On 6/9/19 3:17 AM, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
Data Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:42:59 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users napisał(a):
On 6/7/19 1:07 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another
Data Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:42:59 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users napisał(a):
> On 6/7/19 1:07 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700
> > ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> >> I am really confused!
> > me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
> Both should work the same i
On 6/7/19 1:07 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
d
Both should work the same in this instance.
It is just that dnf does not think xrdp exists
either on the repo
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
d
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fed
Hi All,
I need a second pair of eye here. I think I am typo'ing something
On the third server, I am trying to upgrade xrdp to match the
first two
On two Fedora 30 servers,
$ rpm -qa xrdp
xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
$ dnf whatprovides xrdp
...
xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64 : O
