Thanks for explaining.
--
From: Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:33 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Embedding Charsets
Igor Elyas wrote:
Interesting
Hello Python Community,
We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1. As you might
imagine, this release is all about supporting new CPython 2.6 features such as
the 'bytes' and 'bytearray' types (PEP 3112), decorators for classes (PEP
3129), advanced string formatting (PEP
Why do you need to cast to the base class? All of the members you need should
already be there.
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Carolyn Johnston
(MSNAR)
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Users@lists.ironpython.com
Dave,
This is great news, congratulations to the IP team on this release!
We'll do a test-port of Resolver One early next week and will reply to
the list with any issues we find.
Cheers,
Giles
Dave Fugate wrote:
Hello Python Community,
We’re pleased to announce the release of
You are right, I didn't need to do the cast - was just transcribing some C#
code that did that for some reason.
However, it is still a good question (instead of upcasting, think of
downcasting), and the answer isn't out there that I could find.
Thanks, Carolyn
Carolyn Johnston (carolj)
Lead
The Python object will always reflect the underlying .NET type, so you never
need to upcast or downcast.
2009/3/26 Carolyn Johnston (MSNAR) car...@microsoft.com
You are right, I didn’t need to do the cast – was just transcribing some
C# code that did that for some reason.
However, it is
