On 07/13/2013 07:42 PM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish.
>> Are you saying that 'yum list installed' doesn't really tell you what
>> is actually installed and you need to use 'rpm -V' instead?
>>
>> What are
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
> On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
>> "Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
>>
>>> On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
On 07/13/2013 10:07 AM, lee wrote:
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A p
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:27:52 +0200
lee wrote:
> Assuming that package A doesn't work with the more recent version of
> package C?
Right, that was my assumption. If it does, then it would just update
them all.
...snip...
> Yes, this situation was the result of an upgrade that didn't finish.
>
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> imagine you have the following:
>>
>>
>> package A, depends on C, installed
>> package B, depends on C, not installed
>> package C, installed
>>
>>
>> All the packages are version 1. After a while, you ins
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." writes:
> On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
>> Another question: It is possible to have version 1 and version 2 of
>> package A installed at the same time, like version 1 from Fedora 17 and
>> version 2 from Fedora 18. Imagine this package A provides a file
>> '/bin/ls'.
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 03:11:20 +0200
lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> imagine you have the following:
>
>
> package A, depends on C, installed
> package B, depends on C, not installed
> package C, installed
>
>
> All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B,
> and in the meantime,
On 07/12/2013 09:11 PM, lee wrote:
Hi,
imagine you have the following:
package A, depends on C, installed
package B, depends on C, not installed
package C, installed
All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B,
and in the meantime, package B has been updated to vers
Hi,
imagine you have the following:
package A, depends on C, installed
package B, depends on C, not installed
package C, installed
All the packages are version 1. After a while, you install package B,
and in the meantime, package B has been updated to version 2 so that it
now depends on versi
10 matches
Mail list logo