On 2/2/23 22:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes?
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
dnf still tried to upgrade wine
I bet you have some other excludepkgs lines after
On 2/2/23 22:26, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/1/23 23:05, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/01/2023 10:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
The second exclude should be redundant, as it's already covered by the
first one. That doesn't
On 2/1/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes?
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
dnf still tried to upgrade wine
I bet you have some other excludepkgs lines after that. Only the last
one takes effect. I just
On 2/1/23 23:05, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/01/2023 10:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
The second exclude should be redundant, as it's already covered by the
first one. That doesn't explain what's going on, but I did
On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 21:55 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes?
>
> # grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
> excludepkgs=wine*
> excludepkgs=wine-*
>
> dnf still tried to upgrade wine
Does the asterisk need escaping, there?
e.g. w
On 02/01/2023 10:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
The second exclude should be redundant, as it's already covered by the
first one. That doesn't explain what's going on, but I did want to
mention
On 2/1/23 22:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:55 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes?
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
dnf still tried to upgrade wine
And wine 8 IS EVEN WORSE THAN WINE 7
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:55 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes?
>
> # grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
> excludepkgs=wine*
> excludepkgs=wine-*
>
> dnf still tried to upgrade wine
>
>
> And wine 8 IS EVEN WORSE THAN
Hi All,
What is wrong with my wine dnf excludes?
# grep -i wine /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
excludepkgs=wine*
excludepkgs=wine-*
dnf still tried to upgrade wine
And wine 8 IS EVEN WORSE THAN WINE 7
Wine 8.0.1 cannot print to a local printer, but can to a network printer
https
, and then ran dnf
update and it installed the latest files.
Don't know if that would be an issue with dnf upgrade or
something with winehq or is just that one is suppose to
manually update it.
Thanks.
++
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:03:55AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish upgrading
> when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to find it just
> now and have come up empty.
>
>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 08:03:55 -0800
Scott Beamer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
> upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling
> to find it just now and have come up empty.
>
> Does anyone kno
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 08:03 -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
> upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling
> to
> find it just now and have come up empty.
>
> Does an
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 12:04 PM Scott Beamer
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
> upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to
> find it just now and have come up empty.
>
> Does anyone know w
On 11/8/22 08:03, Scott Beamer wrote:
I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to
find it just now and have come up empty.
Does anyone know what it is?
yum had an option for that, but not dnf. Just
On 9/11/22 03:03, Scott Beamer wrote:
Greetings,
I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling
to find it just now and have come up empty.
Does anyone know what it is?
I'm not sure you actually need
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:03:55AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
Greetings,
I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to
find it just now and have come up empty.
Does anyone know what
On 11/8/22 8:09 AM, Doug Herr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022, at 8:03 AM, Scott Beamer wrote:
Greetings,
I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to
find it just now and have come up empty.
Does anyone
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022, at 8:03 AM, Scott Beamer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
> upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to
> find it just now and have come up empty.
>
> Does anyone know
Greetings,
I recently read somewhere that there is a dnf command to finish
upgrading when an upgrade crashes during an upgrade. I tried Googling to
find it just now and have come up empty.
Does anyone know what it is?
Thanks.
Scott
___
users
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 16:33 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Kept checking it for a few hours, and then eventually it
> did start returning valid addresses.
>
> download1.rpmfusion.org. 300IN A 193.28.235.6
>
> Don't know if it was a router issue, or a configuration
> issue.
On 18 Oct 2022 at 15:41, Tim wrote:
Subject:Re: dnf with rpmfusion not working? Are
others seeing this?
From: Tim
To: mi...@guam.net, Community support for
Fedora users
Date sent: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:41:03 +1030
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 04:44 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> dig @8.8.8.8 download1.rpmfusion.org
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.16.33-RH <<>> @8.8.8.8
> download1.rpmfusion.org
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 36512
>
Check my local dns and google's get not address?
dig @8.8.8.8 download1.rpmfusion.org
; <<>> DiG 9.16.33-RH <<>> @8.8.8.8
download1.rpmfusion.org
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 36512
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1,
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 15:49 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 9/30/22 15:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Please remember to quote the text you are responding to in replies.
