On 24 August 2017 at 10:33, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> >> Hello Fedora devels and users,
> >>
> >> more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we
> >> want
> >> this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion res
On 18 Aug 2017 4:42 pm, "Jakub Jelen" wrote:
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Hello Fedora devels and users,
>
> more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we
> want
> this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resulted
> mostly in flames
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 13:15 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> For the record, denyhosts currently relies upon the tcp_wrappers
> functionality in openssh to function. While it's possible to make it
> manipulate the firewall as well, the whole situation is kind of a
> mess.
> (Does it talk to fi
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Hello Fedora devels and users,
>
> more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we
> want
> this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resulted
> mostly in flames and in the removal of the dependency on tcp_w
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 08:22 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:58:16 +0200
> Jakub Jelen wrote:
>
> > Thank you for comments and constructive ideas.
>
> I certainly never understood why it existed at all, unless maybe
> it pre-dated having a firewall. It seems totally redundant
>
Tom Horsley writes:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:58:16 +0200
Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Thank you for comments and constructive ideas.
I certainly never understood why it existed at all, unless maybe
it pre-dated having a firewall. It seems totally redundant
to the firewall.
tcp_wrappers was useful. A l
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:58:16 +0200
Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Thank you for comments and constructive ideas.
I certainly never understood why it existed at all, unless maybe
it pre-dated having a firewall. It seems totally redundant
to the firewall.
___
users
Hello Fedora devels and users,
more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we want
this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resulted
mostly in flames and in the removal of the dependency on tcp_wrappers
from systemd. But it was quite agreed that it is considere
