> On 22 Jul 2024, at 15:33, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
> I'm running syslog because that has what has always been running.
Unless you need specific syslog features journal is a big improvement.
The logs are records with fields, not just a string of text, that allows for
smarter searching for ex
I'm running syslog because that has what has always been running. This
was from before systemd. Why both rsyslog and syslog-ng were running I
have no idea. I did not intentionally start both, I assumed only one
would be running.
Paolo
On 7/21/24 01:15, Barry wrote:
On 21 Jul 2024, at 01
> On 21 Jul 2024, at 01:20, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
> Actually I have both running.
That will not work. Only one must be running.
Just to check; are you using syslog because systemd journal is not covering
your use-case?
If journal is sufficient then remove both the syslog daemons.
Barry
Actually I have both running.
Paolo
On 7/20/24 16:37, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
It's interesting that both packages are available on F39.
Is there a reason to have both? And if only one should be
installed which?
It's not really different than having multiple web browsers
o
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> It's interesting that both packages are available on F39.
> Is there a reason to have both? And if only one should be
> installed which?
It's not really different than having multiple web browsers
or desktop environments. Some folks like rsyslog, some like
syslog-ng. You
It's interesting that both packages are available on F39. Is there a
reason to have both? And if only one should be installed which?
Paolo
On 7/20/24 14:27, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Go Canes wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 3:49 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I wonder then if this is an issue due to
Go Canes wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 3:49 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>>
>> I wonder then if this is an issue due to dnf upgrade? I've used dnf
>> upgrade to upgrade my system since at least F35. I wonder if at some
>> point there was a syslog file which then became rsyslog and the old
>> sysl
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 3:49 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
> I wonder then if this is an issue due to dnf upgrade? I've used dnf
> upgrade to upgrade my system since at least F35. I wonder if at some
> point there was a syslog file which then became rsyslog and the old
> syslog file was never remov
I wonder then if this is an issue due to dnf upgrade? I've used dnf
upgrade to upgrade my system since at least F35. I wonder if at some
point there was a syslog file which then became rsyslog and the old
syslog file was never removed.
Paolo
On 7/20/24 12:33, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 20
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:05:10 -0700
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> A little investigation showed the following in /etc/logrotate.d
>
> rsyslog:/var/log/messages
> syslog:/var/log/messages
I don't have a syslog file in my /etc/logrotate.d, only rsyslog.
I'm running fedora 40 and logrotate seems to be wo
I have updated my system using dnf upgrade for several releases. I am
currently running F39. Today I was looking at my running services and
noticed that the logrotate.service is failing to start due to the
following error:
Jul 20 11:49:41 caseyjones.homenet192-168-10.com logrotate[307129]:
11 matches
Mail list logo