>
> And trim out everything that's not relevant to your reply, as I did
> here, especially including signatures and/or
On 9/30/22 15:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Please remember to quote the text you are responding to in replies.
And trim out everything that's not relevant to your reply, as I did
here, especially including signatures and/or footers.
___
users
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 19:28 +0200, Mgr. Janusz Chmiel wrote:
> Dear MR Horne,
> Thank you very much for this very useful command line option.
> I will always type it when even I will want to perform AN systém
> upgrade on my chroot container.
Please remember to quote the text you are
Dear MR Horne,
Thank you very much for this very useful command line option.
I will always type it when even I will want to perform AN systém upgrade on my
chroot container.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 13:41 +, old sixpack13 wrote:
> > Dear advanced users and developers,
> ...
> > Or unfortunately, Dnf and also Yum do not allow users to skip or exclude
> > kernel related
> > packages?
> ...
>
> sudo dnf upgrade --exclude=kern
> Dear advanced users and developers,
...
> Or unfortunately, Dnf and also Yum do not allow users to skip or exclude
> kernel related
> packages?
...
sudo dnf upgrade --exclude=kernel-core
will exclude:
- kernel and
- kernel-core and
- kernel-modules
I'm unsure about kernel-hea
like to know, if is it possible to exclude all kernel related Fedora
packages when installing new packages or when upgrading The systém by typing
Dnf upgrade –refresh
When I upgrade kernel reated packages for more than for The first time, Proot,
special C app which simulates real Linux file
On Aug 25, 2022, at 17:56, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> dnf update provides:
>
> Package mozilla-openh264-2.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> Package openh264-2.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache u
Hello,
dnf update provides:
Package mozilla-openh264-2.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Package openh264-2.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not signed
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages
On 7/24/22 01:42, Patrick Dupre wrote:
It seems that fc36 tries to run a dnf update automatically when the machine goes
to shutdown.
If I am correct, how can I avoid it?
That's not quite correct. Gnome Software (or PackageKit) by default
downloads updates in the background
Hello,
It seems that fc36 tries to run a dnf update automatically when the machine goes
to shutdown.
If I am correct, how can I avoid it?
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
On Sat, 2022-07-23 at 03:21 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 15:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I generally use 'dnf search ...':
>
> Or: dnf search --all mythtv
>
> Adding the "all" option will mean that descriptions menti
On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 15:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I generally use 'dnf search ...':
Or: dnf search --all mythtv
Adding the "all" option will mean that descriptions mentioning mythtv
will be included in the results, not just packages with mythtv in the
filename or
t; obvious name only.
I generally use 'dnf search ...':
$ dnf search mythtv
Last metadata expiration check: 15:02:42 ago on Fri 22 Jul 2022 00:01:38 BST.
===
Name
12:15, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > The simple stupid way is:
> > dnf list | grep -i package-name-here
>
> Much simpler is:
> dnf list available $PACKAGENAME
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To u
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022, 10:25 Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using
dnf
Dnf provides 'name'
May provide what you want..
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 7/21/22 11:07, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using dnf
without installation.
Is there a reason you sent this 3 times?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 7/21/22 12:15, Roger Heflin wrote:
The simple stupid way is:
dnf list | grep -i package-name-here
Much simpler is:
dnf list available $PACKAGENAME
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
Hello,
I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using dnf
without installation.
Thank
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire
If I understand your question, just use
dnf search packagename
Best,
Clifford
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 11:04 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using
> dnf
> without installa
The simple stupid way is:
dnf list | grep -i package-name-here
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 1:08 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using dnf
> without installa
Hello,
I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using dnf
without installation.
Thank
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire
Hello,
I would like to check if a package in available for installation by using dnf
without installation.
