On 18.8.2010 7:25, yngipy hernan wrote:
Hi All,
I have an IronPython script that is using/talking to COM server. I am
not sure if I have a memory leak but the IronPython Private Byte keeps
on growing. I haven't seen it run of memory but I might be leaking memory.
Essential I am using an
Looks like there is a bug in DynamicEngine. When I tried the old
way, it works:
private void UserControl_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs
ev)
{
IPloader = new BackgroundWorker();
IPloader.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler((s, e) =
Lukas, this is the bug in Microsoft.Scripting.Silverlight. Because you
do setup.HostType
= typeof(Microsoft.Scripting.Silverlight.BrowserScriptHost), all
file-system lookups (like looking for a module) go through that type.
~Jimmy
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Lukas Cenovsky
I have inherited a WPF/ipy app which is using data binding / CollectionView
to interact with a customer list. Steps are roughly:
1. query cust. list from DB, sorted by name
2. bind this to a CollectionView
3. step through the list, displaying 1 cust. at a time using the
This is an automated email letting you know that sources
have recently been pushed out. You can download these newer
sources directly from
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/75792.
DELETED SOURCES
$/IronPython/IronPython_Main/Tools/IronStudio/Bin
MODIFIED
Have you tried manually refreshing the CollectionView after update by
CollectionView.Refresh()?
--
-- Lukás(
On 18.8.2010 17:35, Ken MacDonald wrote:
I have inherited a WPF/ipy app which is using data binding /
CollectionView to interact with a customer list. Steps are roughly:
1. query
Yep. seems to have no effect.
Ken
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Lukas Cenovsky cenov...@bakalari.czwrote:
Have you tried manually refreshing the CollectionView after update by
CollectionView.Refresh()?
--
-- Lukáš
On 18.8.2010 17:35, Ken MacDonald wrote:
I have inherited a
Also you might want to compare private bytes vs. the size of the GC heap
(in perfmon) to get an idea if it's an unmanaged or managed leak given
this is involving interop.
One possibility is also that the finalizer thread is being blocked from
cleaning up STA COM objects. You could try running
I've been reading the buzz around Microsoft's reduced commitment to Iron*
languages and wondering if I should rethink my own commitment to IronPython.
To fill you in, I'm a designer of instruments and software for scientific
data acquisition and analysis. My current software uses a dynamic
Hi there,
well, honestly, you're at least in a possition where
you can make a choice.
We here are, on the other hand, solely dependant on IPy.
There are no alternatives to what we're using here at the
studio.
But even still, I think IPy is such a powerful tool that
even if Microsoft ditched
That said, there's always a possibility for Iron VB. Talk about closing
Wow. Iron VB? They shoud just call it Microsoft Lead: toxic, heavy, and
useless for making anything except those things that destroy other things
(bullets, or VB Applications).
--
-
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Max Yaffe maxya...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been reading the buzz around Microsoft's reduced commitment to Iron*
languages and wondering if I should rethink my own commitment to
IronPython.
I think you're panicking prematurely. It sounds like the IronRuby team
12 matches
Mail list logo
