longer
supported. A bunch of crap, I know - but I had the same issue with
another release.
what do they change to?
This is the latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
disconnected from the web, there will be no
. A bunch of crap, I know - but I had the same issue with
another release.
what do they change to?
This is the latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
disconnected from the web, there will be no updates from the
issue with
another release.
what do they change to?
This is the latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
disconnected from the web, there will be no updates from the archive.
There has been at least one *major
;
>>>>> The url of the repos change AFTER the release is no longer
>>>>> supported. A bunch of crap, I know - but I had the same issue with
>>>>> another release.
>>>> what do they change to?
>>>
>>> This is the latest versions of
release.
what do they change to?
This is the latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
disconnected from the web, there will be no updates from the archive.
There has been at least one *major* security issue since
with
>>> another release.
>>
>> what do they change to?
>
>
> This is the latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
> when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
> disconnected from the web, there will be no updates fr
On 29/09/2016 03:36, Dave Stevens wrote:
> significant ways. But I use Mint on a laptop and boy was the changeover
> from 17 to 18 ever easy, just point and click and lotsa useful new stuff.
Not for the KDE edition -- reinstall is required.
___
users ma
he latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
disconnected from the web, there will be no updates from the archive.
There has been at least one *major* security issue since F18 (openssl
had a bad hole; was that heartbe
This is the latest versions of everything that was in the repositories
when the release went EOL. If you were up to date on F18 when you
disconnected from the web, there will be no updates from the archive.
There has been at least one *major* security issue since F18 (openssl
had a bad hole; was t
On 09/28/2016 07:11 PM, Doug wrote:
On 09/28/2016 08:57 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/28/2016 05:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the
internet
for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after which I'll
install a new
Quoting Doug :
On 09/28/2016 08:57 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/28/2016 05:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the internet
for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after which I'll
install a newer version. The first t
On 09/28/2016 08:57 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/28/2016 05:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the internet
for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after which I'll
install a newer version. The first thing I did after
Quoting jd1008 :
On 09/28/2016 06:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the
internet for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after
which I'll install a newer version. The first thing I did after
connecting it
On 09/28/2016 05:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the internet
> for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after which I'll
> install a newer version. The first thing I did after connecting it was
> to run
On 09/28/2016 06:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the
internet for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after
which I'll install a newer version. The first thing I did after
connecting it was to run updates. I g
I've got a box with F18 on it. It has not been connected to the
internet for two years but I need to use it now for a while, after
which I'll install a newer version. The first thing I did after
connecting it was to run updates. I got about a hundred or so messages
which seem to
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Ben Blankley wrote:
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Max Pyziur
> > To: Community support for Fedora users
> > Cc:
> > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:43:32 -0500 (EST)
> > Subject: Re: Leaping from F18 -> F2
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Max Pyziur
> > To: Community support for Fedora users
> > Cc:
> > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:43:32 -0500 (EST)
> > Subject: Re: Leaping from F18 -> F21
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, jd1008 wrote:
&
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, jd1008 wrote:
On 02/27/2015 03:15 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
I decided to begin making the leap from F18 to F21. My reluctance in
upgrading with each new release was due to all of the problems that were
reported with upgrades, and not wanting to go through a
On 02/27/2015 03:15 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
I decided to begin making the leap from F18 to F21. My reluctance in
upgrading with each new release was due to all of the problems that
were reported with upgrades, and not wanting to go through a
dependency upgrade ordeal.
Now with
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
Would anyone have advice on how to install all of the remaining necessary
pieces for a functioning F21 i686 Gnome Desktop?
Fedora Workstation implies GNOME, so there isn't a separate group.
I have a
On 02/27/2015 02:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Fedora Workstation implies GNOME, so there isn't a separate group.
I understand that Fedora is Gnome-centric, but shouldn't there be a way
to install Gnome later if you install with a different DE then change
your mind? If nothing else, it might be
On 02/27/2015 02:15 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
However, my Gnome problem remains: there is no provision in F21-i686 for a
yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop" so that I have a functioning Gnome or
Gnome-Classic desktop (there is one for "MATE Desktop," btw).
I don't use F 21 as yet, so I tried this fro
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
> Would anyone have advice on how to install all of the remaining necessary
> pieces for a functioning F21 i686 Gnome Desktop?
Fedora Workstation implies GNOME, so there isn't a separate group.
I have a quite old i686 laptop circa 2003. GNOME 3
Greetings,
I decided to begin making the leap from F18 to F21. My reluctance in
upgrading with each new release was due to all of the problems that were
reported with upgrades, and not wanting to go through a dependency upgrade
ordeal.
