Hi there!
Is this the correct forum for questions about the DLR, or is there a
separate DLR mailing list somewhere?
Cheers,
Ben
Ben Young - Senior Software Engineer
SunGard - Enterprise House, Vision Park, Histon, Cambridge, CB24 9ZR
Tel +44 1223 266042 - Main +44 1223 266100 - http://
The only problem I can see arises when none of your bugs are deemed "trivial".
:)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dino Viehland
Sent: Mon 11/12/2007 9:46 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Pet peeve
There's another school of though
2007/11/9, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For whatever reasons, IronPython 2.0 Alpha 6 started to invoke
> delegate to abstract method. (Previous versions didn't.) This
> triggered Mono bug 317488 which is apparently hard to fix.
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317488
Thankfull
Hi Dino,
I'm very excite that the final hosting api will be freezed and support
multiple instances of engines, I have waited a long time, hope your work
going well.
Andy Tao
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dino Viehland
Sent: Tuesday, Nov
Cool - and thanks Dino. Although we ship sources to our customers we
distribute our betas as binaries so we are dependent on it.
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Awesome, I have no clue exactly when we'll bring it back (unfortunately we
> have a lot of dependencies on
Awesome, I have no clue exactly when we'll bring it back (unfortunately we have
a lot of dependencies on not doing it right now - every occurance of
RuntimeConstant needs to be removed) but it's good to know that it's a pressing
need for you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Do you mean the hacky static compilation which lets you create real .NET
> types or the pyc pre-compile support? Hopefully it's the latter as I'm not
> sure the former will ever come back.
>
>
The latter. :-)
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Do you mean the hacky static compilation which lets you create real .NET types
or the pyc pre-compile support? Hopefully it's the latter as I'm not sure the
former will ever come back.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent:
That's great! Once you have added static compilation back into IP 2 we
might be able to start using it at Resolver. :-)
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
Dino Viehland wrote:
> It won't be this week: we have a lot more than 1 week of work to do - both
> Tomas and I are working on hosting thi
On 11/12/07, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I guess now is as good as any time to announce that we're going to support
> multiple instances of engines in a single app domain.
I'm spectacularly happy about this; thanks for letting us know! :)
--
Curt Hagenlocher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It won't be this week: we have a lot more than 1 week of work to do - both
Tomas and I are working on hosting this week and next, and then more in a
month, and probably more still in the coming months. But the plan is that this
will be the final hosting API modulo any small tweaks based upon is
Dino Viehland wrote:
> It's technically over (now it's hosting API feature development week) but I
> still have 2 check-ins that aren't in yet. I'll include this in one of those.
>
Ah - great. When this week is over can you freeze the API so that I can
write about it... ;-)
Michael
http://w
It's technically over (now it's hosting API feature development week) but I
still have 2 check-ins that aren't in yet. I'll include this in one of those.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:21 A
Thanks for the bug report, and sorry for missing the original mail.
This is a bug in a code path that will ultimately be going away - currently we
still have a mix of code paths that use the new DynamicSite and Rules mechanism
and the old interface / PythonType (Formerly DynamicType) / CLR type
There's another school of thought that we should just fix them as they come in.
But fixing them in-bulk certainly gives me a warm fuzzy feeling. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Murphy
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:17 AM
To: D
Is trivial bugs week over yet?
Please fix
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=5814
This came to my attention thanks to a patch by Hajime Nakagami. The
bug is nearly a year old, and can only be explained by sloppiness.
Well, we all make mistakes...
Please fix it in bo
There as no answer to this - so I have raised it as codeplex issue
13820:
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
On Nov 3, 12:26 am, Michael Foord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> A bug in '__getattribute__' - magic methods should be fetched from the
> class and not go through '__getattr
On 10/11/2007, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Fix Trivial Bugs Week"?
>
> I like that idea. Start a movement around it!
Its a winner - well actually its not since there's a weight of
argument that says that the trivial ones are possibly the ones that
should get hit first, or at lea
18 matches
Mail list logo
