[IronPython] intellisense (Re: Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1)

2009-03-29 Thread Toni Alatalo
Leighton Haynes kirjoitti: I have to say – Intellisense is very high on our wishlist – we have many developers unfamiliar with Python, and Intellisense would ease the transition a lot. Has anyone looked at implementing this yet? I haven't looked at what IronPy studio or any other ironpy t

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread Leighton Haynes
I have to say - Intellisense is very high on our wishlist - we have many developers unfamiliar with Python, and Intellisense would ease the transition a lot. Cheers, Leighton Haynes Gemcom Software International From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.c

Re: [IronPython] try...finally in yield

2009-03-29 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
Maybe I don't understand the problem you're having. Can you describe it with a little more detail? When exactly do you want the file to be closed? 2009/3/29 Adam Brand > We are using 2.0 beta I think as part of ipy for asp.net. I don’t think > close() is implemented in that version… Am I wron

Re: [IronPython] try...finally in yield

2009-03-29 Thread Adam Brand
We are using 2.0 beta I think as part of ipy for asp.net. I don't think close() is implemented in that version. Am I wrong? Harry (who made it) suggested this: def _process(xr): while xr.Read(): xr.MoveToContent() node = XmlNode(xr) yield node if xr.IsEmptyElement: node

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread Adam Brand
I think that was directed at Dody.but now that you mention it, I'm sure there would be more adopters if there was more momentum behind ipy for asp.net rather than just ipy with intellisense. I suspect more people are developing web apps than not. Adam Adam Brand SilverKey Technologies

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread Howland-Rose, Kyle
I suggest that intellisense is a productivity feature. I know that is how it is considered where I work. Is productivity cosmetic? Massively :) From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of cur...@acm.org Sent

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread cur...@acm.org
Intellisense is a cosmetic feature at best. It's obviously nice to have, but it can't actually be *that* important to anyone...it's not like the information isn't available via other means. 2009/3/29 Howland-Rose, Kyle > Hi Adam, > > About "intellisense is not a major blocker for iron python a

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread Howland-Rose, Kyle
Hi Adam, About "intellisense is not a major blocker for iron python adoption". Unfortunately I think it might be. The commercial world is all about productivity. I did a survey at work about replacing a well-known development environment with eclipse and the result was "our only real requirem

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread Dody Gunawinata
I think the fact that there are more users for "Assembly for Web Pages" and "AJAX on ALGOL" than IronPython for ASP.Net contributes to the delay in updates. It's too bad for us that got addicted to the elegance of the solution in the first place. I remember a couple of months ago about updated supp