Now with F18 firmly EOL'd and enough packages sh
On 06/11/14 12:56, Mike Wright wrote:
> I put f18 onto a system three days ago and am having a lot of trouble making
> some basic things work.
Are you aware that.
As of 14th January 2014, Fedora 18 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including se
Hi all,
I put f18 onto a system three days ago and am having a lot of trouble
making some basic things work.
The old way of setting up keyboard shortcuts is gone and the mapping
between the keyboard and XF86, such as Volume Mute <=> XF86Mute are
gone. They now map to Pragha. We'
On Thu 29 May 2014 01:02:59 PM PET, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:12 AM, David Carpio wrote:
I have reinstalled again and again but it is the same result.
If reinstalling once didn't work, why did you waste time trying again?
II just tried it 3 times checking another solutions, but now I
On 05/29/2014 08:12 AM, David Carpio wrote:
I have reinstalled again and again but it is the same result.
If reinstalling once didn't work, why did you waste time trying again?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
Fedora 18 is EOL so I suppose that you will get no answer
2014-05-29 17:12 GMT+02:00 David Carpio :
> Hello everybody:
>
> A month ago when I start Fedora I have the same problem the system shows
> me this message:
>
> Process /usr/cupsd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
>
> And I cannot enter t
Hello everybody:
A month ago when I start Fedora I have the same problem the system shows
me this message:
Process /usr/cupsd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
And I cannot enter to CUPS interface
http://127.0.0.1:631
I have reinstalled again and again but it is the same result.
Any sugges
Hello everybody:
A month ago I have the same problem when Fedora 18 is running always
shows me this message:
Process /usr/cupsd was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
And I cannot enter to CUPS interface
http://127.0.0.1:631
I have reinstalled again and again but it is the same result.
Any sugg
On 17 March 2014 19:27, Mike Wright wrote:
> 03/17/2014 07:49 AM, Tim wrote:
>
>> Allegedly, on or about 16 March 2014, Mike Wright sent:
>>
>>> On Chrome it displays perfectly (or falls back to sans-serif???) but
>>> on firefox it is extremely difficult to read. Using firebug I can
>>> force it
Allegedly, on or about 17 March 2014, Mike Wright sent:
> Not so sure I like the idea of a webpage pulling in a font family when
> we have perfectly fine fonts provided by fedora ;)
Me either, and you have to hope the browser can't be exploited in this
way. There may well be a configuration opti
03/17/2014 07:49 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 16 March 2014, Mike Wright sent:
On Chrome it displays perfectly (or falls back to sans-serif???) but
on firefox it is extremely difficult to read. Using firebug I can
force it to use sans-serif, which does display nicely.
Here's the link
Allegedly, on or about 16 March 2014, Mike Wright sent:
> On Chrome it displays perfectly (or falls back to sans-serif???) but
> on firefox it is extremely difficult to read. Using firebug I can
> force it to use sans-serif, which does display nicely.
>
> Here's the link to a screen capture:
>
>
Hi all,
Running firefox v26.0 on f18 with xfce and trying to enjoy the new Ted
Talks, e.g.:
http://www.ted.com/talks/juan_enriquez_wants_to_grow_energy.
Their new site pulls in its own fonts: helvetica-neue.
On Chrome it displays perfectly (or falls back to sans-serif???) but on
firefox it
I ran 'yum distro-sync --setopt=deltarpm=0' and got 2 downgrades which
is fine as now 'yum check' does not report any error anymore.
The downgrade where: python-urlgrabber and xorg-x11-drv-modesetting.
Thanks,
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change su
On 25 January 2014 11:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/25/14 16:45, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > I am running F20. I first installed F18 I guessed or F17, I do not
> > remember well and used fedup to update my installation.
> >
> > However, when I can see that packages wi
On 01/25/14 16:45, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I am running F20. I first installed F18 I guessed or F17, I do not
> remember well and used fedup to update my installation.
>
> However, when I can see that packages with .fc17 .fc18 and .fc19 in
> there name are still installed (see
I am running F20. I first installed F18 I guessed or F17, I do not
remember well and used fedup to update my installation.
However, when I can see that packages with .fc17 .fc18 and .fc19 in
there name are still installed (see below). Is that normal?
Frédéric
# yum list installed|grep "\
lesome PC, so I will try this later).
R.
On Thu Jan 23 01:10:13 UTC 2014 Chris Murphy
wrote:
>On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:23 AM, Stub wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have F18 on an i686 PC.
