On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:08:51 -0300 "George N. White III"
wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 11:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> > On 2020-04-01 21:31, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > Sorry, my mistake: I think that it will be dropped in F33 if the
> > maintainer does not respond.
> >
> > I see.
> >
> > Well,
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 11:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-04-01 21:31, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Sorry, my mistake: I think that it will be dropped in F33 if the
> maintainer does not respond.
>
> I see.
>
> Well, it currently exists in rawhide.
>
> ersion : 0.65.3
> Release :
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 22:33:55 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-04-01 21:31, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Sorry, my mistake: I think that it will be dropped in F33 if the maintainer
> > does not respond.
>
> I see.
>
> Well, it currently exists in rawhide.
>
> ersion : 0.65.3
> Release :
On 2020-04-01 21:31, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake: I think that it will be dropped in F33 if the maintainer
> does not respond.
I see.
Well, it currently exists in rawhide.
ersion : 0.65.3
Release : 1.fc33~bootstrap
Architecture : x86_64
Size : 38 M
Source :
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:36:37 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-04-01 13:27, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have noticed that hugo is FTBS in Fedora 32 may be dropped?
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799514
> >
> > There are other bugs/RFEs also so it seems that it
On 2020-04-01 13:27, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that hugo is FTBS in Fedora 32 may be dropped?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799514
>
> There are other bugs/RFEs also so it seems that it may be a maintainer who is
> no longer able to care for this RPM.
FYI,
Hi,
I have noticed that hugo is FTBS in Fedora 32 may be dropped?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799514
There are other bugs/RFEs also so it seems that it may be a maintainer who is
no longer able to care for this RPM.
Ranjan
___