Thank
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire
On 7/3/22 15:56, Go Canes wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 6:21 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
# dnf "--setopt=excludepkgs=wine*" whatprovides 'wine*'
You want << --setopt=excludepkgs='"" >> <--- EMPTY - to override the
exclude you have in the config f
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 6:21 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> # dnf "--setopt=excludepkgs=wine*" whatprovides 'wine*'
You want << --setopt=excludepkgs='"" >> <--- EMPTY - to override the
exclude you have in the config file. Your command is excluding an
On 7/3/22 13:58, Go Canes wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 4:30 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
$ su root -c "dnf --setopt=excludepkgs=wine* whatprovides wine*"
That should really be "dnf --setopt=excludepkgs='' whatprovides 'wine*' "
...otherwise shell globbing could get
On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 4:30 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> $ su root -c "dnf --setopt=excludepkgs=wine* whatprovides wine*"
That should really be "dnf --setopt=excludepkgs='' whatprovides 'wine*' "
...otherwise shell globbing could get in the way. ANd you want
e
On 7/3/22 12:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/3/22 09:23, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/1/22 15:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Due to this bug:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
The issue is corrected in Wine
On 7/3/22 09:23, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/1/22 15:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Due to this bug:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
The issue is corrected in Wine 7.12. Our intrepid
testers missed
On 7/1/22 15:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Due to this bug:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
The issue is corrected in Wine 7.12. Our intrepid
testers missed this bugs and allowed 7 out in
the wild. Oh
On 7/2/22 16:45, Grumpey wrote:
$ su root -c "dnf --disableexcludes=main info wine-common"
Password:
Copr repo for openvpn-release owned by dsommers 496 B/s | 341 B
00:00
Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:dsommers:openvpn-release':
> $ su root -c "dnf --disableexcludes=main info wine-common"
> Password:
> Copr repo for openvpn-release owned by dsommers 496 B/s | 341 B
> 00:00
> Errors during downloading metadata for repository
> 'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:dsommers:openvpn-release':
>
On 7/2/22 09:18, George N. White III wrote:
The winehq bug says the patch works on 7.11 as well. Koji has wine-7.11
builds for Fedora 35,
36, and 37 in updates-testing
I will wait for 7.15 to show up in the repo. I
do appreciate the extra layer of testing, even
though they missed this one:
On 7/2/22 05:44, Grumpey wrote:
How do I ask dnf what current Wine repo releases
are available (current and downgrade in case of
another blocking bug) whilst I have wine excluded?
Disable the configuration file excludes. Takes one of the following
three options:
all, disables all configuration
On 7/2/22 12:27, Barry Scott wrote:
dnf does not have a -n option.
OK, then use --assumeno which I know it has.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
> On 2 Jul 2022, at 08:58, Tim via users wrote:
>
> Tim:
>>> I can't remember if there's a "practice only" kind of option.
>
> Joe Zeff:
>> Instead of using dnf -y use dnf -n.
>
> Doing a no instead of yes just abandons the download and install,
> On 2 Jul 2022, at 06:15, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> On 7/1/22 22:17, Tim via users wrote:
>> I can't remember if
>> there's a "practice only" kind of option.
>
> Instead of using dnf -y use dnf -n.
dnf does not have a -n option.
$ dnf update -n
usage: dn
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 7:52 PM ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Due to this bug:
>
> https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
>
> I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
>
> The issue is corr
> How do I ask dnf what current Wine repo releases
> are available (current and downgrade in case of
> another blocking bug) whilst I have wine excluded?
Disable the configuration file excludes. Takes one of the following
three options:
all, disables all configuration file excludes
main,
>> no downgrade, it will take my business down.
maybe:
- cp /etc/dnf/dnf.conf /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.alt
- edit /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.alt to remove the exclude
- dnf -c /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.alt list wine
[per "dnf -?" the "--disableexcludes [repo]" should have worked.
maybe it needs
&q
Tim:
>> I can't remember if there's a "practice only" kind of option.
Joe Zeff:
> Instead of using dnf -y use dnf -n.
Doing a no instead of yes just abandons the download and install, the
kind of thing I'd already described. I was thinking of whether there
was an optio
On 7/1/22 22:17, Tim via users wrote:
I can't remember if
there's a "practice only" kind of option.
Instead of using dnf -y use dnf -n.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
ackground.