>>
>>Why does the /boot/grub2/grub.cfg still have entries to the logical volumes?
&
On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:23 AM, Stub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have F18 on an i686 PC.
>
> I have changed my boot up sequence from logical volumes to regular partitions.
> Upon regenerating the grub2 boot process, the grub2 keeps creating a
> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file that refer
Hi,
I have F18 on an i686 PC.
I have changed my boot up sequence from logical volumes to regular partitions.
Upon regenerating the grub2 boot process, the grub2 keeps creating a
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg file that refers to the non-existing logical volumes.
Hence, the boot process fails with a
I tried to update my F18 system to F19 using fedup. I followed the
instructions in the user guide for doing the upgrade. Fedup completed
without errors so I rebooted to complete the upgrade. When I rebooted th
system it displayed a progress bar which after several hours never
changed its
I just tried doing a fedup F18 to F20; the fedup itself worked fine
(apart from from a few warnings about GPG keys), but booting from the
'System Upgrade' grub entry failed early on, not being able to find
any of my system's filesystems. I suspect this is due to them being LUKS
e
I have upgraded my system from F18 to F20 with fedup. Last year I
upgraded from F16 to F18 with preupgrade and fedup, and it did not go
well. This time was much better.
The boot option to upgrade did not appear until I rebuilt the grub2 menu
with:
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
I
On 12-22-13 18:24:25 John Aldrich wrote:
> Can I just do a "yum remove *.fc18.*" to remove those packages since
> I should have the F20 versions now?
You want to run
package-cleanup --dupes
This will print the F18 packages that also have F20 installed. Erase
only those (wh
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:24:25 -0500
John Aldrich wrote:
> Can I just do a "yum remove *.fc18.*" to remove those packages since
> I should have the F20 versions now?
I'd advise against blindly doing so.
First, try a 'yum distro-sync'. This will make sure you have the newest
versions of those pack
Can I just do a "yum remove *.fc18.*" to remove those packages since I should
have the F20 versions now?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorap
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:39:47 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
> I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
> and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
> broken dependencies
>
On 12/22/13 21:39, John Aldrich wrote:
> I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
> and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
> WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
> broken dependencies
> kmod-nvidia-3
I use KMOD-NVIDIA on my system, and I ran FEDUP to upgrade to F20 overnight
and when I came to my computer this morning, there were several warnings:
WARNING: problems were encountered during transaction test:
broken dependencies
kmod-nvidia-304xx-3.11.7-100.fc18.x86_64-304.88-4.fc18.x86_64
Hi
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:14 PM, John Aldrich wrote:
> Can I use FedUp to go directly from Fedora 18 to Fedora 20 or do I need to
> upgrade to F19 first?
fedup can be used for a direct upgrade
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
Can I use FedUp to go directly from Fedora 18 to Fedora 20 or do I need to
upgrade to F19 first?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o
On 11/30/2013 12:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
but fails to show password-box after clicking the User name
thus impossible to log on.
Syslog data pertinent to XDMCP:
Dec 4 16:56:44 gold xinetd[1186]: START: vnc-1024x768x24 pid=4672
from=:::10.1.0.5
Dec 4 16:56:45 gold dbus-daemon[781]: db
On 11/30/2013 12:50 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
What's up with TigerVnc? It seems to be missing
the Ctrl-Alt-Del icon and other icons for Windoes?
If there is another VncClient that has it, what would
it be?
Ahh... memory lapse! I forgot about 'F8' key!
Sorry for the noise!
--
users mailing list
but fails to show password-box after clicking the User name
thus impossible to log on.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-o
What's up with TigerVnc? It seems to be missing
the Ctrl-Alt-Del icon and other icons for Windoes?
If there is another VncClient that has it, what would
it be?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
David:
>> Congratulations! You went from a reasonably safe Firefox feature to a
>> known buggy and security unsecured Adobe Reader.
>>
>> Google search for "Adobe Reader Security Breach".
Doug:
> Probably the reason that Adobe won't make anything more for Linux is
> that so many people like this
On 11/27/2013 12:58 AM, Dan Thurman wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 07:13 PM, David wrote:
> Why is the latest foxit release FC-9?
>
I don't know but I would think a licensing problem would be a good guess.
