Re: fedora packages

2020-10-11 Thread ITwrx
On 10/11/20 7:29 PM, stan via users wrote: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 19:16:02 -0500 > ITwrx wrote: > >> I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4 >> 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i >> get a 503. >> >> Am i going to the right place to see t

Re: fedora packages

2020-10-11 Thread stan via users
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 19:16:02 -0500 ITwrx wrote: > I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4 > 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i > get a 503. > > Am i going to the right place to see the source code, build status of > the package, and w

Re: fedora packages

2020-10-11 Thread ITwrx
On 10/11/20 7:16 PM, ITwrx wrote: > I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4 > 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i get a > 503. > > Am i going to the right place to see the source code, build status of > the package, and who the maintainer

fedora packages

2020-10-11 Thread ITwrx
I'm trying to find out why the nim-lang package "nim" is very old (q4 2019), but when i go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ i get a 503. Am i going to the right place to see the source code, build status of the package, and who the maintainer is, etc? thanks ___

Re: firefox plugin using fedora packages

2012-01-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.01.2012 10:51, schrieb Maurizio Marini: > Hello > i would java plugin on firefox using fedora packages, w/out installing jre > oranything by java/sun site. > Is it feasible? yum install icedtea-web Name: icedtea-web Arch: x86_64 Version : 1.0.6 Release

firefox plugin using fedora packages

2012-01-09 Thread Maurizio Marini
Hello i would java plugin on firefox using fedora packages, w/out installing jre oranything by java/sun site. Is it feasible? br, m. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: installing PECL extensions via "pecl" versus fedora packages

2010-02-19 Thread Christof Damian
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 14:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >  so the question is, given that installing via the "pecl" command > gives one access to hundreds of possible PHP extensions, what's the > rationale behind that small number of fedora-packaged extensions?  is > there some reason someone decid

installing PECL extensions via "pecl" versus fedora packages

2010-02-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
fairly new to PHP and PECL extensions on fedora 12 so i'm curious about the small number of fedora pre-packaged extensions. as an example, using "pecl", i can install the "memcache" extension: # pecl install memcache that downloads the source, configures it, builds it and eventually gives m