On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 14:06, Doug Blank wrote:
> I'm using the following C# code as a replacement for "ipy.exe
> myscript.py". One reason for doing this is that this can be run in the
> background on Unix/Mac OSX under Mono, whereas ipy.exe can not. I
> don't know if there are other reasons, or
I'm using the following C# code as a replacement for "ipy.exe
myscript.py". One reason for doing this is that this can be run in the
background on Unix/Mac OSX under Mono, whereas ipy.exe can not. I
don't know if there are other reasons, or if there are speed
differences.
However, my FullFrames is
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Vernon Cole wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
>> I need a solution for general installs. Perhaps a stand-alone Mono
>> 2.10 install will work, if I can't build IronPython 2.7 on Mono 2.10,
>> and then run with Mono 2.6.7...
>
> I think t
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
> I need a solution for general installs. Perhaps a stand-alone Mono
> 2.10 install will work, if I can't build IronPython 2.7 on Mono 2.10,
> and then run with Mono 2.6.7...
I think that the http://apebox.org/wordpress/linux/370/ link will end
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
> I'm not too concerned about ipy.exe itself, but about being about to
> use the dlls.
>
> I'm trying to verify that the IronPython 2.7 dlls absolutely need Mono
> 2.8 or later. If that is true, I'll have to stay with IronPython 2.6
> until the r
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Vernon Cole wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Markus Schaber
> wrote:
>> Doug Blank wrote:
>>
>>> > IronPython 2.7 and newer seem to need at least .NET 4.0, which needs
>>> > at least Mono 2.8.
>>>
>>> Is that you need Mono 2.8 to build IronPython, or to
Thanks! My codeplex ID is the same as my google ID: vernondcole
(on sourceforge I confuse people by using my amateur radio call "kf7xm")
-- P.S.
I misstated the version number of LTS mono in my recent epistle.
It is 2.6.7-3.
--
Vernon
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> Vernon, i
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Doug Blank wrote:
>
>> > IronPython 2.7 and newer seem to need at least .NET 4.0, which needs
>> > at least Mono 2.8.
>>
>> Is that you need Mono 2.8 to build IronPython, or to run it?
>> IronPython2.6 beta 2 is running fine under Mono 2.6.7
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> docs.ironpython.net?
> Might I suggest sphinx-quickstart as the first command to run.
That's kinda what I'm leaning towards, preferably hosted on
readthedocs.com. Most of the docs are already ReST so using sphinx
should be easy. As always, it
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:24, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
> > Is there a place on IronPython's codeplex site that we could document
> > this information?
> >
> > Currently, there are many assumptions on:
> >
> >
> http://ironpython.codeplex.com/wikipag
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
> Is there a place on IronPython's codeplex site that we could document
> this information?
>
> Currently, there are many assumptions on:
>
> http://ironpython.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Respository%20Instructions&referringTitle=Home
> http://iro
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
> I went to Codeplex to see about updating Pyjama [1] to use the latest
> IronPython and IronRuby, but had some issues:
>
> 1) There are only two downloads for 2.7: msi and a zip of binaries.
> Shouldn't there be a zip of sources? Or a note how ho
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
>> Is that you need Mono 2.8 to build IronPython, or to run it?
>> IronPython2.6 beta 2 is running fine under Mono 2.6.7.
>
> IronPython 2.7 requires .NET 4 (to build and run). Mono 2.10 is
>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Doug Blank wrote:
> Is that you need Mono 2.8 to build IronPython, or to run it?
> IronPython2.6 beta 2 is running fine under Mono 2.6.7.
IronPython 2.7 requires .NET 4 (to build and run). Mono 2.10 is
probably your best bet.
- Jeff
__
Doug Blank wrote:
> > IronPython 2.7 and newer seem to need at least .NET 4.0, which needs
> > at least Mono 2.8.
>
> Is that you need Mono 2.8 to build IronPython, or to run it?
> IronPython2.6 beta 2 is running fine under Mono 2.6.7.
As far as I can see, you need .NET 4 / Mono 2.8 for both com
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Hi, Doug,
>
> Doug Blank wrote:
>
>> 2) I tried the zipped binaries on Mono 2.6.7 under Ubuntu 10.10, but
> that
>> doesn't look like it is supported:
>
> IronPython 2.7 and newer seem to need at least .NET 4.0, which needs at
> least Mono 2
Hi, Doug,
Doug Blank wrote:
> 2) I tried the zipped binaries on Mono 2.6.7 under Ubuntu 10.10, but
that
> doesn't look like it is supported:
IronPython 2.7 and newer seem to need at least .NET 4.0, which needs at
least Mono 2.8.
Best regards
Markus Schaber
_
I've just been through the same thing. Stop where you are and wait until I
send more information. The short answer is : you cannot build IPy on a stock
Ubuntu or Debian system. I just got a lead on a way to install mono 2.10
beside the stock 2.6.3. If you attempt to replace the patched Debian mono
I went to Codeplex to see about updating Pyjama [1] to use the latest
IronPython and IronRuby, but had some issues:
1) There are only two downloads for 2.7: msi and a zip of binaries.
Shouldn't there be a zip of sources? Or a note how how to get them?
2) I tried the zipped binaries on Mono 2.6.7
19 matches
Mail list logo