I use the Firefox built in feature myself. I only offered Foxit Reader
as an option since the OP
On 11/26/2013 07:13 PM, David wrote:
On 11/26/2013 9:36 PM, Doug wrote:
On 11/26/2013 07:59 PM, David wrote:
On 11/26/2013 6:57 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
On 11/23/2013 12:41 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to
On 11/26/2013 9:36 PM, Doug wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 07:59 PM, David wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 6:57 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2013 12:41 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
prope
On 11/26/2013 07:59 PM, David wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 6:57 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
>> On 11/23/2013 12:41 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
>>>
>>> It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
>>> hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
>>> properly and bring up the the web page.
>>>
>>>
On 11/26/2013 6:57 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
> On 11/23/2013 12:41 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
>>
>> It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
>> hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
>> properly and bring up the the web page.
>>
>> I tried the same PDF file on F13 and it works.
On 11/23/2013 12:41 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
properly and bring up the the web page.
I tried the same PDF file on F13 and it works.
Is it a bug or is there something I need to do
to make t
On 23.11.2013 21:41, Dan Thurman wrote:
>
> It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
> hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
> properly and bring up the the web page.
>
> I tried the same PDF file on F13 and it works.
>
> Is it a bug or is there something I need to d
It appears that on Fedora 18, Adobe Acrobat Reader
hyperlinks (control-left-click on link) fails to execute
properly and bring up the the web page.
I tried the same PDF file on F13 and it works.
Is it a bug or is there something I need to do
to make this work?
--
users mailing list
users@lists
Good evening all - at least, it is evening here in Austria!
My 2nd machine is a Toshiba Equium A60-692, with a (massive!) 40GB
harddrive & a (minute!) 750MB RAM.
It used to work fine, then I tried to fedup from F17 to F18..
Most of the time it would work fine, as long as I kept the m
Am 22.10.2013 20:00, schrieb Dan Thurman:
> I at one time installed bind with chroot but decided
> to remove the bind-chroot package but it did not
> clean up and remove chroot mounts so I manually
> removed the chroot mounts, reconfgured bind,
> restarted named, with no apparent errors.
>
> But
Am 23.10.2013 17:28, schrieb Dan Thurman:
> Why not ask dovecot.org?
because Timo was asked often enough the remove this
stupid behavior as default
> I read their site and it appears that dovecot supports clustered
> filesytems, *dsync, and a myriad of different things. Then I found
> this:
>
>
On 10/22/2013 11:00 PM, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 11:00 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
dovecot complains in maillog, the following errors:
dovecot: master: Warning: /var/named/chroot/etc/named.root.key is no
longer mounted. See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints
I notice you've resolved
Tim:
>> Since Fedora likes to put removeable media into /var/run/username/media
>> you might encounter that problem again, unless you put /var/run into its
>> ignore database.
Tom Horsley:
> It is worse than that. It apparently doesn't store the
> ignored info anywhere, because if a mountpoint app
Uiteraard!
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Tom Horsley [mailto:horsley1...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:15 PM W. Europe Standard Time
Aan: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Onderwerp: Re: F18: Bind-chroot & Dovecot mount errors, how to fix?
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 1
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:30:19 +1030
Tim wrote:
> Since Fedora likes to put removeable media into /var/run/username/media
> you might encounter that problem again, unless you put /var/run into its
> ignore database.
It is worse than that. It apparently doesn't store the
ignored info anywhere, becau
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 11:00 -0700, Dan Thurman wrote:
> dovecot complains in maillog, the following errors:
>
> dovecot: master: Warning: /var/named/chroot/etc/named.root.key is no
> longer mounted. See http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Mountpoints
I notice you've resolved this, but I find the informati
On 10/22/2013 11:00 AM, Dan Thurman wrote:
I at one time installed bind with chroot but decided
to remove the bind-chroot package but it did not
clean up and remove chroot mounts so I manually
removed the chroot mounts, reconfgured bind,
restarted named, with no apparent errors.
But now, doveco
I at one time installed bind with chroot but decided
to remove the bind-chroot package but it did not
clean up and remove chroot mounts so I manually
removed the chroot mounts, reconfgured bind,
restarted named, with no apparent errors.
But now, dovecot complains in maillog, the following errors
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:00:11 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> My old Thinkpad T30 (on which I ran fedup from F18 to F19) is
>> beginning to seem like more effort than it's worth, ever if eventual
>> s
On 10/20/2013 02:28 PM, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> # yum abracadabra *poof!*
>
> :-P
>
> On 10/20/2013 1:16 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> H? I wonder if there's a yum command that will change a i686
>> system to a x86_64 system of the same release.
>
LOL!!!