Don't actually do any installs during your test.
Never use "assume yes" kind of options.
Always do your updates so you have to press Y (for yes) to proceed.
I never do yum/dnf updates without making it confirm before proceeding.
Like you, I don't want any nasty surprises where
your system. I was
just suggesting *a* way that might work. Sorry if I came across bossy.
You did not.
Cheers,
Thomas
$ dnf --setopt=includepkgs=wine* whatprovides wine*
Did not work either. Dang!
___
users mailing list -- users
On 7/1/22 19:50, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I am afraid to take the exclusion out as if Wine
gets accidentally upgrade to 7.0 and I have
no downgrade, it will take my business down.
Totally fair point. Not trying to tell you how to run your system. I was
just suggesting *a* way that
of
that. Comment out the exclusion, run the dnf check command, then
uncomment it. Sometimes I'll ^Z out of vim, run the command, then go
back and press "u".
Good advice. If there is anyway to do it with
the exclusion in place, I'd rather do it that way.
Murphy's l
the dnf check command, then
uncomment it. Sometimes I'll ^Z out of vim, run the command, then go
back and press "u".
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F
On 7/1/22 16:27, Go Canes wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 6:52 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
How do I ask dnf what current Wine repo releases
are available (current and downgrade in case of
another blocking bug) whilst I have wine excluded?
The following do not work. Nothing shows
On 7/1/22 16:33, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
On 7/1/22 17:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Due to this bug:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
Take the exclusion out. Run "yum list wine*" and see if
On 7/1/22 17:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Due to this bug:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
Take the exclusion out. Run "yum list wine*" and see if the update has
made it out. I just checked on
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 6:52 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> How do I ask dnf what current Wine repo releases
> are available (current and downgrade in case of
> another blocking bug) whilst I have wine excluded?
>
> The following do not work. Nothing shows
>
> $ dnf
Hi All,
Due to this bug:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52586
I have Wine updates excluded from /etc/dnf/dnf.conf.
The issue is corrected in Wine 7.12. Our intrepid
testers missed this bugs and allowed 7 out in
the wild. Oh the SHAME of it. But we still love
them anyway
On Jun 29, 2022, at 18:46, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
>
> It is installed on all 4 machines, but 3 don't have the
> yumdb directory??
The RPM spec file for dnf shows that it does own the yumdb directory in the dnf
package, but it has the %ghost attribute, wh
On 30 Jun 2022 at 15:04, Andras Simon wrote:
From: Andras Simon
Date sent: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:04:46 +0200
Subject:Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dnf/yumdb
To: mi...@guam.net
Copies to: Community support for Fedora users
2022-06-30 0:45 UTC+02:00, Michael D. Setzer II :
> On 29 Jun 2022 at 22:20, Andras Simon wrote:
[...]
>> > Thanks. I have 3 other machines in room that are running
>> > Fedora 35, and none of them have the /var/lib/dnf/yumdb
>> > directory at all.
>>
>&g
On 29 Jun 2022 at 22:20, Andras Simon wrote:
From: Andras Simon
Date sent: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 22:20:44 +0200
Subject:Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dnf/yumdb
To: mi...@guam.net,
Community support for Fedora users
> 2022-06-29
2022-06-29 19:24 UTC+02:00, Michael D. Setzer II via users
:
> Thanks. I have 3 other machines in room that are running
> Fedora 35, and none of them have the /var/lib/dnf/yumdb
> directory at all.
This is strange, because that directory belongs to the dnf-data
package, and I'm sure
On 29 Jun 2022 at 18:05, Barry wrote:
Subject:Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dnf/yumdb
From: Barry
Date sent: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:05:17 +0100
To: Community support for Fedora users
Copies to: mi...@guam.net, stan
Send
> On 29 Jun 2022, at 14:12, stan via users
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:31:51 +1000
> "Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote:
>
>> Are files in /var/lib/dnf/yumdb of any use??
>> Dates of files and directories seem to all be June 20 2019
>
On 29 Jun 2022 at 6:11, stan via users wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:11:23 -0700
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dnf/yumdb
Organization: zohofree
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:31:51 +1000
"Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote:
> Are files in /var/lib/dnf/yumdb of any use??
