We're picking up the RST files that IronPython documentation is based upon. We
have a tree structure which currently includes the unmodified docs and a
modified version which is updated w/ new IronPython specific content and tweaks
to some of the existing content where things differ. We can th
There's no general way to be ensure the RHS will be invoked
for a binding in particular due to the issues you've come up with.
It's also problematic for IronPython to ask the RHS to do
the binding when the LHS is not an IDMOP because the operations may
not be symmetric. Really we'll need to add s
Hi Justin, this is definitely a valid bug; thanks for reporting it. We’re
supposed to ignore any methods named GetMember/SetMember/DeleteMember unless
they define the [SpecialName] attribute, but we fail to account for cases where
there could be overloads. This is because the default binder call
Thanks, Mark. That's all really good stuff, and essentially we are already
doing the same things in our app.
Where the problem comes in for me (I've narrowed it down a little bit) is
that the IronPython binding code looks for a method called "SetMember" when
I attempt to set an attribute. My class
Hi,
I have the following C# code:
public class MyObject : IDynamicMetaObjectProvider {
int value;
public MyObject(int value) { this.value = value; }
static public int operator *(int left, MyObject right) { return left *
right.value; }
static public int operator *(MyObject left, i
Hello to all,
over many years I have forced to implement a test automation scenerie in
our company.
Now they will do it and - who hat thougth that - I've got the job! And I
had to bring the job to success!
My Environment:
I've succesfully presented a test automation sol
On 19/02/2010 08:04, David Jensen wrote:
I just ran into silvershell, and I have not tried it yet. I looks like it has
all the autocompletion that Idle has. I am wondering why no work has been done
on it for one year. It is a tremendous idea. Google has a browser shell for
app engine, but it does
On 19/02/2010 08:04, David Jensen wrote:
I just ran into silvershell, and I have not tried it yet. I looks like it has
all the autocompletion that Idle has. I am wondering why no work has been done
on it for one year. It is a tremendous idea. Google has a browser shell for
app engine, but it does
Aight, thanks a lot for your answer!
On Feb 19, 2010 8:38 AM, "Curt Hagenlocher" wrote:
The short answer is "no, that's not possible".
This is effectively a version of the halting problem (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem). For an arbitrary script, you
can check its syntax for corr
The short answer is "no, that's not possible".
This is effectively a version of the halting problem (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem). For an arbitrary script, you
can check its syntax for correctness without executing fairly easily. Other
errors are potentially detectable as long as
I just ran into silvershell, and I have not tried it yet. I looks like it has
all the autocompletion that Idle has. I am wondering why no work has been done
on it for one year. It is a tremendous idea. Google has a browser shell for
app engine, but it does not have autocompletion, as far as I know.
I would like auto completion for ironpython, similar to autocompletion in
Idle. How can this be done? I particularly want it for Silverlight.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