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark
# yum abracadabra *poof!*
:-P
On 10/20/2013 1:16 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
H? I wonder if there's a yum command that will change a i686
system to a x86_64 system of the same release.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https:/
On 10/20/2013 12:04 PM, Beartooth wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:00:11 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>> Is there a FedDown lurking out
>>> there somewhere?
>>
>> You can always try `yum --releasever=18 distro-sync'. But it goes
>> w
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:00:11 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>> Is there a FedDown lurking out
>> there somewhere?
>
> You can always try `yum --releasever=18 distro-sync'. But it goes
> without saying, there are no guarantees whatsover.
On 10/17/2013 09:44 AM, Beartooth wrote:
-X
Enables X11 forwarding. This can also be specified on a per-host basis
in a configuration file.
Yes, I know it can be done; that's why I didn't tell you that you were
trying something that doesn't work. I was just pointing out that it's
not the d
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:30:19 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
[]
> You might try asking at the Xfce forum: http://forum.xfce.org/index.php
> because this might be DE specific. However, before you do, have you
> made sure that ssh is set up to deal properly with X? (I don't think
> that it is b
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:00:11 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> My old Thinkpad T30 (on which I ran fedup from F18 to F19) is
>> beginning to seem like more effort than it's worth, ever if eventual
>> s
On 10/16/2013 01:13 PM, Beartooth wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:39:05 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/16/2013 08:22 AM, bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
I rebooted, hoping for a login screen. No such luck. I tried typing
xfce and enter, and xfce4 and enter, and finally startx, for lack of
any other
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:39:05 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 08:22 AM, bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>> I rebooted, hoping for a login screen. No such luck. I tried typing
>> xfce and enter, and xfce4 and enter, and finally startx, for lack of
>> any other idea; they all failed.
>
> Fr
On 10/16/2013 08:22 AM, bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
I rebooted, hoping for a login screen. No such luck. I tried typing
xfce and enter, and xfce4 and enter, and finally startx, for lack of any
other idea; they all failed.
From a CLI:
startxfce4
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraprojec
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:04:26PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>
> My old Thinkpad T30 (on which I ran fedup from F18 to F19) is
> beginning to seem like more effort than it's worth, ever if eventual
> success of the effort were a sure thing. Is there a FedDown lurking out
> My old Thinkpad T30 (on which I ran fedup from F18 to F19) is
> beginning to seem like more effort than it's worth, ever if eventual
> success of the effort were a sure thing. Is there a FedDown lurking
> out there somewhere?
>
> Will an install DVD for F18 (p
On 15 Oct 2013 at 17:04, Beartooth wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Beartooth
Subject: F19 --> F18 feasible?
Date sent: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 + (UTC)
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora us
My old Thinkpad T30 (on which I ran fedup from F18 to F19) is
beginning to seem like more effort than it's worth, ever if eventual
success of the effort were a sure thing. Is there a FedDown lurking out
there somewhere?
Will an install DVD for F18 (preferably one with
long
list, but the menu package I am looking for has 2nd level
sub-categories with names such as Action, Logic... and likewise
with Electronics. I compared F18 against F13 installs and I am
led to think that there might be a newer version of games menu
that came later and from what I remember
Dan Thurman wrote:
> Since I am using the MATE desktop, I have yet to find
> the package that recategorized the desktop menus such
> as Electronics, Games, and so on.
pkg names include:
electronics-menu
games-menus
among others ('yum search menu' shows lots of candidates)
-- rex
--
users ma
Since I am using the MATE desktop, I have yet to find
the package that recategorized the desktop menus such
as Electronics, Games, and so on.
Can someone point me in the right direction, please?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
I did a ps command and found the following:
root 622 1 0 10:52 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log
-F BUG: WARNING: at INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG
at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear
stack overflow (cur: eneral protect
After giving up on getting printer discovery to work I decided to directly
add the network printer (shared from my F19 desktop) to my wife's F18
laptop. Initial setup was not a problem but I've had some quirkyness since.
1. In Google Chrome, it locks up either during preview genera
On 09/10/2013 02:42 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
Anyone get this one to work?
I tried unchecking the scripts and plugins
and within a few seconds, it hung. I had
to force kill it.
As part of debugging, I disabled: settings plugins, scripts
and "Watch for folder changes", and selected each folder
on
On 09/10/2013 03:39 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
Sep 9 14:28:17 systemd[1]: \
Cannot add dependency job for unit mdmonitor-takeover.service, \
ignoring: Unit mdmonitor-takeover.service failed to load: No \
such file or directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status \
mdmonitor-takeover.service'
1 - 100 of 1270 matches
Mail list logo
