So then why not read the source code, get some ideas, possibly use some of
the code if it makes sense as such, and include a copy of the license and
copyright notice with your redistribution to cover your legal requirements.
Of course if the project was GPL'd, which is incompatible (as far as I k
On 6/1/07, M. David Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/1/07, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Independent rediscovery" does not protect you from claims of patent
> infringement, only from copyright infringement.
>
Unless I am misreading, it seems you are suggesting that the
On 6/1/07, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People who are simply *using* IronPython are covered by the license.
Well them, and those who want "to make, have made, use, sell, offer for
sale, import, and/or otherwise dispose of its contribution in the software
or derivative works o
On 6/1/07, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The license associated with IronPython is quite specific about patent
rights. Microsoft treats its licenses very seriously. In my opinion,
there's nothing to worry about here.
People who are simply *using* IronPython are covered by the licen
*VERY* well stated, Tim!
On 6/1/07, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:41:19 -0400, "Eric Nicholson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm also not a lawyer, but...
>
> I previously would have agreed about the protections in the license, but
> until the whole claim of 135 P
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:41:19 -0400, "Eric Nicholson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm also not a lawyer, but...
>
> I previously would have agreed about the protections in the license, but
> until the whole claim of 135 Patent violations in Linux clears up, I'm not
> sure. MS Legal needs to prove t
On 01/06/07, Luis Trigueiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Great stuff very good.
I would like to do Excel-Addin using IronPython.
Although, IIUC an Excel-Addin is different from the Excel automation recipe
already there - so anything you can add would be *most* welcome.
Thanks
Michael
ht
Martin Maly wrote:
> Thanks for a fun bug, Michael, just to clarify, this is using the IronPython
> 1.1 release, correct?
>
Yes. Given the performance degradation (on XP) and the lack of multiple
engine support we can't switch to 2.0 yet...
Are bugfixes still being ported to the 1.X branch?
Thanks Michael! This has been filed as CodePlex Work Item #10710
(http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=10710).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 7:13 AM
To: Discussion of
Luis Trigueiros wrote:
> Hi,
> Great stuff very good.
> I would like to do Excel-Addin using IronPython.
> Does anyone done this, this would be a good recipe for the Cookbook.
It would certainly be useful - but you have competition!
http://www.ironpython.info/index.php/Interacting_with_Excel
Than
Hi,
Great stuff very good.
I would like to do Excel-Addin using IronPython.
Does anyone done this, this would be a good recipe for the Cookbook.
Thanks, Luis
On 5/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IronPython Wiki Cookbook
[image: emoticon:nightmare] One of the things I've be
Thanks for a fun bug, Michael, just to clarify, this is using the IronPython
1.1 release, correct?
If it is of any consolation, this is the output from the IronPython 2.0 alpha
where this no longer happens:
IronPython console: IronPython 2.0 (2.0.0.0) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
Copyright (c) Microsof
Hello all,
Another fun one. If you use 'property' to wrap a lambda in a class
namespace then an extra name leaks into the class namespace (which
confused our documentation system).
CPython:
>>> class X(object):
... p2 = property(lambda self: 34)
...
>>> dir(X)
['__class__', '__delattr__', '_
Hello all,
More fun with None, this time with the standard library - specifically
with 'os.path.abspath':
CPython:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.abspath(None)
'C:\\Program Files\\Python24'
>>>
IronPython:
>>> import os
>>> os.path.abspath(None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File , line
On 6/1/07, Eric Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm also not a lawyer, but...
I previously would have agreed about the protections in the license, but
until the whole claim of 135 Patent violations in Linux clears up, I'm not
sure. MS Legal needs to prove that they can be trusted.
You
I'm also not a lawyer, but...
I previously would have agreed about the protections in the license, but
until the whole claim of 135 Patent violations in Linux clears up, I'm not
sure. MS Legal needs to prove that they can be trusted.
-Eric
On 5/31/07, M. David Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Thanks guys - and thanks for the plug. Don't forget to post useful stuff!
There is already some new user content (good stuff too), which is
encouraging.
Fuzzyman
On 01/06/07, M. David Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This *ROCKS*! Hopefully this >
http://www.oreillynet.com/windows/blog/200
17 matches
Mail list logo