Re: [IronPython] repr() results with uint, etc.

2009-02-07 Thread Michael Foord
Dino Viehland wrote: And the correct change to the source code would be adding __repr__ methods to the various *Ops types (Int16Ops, UInt16Ops, etc...) which return the correct formatting. Presumably by updating the scripts that generate these types. OTOH there's nothing particularly unsafe

Re: [IronPython] repr() results with uint, etc.

2009-02-07 Thread Jeff Slutter
I totally agree that it should be done the right way - I didn't know what the right way was. CodePlex issue has been opened: 21040 Thanks! Dino Viehland wrote: And the correct change to the source code would be adding __repr__ methods to the various *Ops types (Int16Ops, UInt16Ops, etc...)

Re: [IronPython] repr() results with uint, etc.

2009-02-07 Thread Dino Viehland
At least one of those is now fixed in 2.0.1 2.6 (http://www.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPythonWorkItemId=20632) The other one I know of is __index__ support, are there more? Seems like doing these all at once makes sense. -Original Message- From: