Which of the following is considered more acceptable in the Python/IronPython
community?
Prefacing the method with:
@staticmethod
or following the method with:
MyMethod = staticmethod(MyMethod)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Static-methods-tf2327398.html#a6474908
Sent
Is this an acceptable way to simulate the type of namespace you'd define in
C#, VB, etc?
class SimulatedNamespace:
class SomeClass(object):
It seems to work ok in my tests, but is there some pitfall to doing this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Simulat
by hand:
>
> x[0,1,2] = 2
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Anton
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:15 AM
> To: users@lists.ironpython.com
> Subject: [IronPython] Arrays in IronPython
>
>
>
Is there a way to declare external API functions (non-assembly based) called
from Python code?
e.g., in VB, you'd do something like declare the following stub:
Private Declare Function FriendlyName Lib "kernel32" Alias
"ActualAPIFunctionName"(ByVal SomeString As String) As Integer
e.g., in C#, y
After a lot of googling on this, I'm still confused about .NET arrays (not
Python lists) in IronPython.
One dimensional arrays are clear:
foo = Array[int] ((1,2))
But how to set up jagged arrays and multidimensional arrays?
I know that IronPython is happy with the following (i.e., no error), but
I'm new to IronPyton (and Python in general).
Where can I find a good reference or spec for IronPython?
I'd like to find information on whether the following is available in
IronPython (google has been of limited help so far in the following
searches):
- conditional compilation
- attributes (e.g.
