Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Frank Murphy
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:03:04 -0600 Ranjan Maitra wrote: you may have missed this, but I did correct my earlier statement > in that earlier e-mail. So we are now on the same page: I agree with > you. > > Yeah, missed that bit. ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list user

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:57:51 + Frank Murphy wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:46:57 -0600 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > . > > > > This point has nothing to do with dnf and as I clarified, this is not > > what I was talking about. > > > > Ranjan > > > > It was the first bit I got confused on: >

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Frank Murphy
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:46:57 -0600 Ranjan Maitra wrote: . > > This point has nothing to do with dnf and as I clarified, this is not > what I was talking about. > > Ranjan > It was the first bit I got confused on: >I tried dnf. One major issue that I did not like is that I asked it to >instal

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:25:08 + Frank Murphy wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:17:52 -0600 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > This is not true. Try yum install zikula on a F20 machine. > > sudo dnf install zikula > Automatic local repo. (manged by the "local" yum > plugin). > 31 MB/s | 1.3 MB

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Frank Murphy
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:17:52 -0600 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > This is not true. Try yum install zikula on a F20 machine. sudo dnf install zikula Automatic local repo. (manged by the "local" yum plugin). 31 MB/s | 1.3 MB 00:00 Resolving dependencies --> Starting dependency resolution ---> Pack

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:03:00 + Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:42:58 -0600 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > I tried dnf. One major issue that I did not like is that I asked it to > > install a bunch of stuff, one of which was not available (in F20). > > That meant dnf would not inst

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-10 Thread Frank Murphy
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:42:58 -0600 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > I tried dnf. One major issue that I did not like is that I asked it to > install a bunch of stuff, one of which was not available (in F20). > That meant dnf would not install anything. > > yum won't install stuff that's not in F20 repos e

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:36:42 + Andre Robatino wrote: > Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes: > > > Also it was not clear to me that it was using deltarpms. Of course, I > > did not look into all possibilities so there may be some setting that I > > needed to have. > > Unfortunately, dnf doesn't

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Andre Robatino
Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes: > Also it was not clear to me that it was using deltarpms. Of course, I > did not look into all possibilities so there may be some setting that I > needed to have. Unfortunately, dnf doesn't yet support deltarpms. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Ranjan Maitra
I tried dnf. One major issue that I did not like is that I asked it to install a bunch of stuff, one of which was not available (in F20). That meant dnf would not install anything. Also it was not clear to me that it was using deltarpms. Of course, I did not look into all possibilities so there m

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Frank Murphy
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:21:39 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > I guess I just don't understand, it seems like an update should > include everything that needs changing ... Dnf is faster but if it > only does half as much is that an improvement? > It is for some who don't like

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 09/01/14 09:31, Frank Murphy wrote: On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:26:32 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: Apologies wrong link http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/02/dnf-update-and-yum-update-produce-different-output/ ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com I guess I just don't understan

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Jan Zelený
On 9. 1. 2014 at 14:31:09, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:26:32 -0500 > "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > > Apologies wrog link > > http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/02/dnf-update-and-yum-update-produce-differen > t-output/ Just a note here: if you want the MD to be synced

Re: dnf-yum observation - link corrected

2014-01-09 Thread Frank Murphy
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:26:32 -0500 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: Apologies wrog link http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/02/dnf-update-and-yum-update-produce-different-output/ ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or c