Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-07 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 1/7/21 6:16 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just to let everyone know here, this was a bug/issue with pungi (the tool that makes repos for Fedora), plus a weird situation that caused this. It was fixed yesterday, and we are taking steps to preve

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-07 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Just to let everyone know here, this was a bug/issue with pungi (the > tool that makes repos for Fedora), plus a weird situation that caused > this. > > It was fixed yesterday, and we are taking steps to prevent it from > happening again. :)

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Just to let everyone know here, this was a bug/issue with pungi (the tool that makes repos for Fedora), plus a weird situation that caused this. It was fixed yesterday, and we are taking steps to prevent it from happening again. :) Sorry for the hassle. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP s

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-07 Thread Doug H.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/01/2021 06:40, John Pilkington wrote: > > I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package > > is not signed.   A build done yesterday was successful and is running.  > > Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fai

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed' [Fixed]

2021-01-07 Thread John Pilkington
On 07/01/2021 05:51, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/01/2021 13:33, Tim via users wrote: John Pilkington: I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed.   A build done yesterday was successful and is running.  Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with t

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 13:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I'm not sure how this could happen with updates repos. pungi (The > tool that makes them) fails if something isn't signed correctly. All the more reason to be suspicious and cautious, if there's supposed to be a counter-check that doesn't allo

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/2021 13:33, Tim via users wrote: John Pilkington: I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed. A build done yesterday was successful and is running. Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the same error. Is it just me? Ed Gresh

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Tim via users
John Pilkington: >> I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv >> package is not signed. A build done yesterday was successful and >> is running. Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the >> same error. >> >> Is it just me? Ed Greshko: > It isn't just you. >

Re: libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/2021 06:40, John Pilkington wrote: I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed.   A build done yesterday was successful and is running. Attempts to  'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the same error. Is it just me? It isn't just you. I

libuv-1.40.0-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm 'is not signed'

2021-01-06 Thread John Pilkington
I just had a failed build of MythTV, apparently because this libuv package is not signed. A build done yesterday was successful and is running. Attempts to 'dnf reinstall libuv' also fail with the same error. Is it just me? John P ___ users mailing