Re: [IronPython] pybench results for CPython and IronPython

2007-04-21 Thread M. David Peterson
On 4/21/07, luismg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For me, the difference between python's dynamicity and Boo is simply that python allows for a more exploratory way of development. I *LOVE* it! :D > http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/04/qotdluisironpythondevlist_pyth.html -- /M:D M. David

Re: [IronPython] pybench results for CPython and IronPython

2007-04-21 Thread luismg
I also I agree with you two. Boo is an extremelly nice and productive static language, and its syntax is so similar to Python's that waisting time deciding what to choose for a given task is almost non-sense. I think the decision should be made based on platform and libraries to be used mainly and,

Re: [IronPython] pybench results for CPython and IronPython

2007-04-21 Thread M. David Peterson
I agree, Boo is a nice language, but given its foundation as a statically-typed language it's not exactly a one-to-one comparison. Of course you can always use the duck type capabilities to gain a similar dynamic effect, but even a Boo duck type doesn't provide a fair one-to-one as you still have