Well IsolatedStorage probably isn't good enough. The problem is we actually
save a real .NET assembly to disk and do so using reflection - which is the
only way this offers any benefits - the slow part is generally compilation. So
Reflection.Emit would have to support IsolatedStorage for this
There's a reference for the TextRange object at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb251500.aspx. It doesn't look like
it supports any events. From what I can tell, all the events for PowerPoint
are defined on the Application object:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb251405.aspx. Pe
> There's a couple of plans a foot. We have been working on a pre-compilation
> feature like .pyc for IronPython 2.0 It's actually in Beta 3 but
> unfortunately it doesn't quite work yet which is the reason we haven't said
> anything. It will be there (and working!) in beta 4.
Wow, looking f
There's a couple of plans a foot. We have been working on a pre-compilation
feature like .pyc for IronPython 2.0 It's actually in Beta 3 but unfortunately
it doesn't quite work yet which is the reason we haven't said anything. It
will be there (and working!) in beta 4. That's the short term
In my experience IronPython 2 is fast, I find it to be 3x CPython for
some common tasks like serialization.
But one area where it still lags way behind is module importing. I've
noticed module importing to be an order of magnitude, over 20x, slower
in most cases.
I've got to think that if it's so
Hello,
I'm new at Ironpython, I've been looking at a way to interact
dynamically with PowerPoint.
I got some simple code to work to access the text in a box which is
selected in PowerPoint:
import clr
from System.Runtime.InteropServices import Marshal
clr.AddReference("Microsoft.Office.Int
What's wrong with good old SharpDevelop? If you grab a recent build
from the build server it comes with IronPython 1.1, C#, VB.NET, Boo
and F# support out of the box. I have been using this for all my .NET
development needs. I'm not 100% certain if you can use the .NET
debugger with IronPython, and
Michael Stephens wrote:
My main reason for using Irony Python is that break points will get
hit. Do these other IDE's support break points.
We are using the embedded PythonEngine class. I found that if you
launched our application from VS it would attach the debugger and
actually debug our
That's really the only "IronPython debugging" solution, unless there's some
other IDE that supports .NET debugging (MonoDevelop?).
~js
On 6/24/08 3:22 PM, "Michael Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My main reason for using Irony Python is that break points will get hit. Do
these other IDE
My main reason for using Irony Python is that break points will get hit. Do
these other IDE's support break points.
We are using the embedded PythonEngine class. I found that if you launched
our application from VS it would attach the debugger and actually debug our
python code even though its h
Michael Stephens wrote:
It looks like the *only* way intellisense will pickup is if everything
is in one file. A moderate workaround except for the lack of class
navigator+function navigator
You are likely to find the intellisense in Python IDEs like Wing and
Komodo much better. They don't h
It looks like the *only* way intellisense will pickup is if everything is in
one file. A moderate workaround except for the lack of class
navigator+function navigator
Michael Stephens
Electrical Engineering Graduate Student
University of Wyoming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Ju
Michael Stephens wrote:
I should be able to just say
dbg("test") should present intellisense at least for what dbg takes
as an argument.
"import" in Python is not the same as the C# using directive. If you do
the following:
import RT
Then you can only access members of the RT module us
I should be able to just say
dbg("test") should present intellisense at least for what dbg takes as an
argument.
Michael Stephens
Electrical Engineering Graduate Student
University of Wyoming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTE
I don't understand from your description what you expect to see in "Problem
2".
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Michael Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have two instances where I can't get intellisense to work. Is it
> something I am doing or something wrong with Python Studio. I have
Take a look at
http://blogs.msdn.com/ironpython/archive/2008/03/16/dlr-resources.aspx as well
for a list of useful links.
Thanks,
Shri
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 7:31 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [
The DLR is pretty sparsely documented today. Some of the available
resources are the hosting spec:
http://compilerlab.members.winisp.net/dlr-spec-hosting.pdf
And some blogs that talk about implementing languages on the DLR:
http://blogs.msdn.com/mmaly/
http://www.dotnetguru.org/us/dlrus/DLR2.htm
Despite "locals" being involved, 16884 is not a related issue. The problem
in 16884 is with the delegate that's created for function a and the way
that it's bound to the context in which the function was declared. And
alas, 16884 is not fixed in beta 3.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Jonatha
Does this mean that issue 16884 will be fixed as well in beta 3?
2008/6/24 Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It seems to be fixed in beta 3. It's probably a bug in the interpreter as
> writing the snippet out and executing w/ execfile, which doesn't run under
> the interpreter, works in beta
19 matches
Mail list logo
