Kevin Wilson wrote:
> What do you mean by repeatable environment.?
The environment is the Fedora install, with all RPMs, configuration, and
files in home directories – everything that could potentially affect the
RPM build process. A repeatable environment is one that you can specify
and be sure t
Am 16.12.2012 20:32, schrieb Kevin Wilson:
> Ok, I was afraid that somehow my binaries will be replaced
> by the --rebuild. Now I know that without installing the rpm
> nothing will occur to them, so it is safe and solves my problem.
and that is why i explained you NOT to build packages
as root
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:38:54 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> for sure, try to understand how rpmbuild works
>
> * unpack the sources
> * run configure
> * make install in the buildroot
> * pack the RPM is all files are existing and listed in the %files section
>
> and that is why running as root m
Thanks.
What do you mean by repeatable environment.?
KW
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> repeatable environment.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gui
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 09:32:45PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Thanks a lot for this info!
> Ok, I was afraid that somehow my binaries will be replaced
> by the --rebuild. Now I know that without installing the rpm
> nothing will occur to them, so it is safe and solves my problem.
Correct. Altho
Hi
Thanks a lot for this info!
Ok, I was afraid that somehow my binaries will be replaced
by the --rebuild. Now I know that without installing the rpm
nothing will occur to them, so it is safe and solves my problem.
rgs
Kevin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 09:24:21PM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Last one, really:
> suppose I want to build a source rpm. I do not
> want to run make install as I do want to keep my orig binaries.
> So what should I do ?
> this is in fact the reason that I tried
> rpmbuild -bp specFile
> and the mo
Thanks!
Last one, really:
suppose I want to build a source rpm. I do not
want to run make install as I do want to keep my orig binaries.
So what should I do ?
this is in fact the reason that I tried
rpmbuild -bp specFile
and the moving to BUILD/ppp-2.4.5 and ./configure && make from there.
But with
Am 16.12.2012 19:33, schrieb Kevin Wilson:
> Thanks for the advice. I am well aware of it.
so why ignore it?
> This machine is a testing machine with very
> little which is important and it is backed up
does not matter
there is no clean buildroot guaranteed if running as root
> Forgive me m
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:06:35 +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> I don't know the difference between
> "rpmbuild -bb ppp.spec" or at least
> and "rpmbuild -bc ppp.spec".
"man rpmbuild" explains these two build options.
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.6.10-5.fc18.x86_64
loadavg: 0.18 0.2
Hi,
Thanks for the advice. I am well aware of it. This machine is a
testing machine with very
little which is important and it is backed up and I intend to isntall
there f18 in a month anyway.
Forgive me my ignorance: quick question: does
rpmbuild --rebuild
includes running "make install"? I did no
Am 16.12.2012 19:06, schrieb Kevin Wilson:
> Hello,
> rpmbuild --rebuild ppp-2.4.5-22.fc17.src.rpm WORKED for me;
> the executables were generated under /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/ppp-2.4.5
do NOT build packages as root!
any error in the source or SPEC may overwrite files on
your running system - the
Hello,
rpmbuild --rebuild ppp-2.4.5-22.fc17.src.rpm WORKED for me;
the executables were generated under /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/ppp-2.4.5
I don't know the difference between
"rpmbuild -bb ppp.spec" or at least
and "rpmbuild -bc ppp.spec".
rgs
Kevin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:27:15 +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 16.12.2012, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>
> > But wasn't the process of installing the src rpm as I did
> > was supposed to look for it? isn't the src.rpm is the origin when
> > preparing rpm in the Fedora project release process ?
>
> Yes, I
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:13:35AM +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
> I did the following on x86_64 fedora machine:
> - downloaded ppp-2.4.5-22.fc17.src.rpm
> ran: rpm -ivh ppp-2.4.5-22.fc17.src.rpm
> then
> rpmbuild -bp --target=x86_64 /root/rpmbuild/SPECS/ppp.spec
It's possible there's someth
On 16.12.2012, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> But wasn't the process of installing the src rpm as I did
> was supposed to look for it? isn't the src.rpm is the origin when
> preparing rpm in the Fedora project release process ?
Yes, I see your point, and I'm thinking the same.
This raises the question ho
Hi,
Thanks, I thought so.
But wasn't the process of installing the src rpm as I did
was supposed to look for it? isn't the src.rpm is the origin when
preparing rpm in the Fedora project release process ?
Let met rephrase my question: When I take any src.rpm,
can't I rely on preparing an rpm out of
On 16.12.2012, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/ppp-2.4.5/chat'
> cc -c -DTERMIOS -DSIGTYPE=void
> -UNO_SLEEP
> -DFNDELAY=O_NDELAY -o chat.o chat.c
> cc -pie -o chat chat.o
> /bin/ld:
Hello,
I did the following on x86_64 fedora machine:
- downloaded ppp-2.4.5-22.fc17.src.rpm
ran: rpm -ivh ppp-2.4.5-22.fc17.src.rpm
then
rpmbuild -bp --target=x86_64 /root/rpmbuild/SPECS/ppp.spec
then
cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/ppp-2.4.5
./configure
make
got this error:
d chat; make all
make[1]: En
19 matches
Mail list logo
