On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:25:08 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
> ok, I did
>
> dnf remove syslinux-extlinux
>
> and after a reboot everything was fine, the link was removed - no
> need of this package ;-)
That's certainly the way to take care of the issue and be sure it
never comes back!
On 24.08.2022 16:19, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:05:21 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
Just the unorthodox question, may I simple remove the link (rm -f
/etc/extlinux.conf)?
I noticed this, when I did the following in folder /etc
grep PATTERN /etc/* -r
Yes. But whenever
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:05:21 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
> Just the unorthodox question, may I simple remove the link (rm -f
> /etc/extlinux.conf)?
>
> I noticed this, when I did the following in folder /etc
>
> grep PATTERN /etc/* -r
Yes. But whenever syslinux-extlinux is updated, it
On 23.08.2022 20:59, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:45:24 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016304 <-- still
relevant for fc36(!)
Why?
I think the answer is that no one has done the work. It has been a
long time since I had anythi
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:45:24 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016304 <-- still
> relevant for fc36(!)
>
> Why?
I think the answer is that no one has done the work. It has been a
long time since I had anything to do with syslinux. From reading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016304 <-- still relevant
for fc36(!)
Why?
Thanks,
Walter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
