On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 20:30 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:10 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> > Specially with any package that is somehow related to security it
> > would be comforting to be assured that at least some people take the
> > trouble to have a look at it. The fact th
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 11:10 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> Specially with any package that is somehow related to security it
> would be comforting to be assured that at least some people take the
> trouble to have a look at it. The fact that without any changes it
> still works after all thes
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Chris Adams
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 3:53 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: package (tinyca2) not longer present in F15, what to do about it
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:55:08 -0500
Chris Adams wrote:
> I understand being dropped from Fedora for no package maintainer. I was
> responding to the "no upstream in 5 years == not safe" comment.
Clearly fedora needs to be restricted only to packages that
are riddled with bugs and need to be consta
Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > > I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream.
> > > It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream.
> > It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it's no
> > longer safe for inclusion in Fedora.
>
> W
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> I find it very difficult to believe that at no time in the last five
> years that no security vulnerabilities could have been identified in a
> Certificate Authority.
Please stop unfounded fearmongering.
All TinyCA does is call out to OpenSSL command l
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:40:44 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I find it very difficult to believe that at no time in the last five
> years that no security vulnerabilities could have been identified in a
> Certificate Authority.
But what does that have to do with a gui interface tool that probabl
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 08:42 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:10:39 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream.
> > It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it's no
> > longer safe for inclu
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream.
> It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it's no
> longer safe for inclusion in Fedora.
Why does "long time since last release" mean "no longer safe"? Pro
Hi there,
>> I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream.
>> It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it's no
>> longer safe for inclusion in Fedora.
>
>Or maybe it just does a job, does it well, and needs no frenetic
>change for the sake of chang
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:10:39 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I should note, however, that tinyca2 development appears dead upstream.
> It last saw a release on July 25, 2006! So chances are good that it's no
> longer safe for inclusion in Fedora.
Or maybe it just does a job, does it well, and ne
age (tinyca2) not longer present in F15, what to do about it?
>
> For years before and up to F14 Fedora was contained package 'tinyca2'
> (TinyCA is a graphical tool to manage a small Certification Authority,
> program was in group Applications/Internet). This package is mis
On 08/08/2011 10:42 PM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
[smip]
> If it is just some self-signed certificates, you can ise the openssl
> commandline tools
> If you are doing serious things with certificates, i would recommend ejbca
>
> It is distro agnostic with a web interface (java engine)
Similar t
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Frantisek Hanzlik
Sent: maandag 1 augustus 2011 03:52
To: Fedora users
Subject: package (tinyca2) not longer present in F15, what to do about it?
For years before
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:51:38 +0200,
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
> I was using it for years and it's IMO usefull program for anyone who
> works with certificates. For now I simple build this package for F15
> from its F14 SRPMS, but it would be better when this package was in Fedora
> distro
For years before and up to F14 Fedora was contained package 'tinyca2'
(TinyCA is a graphical tool to manage a small Certification Authority,
program was in group Applications/Internet).
This package is missing in F15, Technical Notes not mention nothing
about this:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-
17 matches
Mail list logo
