:
> >
> >> On July 3, 2021 at 7:55 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
> >> mcgarrett wrote:
> >>
> >>> What is a TPM, and does it come with the win 11 pac
On 7/4/21 12:36 AM, Walter H. via users wrote:
On 03.07.2021 23:17, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 13:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
system,
are there implica
On 03.07.2021 23:17, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 13:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has thi
On 2021-07-03 5:14 p.m., mcgarrett wrote:
On July 3, 2021 at 7:55 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
mcgarrett wrote:
What is a TPM, and does it come with the win 11 package, or must it be obrained
elsewhere?
It is a piece of hardware that either comes with yo
> On July 3, 2021 at 7:55 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
> mcgarrett wrote:
>
> > What is a TPM, and does it come with the win 11 package, or must it be
> > obrained elsewhere?
>
> It is a piece of hardware that either comes with your motherboard
> if it
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
mcgarrett wrote:
> What is a TPM, and does it come with the win 11 package, or must it be
> obrained elsewhere?
It is a piece of hardware that either comes with your motherboard
if it is new enough, or you have to add (if it has a header to
allow adding) o
> On July 3, 2021 at 6:38 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 23:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
>
Out of curiosity, I thought I'd see if a physical TPM module is
available for my motherboard. Looking in the manual I see there
is a header for one, and gigabyte has a specific model number
for the one that is compatible.
None are in stock anywhere save a couple of entries on ebay where
the normal
On 04/07/2021 05:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn't have that
device.
Oh, I'd never noticed. It is in virt-manager "add hardwa
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 13:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > system,
> > are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
> > already been dealt with?
> >
>
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
> > >
> > > I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn't have that
> > > device.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Oh, I'd never noticed. It is in virt-manager "add hardware"
> >
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 21:07 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 20:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 03/07/2021 20:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > > On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > > > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb
On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
poc
Hi Poc,
Fedora 34
qemu-kvm-5.2.0-8.fc34.x86_64
I have Windows 11 Version Dev (
On 2021-07-03 5:27 a.m., Walter H. via users wrote:
On 03.07.2021 08:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, Vir
On 03/07/2021 20:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/07/2021 20:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft
On 03/07/2021 20:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for the
On 03.07.2021 08:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt wi
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > > > system,
> > > > are
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > > > system,
> > > > are
On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt wi
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 23:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > > system,
> > > are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware,
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
qemu has support for a TPM 2.0 eith
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
qemu has support for a TPM 2.0 either as a passthrough or
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
qemu has support for a TPM 2.0 either as a passthrough or an emulation.
I have
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 12:30 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:24:03 +0200
> Walter H. via users wrote:
>
> > I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware
> > Guest;
> > (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago)
> >
> > On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callagh
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 18:24 +0200, Walter H. via users wrote:
> I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest;
> (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago)
>
> On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:24:03 +0200
Walter H. via users wrote:
> I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest;
> (used the ISO that was leaked several days ago)
>
> On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their
I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest;
(used the ISO that was leaked several days ago)
On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or h
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
86 matches
Mail list logo
