On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 22:16:09 +0100
Barry wrote:
> > On 6 Jul 2023, at 15:08, Franta Hanzlík via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > But sometimes I need to build an RPM package "in the field", at my
> > colleagues/friends/... machines - and I don't use the ~/.rpmmacros
>
> Why not put the one line in t
> On 6 Jul 2023, at 15:08, Franta Hanzlík via users
> wrote:
>
> But sometimes I need to build an RPM package "in the field", at my
> colleagues/friends/... machines - and I don't use the ~/.rpmmacros
Why not put the one line in the .rpmmacros when off site, i am curious?
It is surely no less
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 09:42:30 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:59:05 +0200
> Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
>
> > The problem seems to be somehow caused by ~/rpmbuild being a symlink (
>
> If a symlink is the problem, you could always set up a ~/.rpmmacros
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:59:05 +0200
Franta Hanzlík via users wrote:
> The problem seems to be somehow caused by ~/rpmbuild being a symlink (
If a symlink is the problem, you could always set up a ~/.rpmmacros
file with the line:
%_topdir /path/to/real/rpmbu
1()(64bit)
librados.so.2()(64bit) libtalloc.so.2()(64bit)
libtalloc.so.2(TALLOC_2.0.2)(64bit) libtevent.so.0()(64bit)
libtevent.so.0(TEVENT_0.9.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Processing files: samba-debugsource-4.18.3-4.fc38.x86_64
error: Empty %files file
/home/hanzlik/rpmbuild/BUILD/sam
Hello,
running rpmbuild -bb perl-Alien-GSL.spec
I get:
PM build errors:
File not found:
/home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-Alien-GSL-1.03-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/*
rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-Alien-GSL-1.03-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/perl5
does not exit.
I guess that I need
Hello,
I am trying to generate a rpm package from the sources of
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.72
I run cpanspec to generate the .spec file (see below) and I get.
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1624752000
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.iQt9av
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILD
Here is the new error
rpmbuild -bb perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot.spec
warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 9:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1624060800
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N0YTFx
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pdupre
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 9:00 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> This spec file provide the an error.
> Can you help me to fix it?
You didn't show the compiler flags in use, so this is just a guess, but ...
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
... this message suggests that -Werror is included.
Hello,
This spec file provide the an error.
Can you help me to fix it?
PLplot.c: In function 'XS_PDL__Graphics__PLplot_plgfci':
PLplot.c:85895:25: warning: unused variable 'RETVAL' [-Wunused-variable]
85895 | unsigned intRETVAL;
| ^~
/usr/lib64/perl5/
On 6/15/19 1:10 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Another question
How could I get
%{_bindir}/*
added in the %files section
without having to edit the generated .spec file (i.e. when I run cpanspec)?
You would have to modify cpanspec to substitute that.
___
us
===
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 at 5:41 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:38:56 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.noa
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:38:56 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.noarch
> The solutions that I found are:
> 1) add Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release}
> in perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry.spec
> or
> 2) remove
> BuildRequires: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63
On 6/14/19 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
1) I expect that I would have to edit the .spec file
That's right. You do. And that's expected.
http://cpanspec.sourceforge.net/ indicates: "It is assumed that
maintainers will need to do some (hopefully small) amount of work to
clean up the genera
==
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 at 7:06 PM
> From: "Gordon Messmer"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
> &g
anges to perl-Tk-JFileDialog, and building the
package, both packages can be installed:
# rpm -q perl-Tk-JFileDialog perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry
perl-Tk-JFileDialog-2.20-1.fc30.noarch
perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.noarch
On 6/10/19 1:10 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:09:58 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Maybe, however, some perl packages require packages with a version
> number higher than a certain value.
> Thus, if the Provides/Requires instructions are not set properly,
> all the packages requiring other packages fail, either at the bu
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:43:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Again, I am not sure to understand:
> >
> > cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
> >
> > only add:
> > BuildRequires: perl-generators
> > in the .spec file
> >
> > which does not h
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:43:24 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Again, I am not sure to understand:
>
> cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
>
> only add:
> BuildRequires: perl-generators
> in the .spec file
>
> which does not help.
It helps with auto
Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 4:50 AM
> From: "Samuel Sieb"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick
On 6/12/19 1:43 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Again, I am not sure to understand:
cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
only add:
BuildRequires: perl-generators
in the .spec file
which does not help.
The spec file you get from cpanspec will need to be modified
at 2:26 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:13:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > I am not sure to take the point:
>
> You focus on something else.
>
> > I can run
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:13:10 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am not sure to take the point:
You focus on something else.
> I can run
> cpanspec --add-buildrequires perl-generators Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
> --add-provide "perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) %{version}-%{release}"
>
> If it is correct.
