Hi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
>
> The original, too-widely formulated statement was:
>
> "... or requires users to modify files below /usr is broken by design."
>
It is just restating what FHS tries to convey that all user modified
configuration should live
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > make menuconfig will modify a configuration file, placed below
> > /usr.
>
>
> That isn't a RPM package placing those configuration files however. So the
> need to override it just
Hi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
>
>
> make menuconfig will modify a configuration file, placed below
> /usr.
That isn't a RPM package placing those configuration files however. So the
need to override it just isn't there.
> Similar for texlive, where you can
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
>
> > Instead of having to guess at the meaning, why not just state the
> > intention without the absolutism?
> I don't think anyone else was confused about what the meaning was.
Neither am I. I
Hi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
> Instead of having to guess at the meaning, why not just state the
> intention without the absolutism?
I don't think anyone else was confused about what the meaning was.
> And depending on the definition of
> what a configurat
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> Hi
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
>
> >
> > The specific wording: "requires users to modify files below /usr".
> >
>
> I am not sure picking up some words without the context is useful. If you
> read the full email, it was obvious
Hi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
>
> The specific wording: "requires users to modify files below /usr".
>
I am not sure picking up some words without the context is useful. If you
read the full email, it was obviously talking about configuration files.
Rahul
--
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 07/22/2014 12:26 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
> > Ralf Corsepius writes:
> >
> >> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> >> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> >> is broken by design.
> >
> > Both python a
On 07/22/2014 12:26 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with mechanisms to add their resp
Hi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Anders Wegge Kelle wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius writes:
>
> > A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> > files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> > is broken by design.
>
> Both python and perl come with me
Ralf Corsepius writes:
> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with mechanisms to add their respective
native packages under /usr/lib/... Do you c
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:03:39 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> is broken by design.
Agreed, but I don't seem to fully understand your point here. Are you
sug
> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr is
> broken by design.
pls don't start it.
I could find anything else. The only reason I've found systemd because I
worked with it nowadays.
--
users
On 07/22/2014 02:42 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Whether this is FSH-compliant or not, I don't know. Some people say it
is, some people say it is not, most of the people don't really care. :-)
The difference is:
Files outside of /etc are not supposed to modified by users or admins.
I.e. shippin
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:26:57 +0100
Balint Szigeti wrote:
> Why doesn't system respect FSH? What is its benefit?
[snip]
> I think, the config files should store in /etc instead of everywhere
> else. The chroot applications are exceptions. It cause we MUST
> mount /usr in / (root) partion.
The _Ne
Why doesn't system respect FSH? What is its benefit?
Cite man 7 hier
..
/usr/lib
Object libraries, including dynamic libraries, plus some
executables which usually are not invoked directly. More complicated
pro‐
grams may have whole subdirectories there.
16 matches
Mail list logo
