Great bug, Thanks!
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Reade
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 11:36 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] function/method comparison
Hi, we have another bug report. This one's a
Hi, we have another bug report. This one's a bit longer...
In IronPythonConsole (0.9.6):
--
IronPython 0.9.6 on .NET 2.0.50727.42
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> class C:
... def f(self):
... pass
Instantiate away – the API will be
the same.
-
Keith J. Farmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeff sacksteder
Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2005
07:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPyt
We implemented support for site.py, but beyond that we didn't add support for
other means of configuration via app.config.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Davis
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:31 AM
To: Discussion of IronP
Hello all,
I'm trying to use IronPython in interactive mode to do odd database
tasks against my C# DAL. All my connection strings are stored in an
.config file, and the DAL looks there for it. I did some googling on
using an app.config with ironpython, and found an old debate on here
about e
I'm sorry, I meant in Python.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Thanks a lot for all the suggestions.
I think IronPython is a great thing and I am looking forward for production
release.
I am using Abstract Factory and Bridge patterns for my scripting features,
so for now I will use Boo, and as soon as IronPython 1.0 will be released I
will switch implementat