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/11/19 12:13 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Again, why the generation of the .spec is not automatic?
>
> Because the script isn't perfect and it's a difficult problem to solve.
> cpanspec appears to be pretty dead upstream. You could try filing a bug in
> Fedora bugzilla.
F
On 6/11/19 12:13 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Again, why the generation of the .spec is not automatic?
Because the script isn't perfect and it's a difficult problem to solve.
cpanspec appears to be pretty dead upstream. You could try filing a bug
in Fedora bugzilla.
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 12:46 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:45:23 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Sorry, when I run
> > cpanspec Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
>
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:45:23 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Sorry, when I run
> cpanspec Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
I referred to _build time_ creation of inter-package dependencies.
The step when rpmbuild adds Requires/Provides to the built packages.
You are not supposed to hack a spec f
rgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 5:22 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:35:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release}
>
> seems missing in the .spec file
No. These are automatically created Provides/Requires for Perl Modules.
You need to work with a package that _really_ includes and "Provides"
th
Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
> > Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec
> > In addition, I get:
> > rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec
> > error: F
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:10:54 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec
> In addition, I get:
> rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63 is needed by
> perl-Tk
Thank.
Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec
In addition, I get:
rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63 is needed by
perl-Tk-JFileDialog-2.20-1.fc30.noarch
while the installed version is 5.22
Could you tell me what is wr
On 6/9/19 2:27 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/JBrowseTest.pl
Add that path to the %files section of the spec. If you're maintaining
this for redistribution, you might want to list the path as
"%{_bindir}/JBrowseTest.pl"
rpm/check-files
/home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22-1.fc30.x86_64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/JBrowseTest.pl
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/JBrowseTest.pl
Any ide
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 08:38:05 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 6/9/19 7:29 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > How can I make a rpmbuild and keep the compiled files?
>
>
> Have you tried "rpmbuild --noclean"?
Alternatively, end the building after the %build stage:
rp
On 6/9/19 7:29 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
How can I make a rpmbuild and keep the compiled files?
Have you tried "rpmbuild --noclean"?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
Hello,
How can I make a rpmbuild and keep the compiled files?
BUILD
and
BUIDROOT
are erased
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9
Hi,
Thanks again! The spec file compiles fine but also does without libtool. Why do
we need it?
What more info would you like? I don't know what a desktop file does exactly,
and I don't know why there is a file such as that in /etc/wbar.d, sorry.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan
On Tue, 25
Ranjan Maitra writes:
RPM build errors:
Macro expanded in comment on line 11: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Am2P0X (%build)
I wonder: what is causing these errors? Line 11 of the file seems to be
something else.
Line 11 has nothing to do with t
I played around a bit and built it in mock and found several dependencies
you didn't have in the spec file. You didn't provide the desktop file so I
commented it out but I noticed it puts one in /etc/wbar.d so I'm not sure
what it's for...
I can fix it up a bit more if you can provide more info.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:47 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:52:46 -0500 Richard Shaw
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm
> > > using a previously
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:52:46 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm
> > using a previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and
> > which comp
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm
> using a previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and
> which compiled without incident till F27.
Over time gcc gets more pedantic abou
available at: https://code.google.com/archive/p/wbar/downloads
So, I get the error:
$ rpmbuild -bb wbar.spec
warning: Macro expanded in comment on line 11: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XYyyfC
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd /home
lejeczek via users wrote:
> It actually might be working. What I was doing I was looking for a
> confirmation like this:
>
> $ ps -FC rpmbuild --cols
> UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD
> appmgr 24855 24835 0 44512 6772 16 17:33
On 11/06/18 17:07, lejeczek via users wrote:
I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read?
$ _def1="_me 1"
$ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\'
and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not
"react" to it. I run it f
lejeczek via users wrote:
> I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read?
>
> $ _def1="_me 1"
> $ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\'
>
> and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not
> "react" t
I'm sorry, I do not get it.. was I so hard to read?
$ _def1="_me 1"
$ rpmbuild --define \'"${_def1}"\'
and no matter how I quote, how I escape bash's var, rpmbuild does not
"react" to it. I run it from a bash script.
I should mention I
On 09.06.2018 00:50, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 03:24 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote:
>> On 08.06.2018 23:58, lejeczek via users wrote:
>>
>>> $ _def1="_me 1"
>>> $ rpmbuild --define=${_def1}
>>
>> Try double quotes around your macro:
>>
On 06/08/2018 03:24 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote:
> On 08.06.2018 23:58, lejeczek via users wrote:
>
>> $ _def1="_me 1"
>> $ rpmbuild --define=${_def1}
>
> Try double quotes around your macro:
>
> $ rpmbuild --define "${_def1}"
The man page specifies
lejeczek via users wrote:
> On 08/06/18 16:39, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> lejeczek via users wrote:
>>> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg
>>>
>>> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'
>>>
>>> I'
On 08.06.2018 23:58, lejeczek via users wrote:
> $ _def1="_me 1"
> $ rpmbuild --define=${_def1}
Try double quotes around your macro:
$ rpmbuild --define "${_def1}"
best regards
Ulf
___
users mailing list -- users@
On 08/06/18 16:39, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi,
lejeczek via users wrote:
how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg
rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'
I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working..