> Dates of files and directories seem to all be June 20 2019
> and seem to be for Fedora 29 and earlier.
> Machine is currently running Fedora 35??
&
Are files in /var/lib/dnf/yumdb of any use??
Dates of files and directories seem to all be June 20 2019
and seem to be for Fedora 29 and earlier.
Machine is currently running Fedora 35??
Is there a command to clean them correctly.
Are the just leftovers from pervious versions.
dnf autoremove
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 19:22:12 +1000
"Michael D. Setzer II via users" wrote:
> So not sure why this one got left over, or why there isn't a
> newer kernel-headers for the active kernels.
The kernel-headers is a separate package, and it is only updated if the
header files actually change. So,
On 16 Jun 2022 at 15:24, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:24:01 +1000
Subject:Re: error messages during dnf update??
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Eyal Lebedinsky
Send reply to: Community
On 16/06/2022 15.04, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Just did a dnf update and notice a whole lot of messages
like this.
hardlink: cannot link ./include/net/devlink.h to
/usr/src/kernels/5.17.11-200.fc35.x86_64/./include/net/de
vlink.h.hardlink-temporary: File exists
Just did a dnf update and notice a whole lot of messages
like this.
hardlink: cannot link ./include/net/devlink.h to
/usr/src/kernels/5.17.11-200.fc35.x86_64/./include/net/de
vlink.h.hardlink-temporary: File exists
++
Michael D
some
small amount of real time (typically about 10-50us) but is a huge amount
of time compared to the few cpu cycles it takes to create the iop.
Seagate BarraCuda 3.5 (CMR) ST2000DM006-2DM164, 2.00 TB.
The 15-20 minute problem was occurring either
- at the end of the clean-up phase of the &q
Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:48 AM home user wrote:
> On 6/2/22 2:50 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 6/2/22 13:03, home user wrote:
> >> When doing my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), I get swamped with
> >> "hardlink" error messages. There are a huge number of them, and
On 6/2/22 2:50 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/2/22 13:03, home user wrote:
When doing my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), I get swamped with
"hardlink" error messages. There are a huge number of them, and they
fly past far too fast to see what dnf was doing when the messages
started
(replying to a few posts)
(Roger)
> > Well, do not assume anyone is actually looking at the log files.
(Samuel)
> Yes, unless you're watching the updates happen, you won't see it.
I do watch the "dnf upgrade" output live.
I upgraded from f34 to f35 on April 07. I thi
On 6/2/22 17:39, Roger Heflin wrote:
I have 2 of those kernel-debug-devel packages installed. I also have
rpm fusion nvidia drivers.
And this system started with fc25.
That explains it then. You should probably remove those packages and
put the regular devel package if you even need it.
my experience of debugging
> > linux systems in my day job, the odds are the important looking error
> > messages coming of the scriptlets/kernel is *NORMAL* and not actually
> > important nor useful unless you are the one creating the spec file for
> > the rpm.
> &g
dnf log files on the one home system I checked appear to
have 11,000 of the errors in each file.
Do you also have kernel-debug-devel packages installed? Has this system
been upgraded for many versions?
I don't have any errors like that, but this install is newer than the
issue that caused
are the one creating the spec file for the rpm.
And 2 of my dnf log files on the one home system I checked appear to have
11,000 of the errors in each file.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 6:09 PM home user wrote:
> On 6/2/22 3:24 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > From reading the errors it w
tis...@comcast.net>> wrote: > Before proceeding, please note that I have no sys.admin. training or
experience. I'm a home user trying to maintain my home f35 workstation.
When doing my weekly patches (dnf upgrade), I get swamped with
"hardlink" error messages. T
On 6/2/22 14:45, home user wrote:
On 6/2/22 2:50 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
For some reason you have debug kernels installed. Try "dnf remove
kernel-debug*" and see if that solves your problem.
Removing:
kernel-debug-devel x86_64
5.17.
201 - 300 of 2266 matches
Mail list logo
