Re: [IronPython] If not IronPython, what?

2010-08-18 Thread Catherine Devlin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Max Yaffe wrote: > I've been reading the buzz around Microsoft's reduced commitment to Iron* > languages and wondering if I should rethink my own commitment to > IronPython. > I think you're panicking prematurely. It sounds like the IronRuby team is down to one

[IronPython] Iron VB??

2010-08-18 Thread Joshua Kramer
That said, there's always a possibility for Iron VB. Talk about closing Wow. Iron VB? They shoud just call it Microsoft Lead: toxic, heavy, and useless for making anything except those things that destroy other things (bullets, or VB Applications). -- - http://www.globalherald.net/j

Re: [IronPython] If not IronPython, what?

2010-08-18 Thread Lukáš Duběda
Hi there, well, honestly, you're at least in a possition where you can make a choice. We here are, on the other hand, solely dependant on IPy. There are no alternatives to what we're using here at the studio. But even still, I think IPy is such a powerful tool that even if Microsoft ditched its

[IronPython] If not IronPython, what?

2010-08-18 Thread Max Yaffe
I've been reading the buzz around Microsoft's reduced commitment to Iron* languages and wondering if I should rethink my own commitment to IronPython. To fill you in, I'm a designer of instruments and software for scientific data acquisition and analysis. My current software uses a dynamic languag

Re: [IronPython] Chasing memory leak in IronPython scripts

2010-08-18 Thread Dino Viehland
Also you might want to compare private bytes vs. the size of the GC heap (in perfmon) to get an idea if it's an unmanaged or managed leak given this is involving interop. One possibility is also that the finalizer thread is being blocked from cleaning up STA COM objects. You could try running

Re: [IronPython] WPF / ipy: renewing data binding? Could use some guidance.

2010-08-18 Thread Ken MacDonald
Yep. seems to have no effect. Ken On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Lukas Cenovsky wrote: > Have you tried manually refreshing the CollectionView after update by > CollectionView.Refresh()? > > -- > -- Lukáš > > > > On 18.8.2010 17:35, Ken MacDonald wrote: > > I have inherited a WPF/ipy app whic

Re: [IronPython] WPF / ipy: renewing data binding? Could use some guidance.

2010-08-18 Thread Lukas Cenovsky
Have you tried manually refreshing the CollectionView after update by CollectionView.Refresh()? -- -- Lukás( On 18.8.2010 17:35, Ken MacDonald wrote: I have inherited a WPF/ipy app which is using data binding / CollectionView to interact with a customer list. Steps are roughly: 1. query cu

[IronPython] IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source Update

2010-08-18 Thread merllab
This is an automated email letting you know that sources have recently been pushed out. You can download these newer sources directly from http://ironpython.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/75792. DELETED SOURCES $/IronPython/IronPython_Main/Tools/IronStudio/Bin MODIFIED SOUR

[IronPython] WPF / ipy: renewing data binding? Could use some guidance.

2010-08-18 Thread Ken MacDonald
I have inherited a WPF/ipy app which is using data binding / CollectionView to interact with a customer list. Steps are roughly: 1. query cust. list from DB, sorted by name 2. bind this to a CollectionView 3. step through the list, displaying 1 cust. at a time using the CollectionView.Next/Previou

Re: [IronPython] Hosting IronPython in Silverlight - background loading

2010-08-18 Thread Jimmy Schementi
Lukas, this is the bug in Microsoft.Scripting.Silverlight. Because you do "setup.HostType = typeof(Microsoft.Scripting.Silverlight.BrowserScriptHost)", all file-system lookups (like looking for a module) go through that type. ~Jimmy On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Lukas Cenovsky wrote: > Look

Re: [IronPython] Hosting IronPython in Silverlight - background loading

2010-08-18 Thread Lukas Cenovsky
Looks like there is a bug in DynamicEngine. When I tried the old way, it works: private void UserControl_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs ev) {     IPloader = new BackgroundWorker();     IPloader.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler((s, e) =>