Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 3:09 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] [python] Re: Another trivial bug
>
> Dino Viehland wrote:
>
>> Do you mean the hacky static compilation which lets you create real .NET
>> types or the pyc pre-compile suppo
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 3:09 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] [python] Re: Another trivial bug
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Do you mean the hacky static compilation which lets you create real .NET
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:55 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] [python] Re: Another trivial bug
>
> That's great! Once you have added static compilati
Foord
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 2:55 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] [python] Re: Another trivial bug
That's great! Once you have added static compilation back into IP 2 we
might be able to start using it at Resolver. :-)
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
That's great! Once you have added static compilation back into IP 2 we
might be able to start using it at Resolver. :-)
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
Dino Viehland wrote:
> It won't be this week: we have a lot more than 1 week of work to do - both
> Tomas and I are working on hosting thi