I mean, rpmbuild rushes to w
Hi,
lejeczek via users wrote:
> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg
>
> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'
>
> I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working..
> I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor
hi
how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg
rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'
I've been fiddling with ways to escape, but none is fricking working..
I mean, rpmbuild rushes to work(no errors nor failure) so if you try
just command line do not believ
Hi,
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package.
> Could you help me?
>
> I have been here
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
> I run
> rpmbuild -ba textext.spec
>
> Here is my file:
>
>
> Den 2018-02-09 kl. 15:45, skrev Patrick Dupre:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package.
> > Could you help me?
> >
> > I have been here
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
> >
Den 2018-02-09 kl. 15:45, skrev Patrick Dupre:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package.
> Could you help me?
>
> I have been here
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
> I run
> rpmbuild -ba textext.spec
>
Hello,
I am trying to create a rpm file from a tgz package.
Could you help me?
I have been here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
I run
rpmbuild -ba textext.spec
Here is my file:
Name: textext
Version:0.4
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 09:48:26PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file
In addition to the other reply, some stylistic points ...
> Group: Development/Libraries
This is not needed.
> BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-
robably an issue with the spec? because it does not say that it
> will provide
> perl(Forest)
Those are _automatic_ Provides adding during rpmbuild. Whether or not those
automatic Provides are added depends on the build environment contents. And
sometimes it can happen that the automatic
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 10:49 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:42:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > > > Can somebody tell me whatis wron
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:42:47 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > > Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file
> >
> > > I get:
> > > rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec
> > > error: Failed build dependencies:
> > > perl(Forest)
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 10:14 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:48:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can somebody tell me whatis
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:48:26 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can somebody tell me whatis wrong in the spec file
> I get:
> rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> perl(Forest) >= 0.06 is needed by
> perl-Gra
trick Dupre 0.67-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
I get:
rpmbuild -bb perl-Graphics-Primitive.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Forest) >= 0.06 is needed by
perl-Graphics-Primitive-0.67-1.fc26.noarch
perl(Geometry::Primitive) >= 0.16 is needed b
--with-xwidgets \
--with-modules %{?_with_all}
and rpmbuild invoked as:
rpmbuild ... --with all ...
(note the space between "with" and "all"). I think that's what's needed.
I'm mostly sure you also need to add a "bcond" stat
On 08/17/2017 07:14 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
>> I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with
>> the ensuing error:
>>
>> rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --w
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with
> the ensuing error:
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all
> rpmbuild: --without-all: unknown option
Looking at the
t; ./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --without-x
>>>
>>> and worked very well. So these are valid options. Don't know why
>>> rpmbuild doesn't like those. It would have been nice to have an rpm but
>>> I'll take what I can.
>>
>&g
> and worked very well. So these are valid options. Don't know why
>> rpmbuild doesn't like those. It would have been nice to have an rpm but
>> I'll take what I can.
>
>
> I don't think I was very clear.
>
> Yes, the options are valid for "co
Amadeus W.M. wrote:
Actually I compiled, out of curiosity, the tar file that came with the
srpm, with
./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --without-x
and worked very well. So these are valid options. Don't know why rpmbuild
doesn't like those. It would have been nice to h
On 08/17/2017 09:22 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> Actually I compiled, out of curiosity, the tar file that came with the
> srpm, with
>
> ./configure --without-all --with-x-toolkit=no --without-x
>
> and worked very well. So these are valid options. Don't know why rpmbuild
&
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:04:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/17/2017 07:50 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
>> I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this,
>> with the ensuing error:
>>
>> rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --w
On 08/17/2017 07:50 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with
> the ensuing error:
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all
> rpmbuild: --without-all: unknown option
>
> I untarre
I'm trying to put together a minimal emacs rpm and I'm trying this, with
the ensuing error:
rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-25.2-3.fc25.src.rpm --without-all
rpmbuild: --without-all: unknown option
I untarred the emacs source code and ran ./configure --help and --without-
all is an option.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:50:50AM -0400, Bill Shirley wrote:
> I just recently build a spec file for ndppd (NDP Proxy Daemon) and found out
> you can't comment out by using a single # in a spec file if it is a % command.
