Re: memcpy_cpu on 64bit arm

Hello, On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 15:56:48 CET, Michael Grunditz wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 14:15, Michael Grunditz > wrote: > > Anyway init crashes somewhere. > > > > 2043 MiB RAM and 64533 caps assigned to init > > no RM attachment (READ pf_addr=0x81 pf_ip=0x9f3f4 from pager_object: > > pd='

Re: ath9k usb Wi-Fi driver

Josef, > […] Admittedly I was also thinking of some unusual scenarios, such as > > multiple wifi adapters where it makes sense to have one supplicant and > > multiple drivers. But that's strange enough maybe it doesn't need to > > be supported. > > At least from my perspective I would rather treat

Re: memcpy_cpu on 64bit arm

On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 14:15, Michael Grunditz wrote: > > > I have something that seems to work, even though I get a crash from > > test-log that I haven't solved. > > It could be because the .S file is built in every component. So the > > question is, where do I put it!?! > > It needs to live in

Re: vbox6 challenges: Error: VDIfTcpNetInstDefaultDestroy not implemented

Hi Dan, I got pass this error by pasting hard disk UUID in to different locations , at the very top and at the very bottom. Now I am getting the vbox6 windows to come up but with a message: FATAL: No bootable medium Found! System halted. I tried changing the storage controller from SATA to IDE

Re: memcpy_cpu on 64bit arm

> I have something that seems to work, even though I get a crash from > test-log that I haven't solved. > It could be because the .S file is built in every component. So the > question is, where do I put it!?! > It needs to live in "base", I guess. But I don't know how. The rest of > the system doe

Re: ath9k usb Wi-Fi driver

Hello Colin, > Good to hear. Was this done with the changes I made to the supplicant > interface? I'm curious if those break the existing wifi functionality, > which I can't test other than to say it compiles successfully. No, in this case I simply enabled the driver in the vanilla 'pc_wifi_drv'

Re: memcpy_cpu on 64bit arm

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 20:15, Michael Grunditz wrote: > > > There is no particular reason why the implementation is (i.e. "was") > > empty. You can find a recent commit on the staging branch that applies a > > few obvious optimisations to all architectures, though: > > https://github.com/genodelab

Re: revisit past discussions

Hi Johnny , I was talking only about Github. I'm not experienced with the mail archive as I have no need for it. But I'm glad you found a solution. Cheers, Martin On 23.01.23 05:13, Johnny Nunez wrote: > Hi Martin, > >   > > Maybe this is the link you mention: users (mail-archive.com) >