[...]
>>
>> And thats the right thing to do IM(NS)HO.
>
> Not really, but it's for sure a useful feature, yet it can be annoying
> at times.
>
> To be clear, I never wanted to remove multi-line regex support, just add
> an option for single-line ones.
Yeah, if you have both its fine, multi-line ca
Le 01/08/2014 03:00, Lex Trotman a écrit :
> On 1 August 2014 04:27, Colomban Wendling wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> For technical reasons, and because although I started some work for
>> line-based RE support, I didn't finish it (yet).
>>
>> If you're interested in the technical reason, it's quite simple
On 1 August 2014 19:39, Péter wrote:
> Colomban Wendling wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you experience the same?
>>
>> Yes
>
>
>> use "anything but Q or newline": [^Q\r\n]
>
>
> OK, I accept it.
>
> [^Q\n]*Q
> works. (Finds only inside one line.)
We were not sure what you were actually trying to achieve, but
Colomban Wendling wrote:
Do you experience the same?
Yes
use "anything but Q or newline": [^Q\r\n]
OK, I accept it.
[^Q\n]*Q
works. (Finds only inside one line.)
Lex Trotman wrote:
though you can set flags in the regex (?m).
I did not really succeed to use it. (I found the
http://www.