> It has to be like this:
> #%%configure
Yeah, this is because macros are ex
tabulate.c file
How can generate the package directly from the SOURCES?
with rpmbuild
I try to modify the .spc file by removing the
#%patch0 -p1 -b .refto
#%patch1 -p1 -b .font
#%patch3 -p1 -b .plot-sigsegv
#%patch4 -p1 -b .isinglethread
#%patch5 -p1 -b .checkint
#%patch6 -p1 -b .tabulate # Th
to a previous one).
Then a fixed directly the tabulate.c file
How can generate the package directly from the SOURCES?
with rpmbuild
I try to modify the .spc file by removing the
#%patch0 -p1 -b .refto
#%patch1 -p1 -b .font
#%patch3 -p1 -b .plot-sigsegv
#%patch4 -p1 -b .isinglethread
#%patch5 -p1 -b
How can generate the package directly from the SOURCES?
with rpmbuild
I try to modify the .spc file by removing the
#%patch0 -p1 -b .refto
#%patch1 -p1 -b .font
#%patch3 -p1 -b .plot-sigsegv
#%patch4 -p1 -b .isinglethread
#%patch5 -p1 -b .checkint
#%patch6 -p1 -b .tabulate # This fails
But
the tabulate.c file
How can generate the package directly from the SOURCES?
with rpmbuild
I try to modify the .spc file by removing the
#%patch0 -p1 -b .refto
#%patch1 -p1 -b .font
#%patch3 -p1 -b .plot-sigsegv
#%patch4 -p1 -b .isinglethread
#%patch5 -p1 -b .checkint
#%patch6 -p1 -b .tabulate
(maybe to a previous one).
> Then a fixed directly the tabulate.c file
>
> How can generate the package directly from the SOURCES?
> with rpmbuild
> I try to modify the .spc file by removing the
> #%patch0 -p1 -b .refto
> #%patch1 -p1 -b .font
> #%patch3 -p1 -b .plot-sigsegv
&g
package directly from the SOURCES?
with rpmbuild
I try to modify the .spc file by removing the
#%patch0 -p1 -b .refto
#%patch1 -p1 -b .font
#%patch3 -p1 -b .plot-sigsegv
#%patch4 -p1 -b .isinglethread
#%patch5 -p1 -b .checkint
#%patch6 -p1 -b .tabulate # This fails
But it does not work.
because
ue, France
===
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 at 1:48 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:58:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > rpmbuil
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:58:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> rpmbuild -bb
> and I got the following error message:
> RPM build errors:
> File not found:
> /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PAR-Packer-1.035-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/*
> File not foun
Hello,
I tried to build my own package perl-PAR-Packer from
Url: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/
(see rpmfind.net)
I run cpanspec
and then
rpmbuild -bb
and I got the following error message:
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PAR-Packer-1.035-1
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 20:24:05 +0200 Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray
> > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a
> > rpm and perhaps an
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:06:46 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> Looking at that, I'm wondering if your line 31 in the "%install"
> section should read:
>
> /bin/python3 setup.py install --prefix=%{_prefix} --root=%{buildroot}
>
> As it is now, it's depending on a relative path that gets expande
On 3 October 2016 at 15:38, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as
> a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm
> and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
>
> I have created the following spec
On 10/03/2016 10:04 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
>> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
>>> battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:44:41 -0700 stan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Sorry, here is the corrected
> >
> > $ fpaste battray.spec
> > Uploading (1.6KiB)...
> > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ ->
> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:04:31 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Sorry, here is the corrected
>
> $ fpaste battray.spec
> Uploading (1.6KiB)...
> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714/ ->
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442684/51425714
I think this is still wrong. It might not be the probl
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
> > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it
> > together as a rpm and perhaps
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:30:44 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray
> > as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a
> > rpm and perhaps and g
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:34:39 -0700 stan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
> > battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it
> > together as a rpm and perhaps
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:38:01 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across
> battray as a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it
> together as a rpm and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
>
> I have created the followi
On 10/03/2016 06:38 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as
> a replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm
> and perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
>
> I have created the following spec fi
Hi,
I have had issues with batti for quite a while, and I came across battray as a
replacement (and it works). So, I was trying to put it together as a rpm and
perhaps and get it approved for Fedora.
I have created the following spec file available here:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/442597/
et is :
> Found '/home/adrian/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/clhep-2.3.3.2-1.x86_64' in
> installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status
> from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.tOmNW2 (%install)
>
> i imagine that it is a problem of setting the buildroot but have no
> idea how this translate t
Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to
package.
It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here:
https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec
the error that i get is :
Found '/home/adrian/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/clhep-2.3.3.2-1.x86_64' in
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo