Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

cussion of IronPython; Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 I recall this was a matter of some debate in the past, so I wasn't quite sure if it was *worth* adding :) Of course, MSI was a big debate in the past as well... __

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

11:57 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 As with all feature requests, please add it to CodePlex. :) On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Keith J. Farmer wrote: Since there's an MSI now, could we hope for updates/new-major-versions v

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

r 10, 2008 1:19 PM > *To:* Discussion of IronPython > *Cc:* python-announce-l...@python.org > *Subject:* [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 > > > > Hello Python Community, > > > > The IronPython and Dynamic Language Runtime teams are proud to announce the > r

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dave Fugate Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:19 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Cc: python-announce-l...@python.org Subject: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Hello Python Community, The IronPython and Dynamic Language Runtime teams

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

rvice (including dependency tracking and such). I wonder if that's gone anywhere? From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com on behalf of Bill Chiles Sent: Thu 12/11/2008 12:03 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

sers-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Andy.Tao Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:34 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 good news, thanks for yours' hard working... I noticed that the binary package haven't contain the help docum

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

We don't support this in IronPython 2.0, no. And oddly, no one seems to have added this as a "desired feature" in CodePlex, even though it's come up a few times before on this list. The most likely way that we'd initially provide support for this is to let you override the "CLS backing class" that

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

Excuse me if this is known or not, but searching around has only turned up articles/mailing lists posts that are two years old, but does IronPython 2.0 support .NET attributes yet? I've seen some examples of doing it using stub classes in C# and then deriving from the in Python, but I'm not sure i

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

的，凡事都要有个规矩！ -- Original -- From: "Dave Fugate"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2008 05:19 AM To: "Discussion of IronPython"; Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Subject: [IronPython] Announcing Iron

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

Thirded, well done to all! James Matthews wrote: I agree, I am now downloading and installing it!! On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Congratulations to everyone who made it happen. That's fantastic news :)

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

I agree, I am now downloading and installing it!! On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Sylvain Hellegouarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Congratulations to everyone who made it happen. That's fantastic news :) > > - Sylvain > > Dave Fugate a écrit : > >> >> Hello Python Community, >> >> The IronPytho

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

Congratulations to everyone who made it happen. That's fantastic news :) - Sylvain Dave Fugate a écrit : Hello Python Community, The IronPython and Dynamic Language Runtime teams are proud to announce the release of IronPython 2.0 final. IronPython 2.0 is the culmination of nearly two years

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0

Hello Python Community, The IronPython and Dynamic Language Runtime teams are proud to announce the release of IronPython 2.0 final. IronPython 2.0 is the culmination of nearly two years worth of work resulting in a CPython 2.5 compatible release on .NET 2.0 SP1. By far, the biggest change to

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 RC2

Congratulations and "Well Done" to the Iron Python team! This release has taken Iron Python from an experimental curiosity to a viable work engine (IMHO). I ran my test suite and found only one remaining restriction -- Binary data cannot be passed as a parameter. (The same error shows up four time

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 RC2

Hello IronPython community, Since we released IronPython 2.0 RC1, there have been some major blocking bugs reported in the mailing list. We have fixed 7 of them and are releasing IronPython 2.0 RC2. We expect to release the final version in less than two weeks barring any more major blocking b

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

I think this says it all = Duck Typing, Tuple, Open Class, method_missing .. class C { public dynamic myField; public dynamic MyProp { get; set; } public dynamic MyMethod(dynamic d) { return d.Foo(); } public delegate dynamic MyDelegate(dynamic d); } and this IDyn

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Hmm..is there any hosted VPC made available? I'm based in Cairo and a 23GB download will probably tie up the whole bandwidth of Africa. Dody G. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Watch the the videos from the PDC, once they're posted. I know that some >

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Tim Roberts wrote: On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:36:05 +0200, "Dody Gunawinata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yup. It looks like more information needed on all of these dynamic features. In the first glance it looks like C# 4.0 is turning into VB 6 :) Are you saying that would be a bad thin

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Watch the the videos from the PDC, once they're posted. I know that some of your questions about use of DynamicObject from within C# are answered by Jim Hugunin's talk. Also, if you can download the 23 GB(!) VPC image with the Visual Studio 2010 CTP, you'll be able to try the walkthroughs -- and

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

I'd call it missed opportunity if what C# 4.0 dynamic does is only to provide the same facilities that VB6 or VB.Net have provided long time ago. For example, the COM interop thing is nice, but then for the past 8 years you know that if you want to script some Office or COM objects you don't use C#

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

ind Dynamic / DynamicObject to be more useful for doing >>>> simple method-missing style calls. IDynamicObject gives you a lot of power >>>> you might not need – but then again you can do some pretty cool things with >>>> it too. >>>> >>>>

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:36:05 +0200, "Dody Gunawinata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup. It looks like more information needed on all of these dynamic features. > In the first glance it looks like C# 4.0 is turning into VB 6 :) > Are you saying that would be a bad thing? Let us recall that VB

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

es you a lot of power >>> you might not need – but then again you can do some pretty cool things with >>> it too. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dody Gunawinata >>> *Sent

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

ith >> it too. >> >> >> >> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dody Gunawinata >> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2008 3:13 PM >> *To:* Discussion of IronPython >> *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

nday, October 27, 2008 3:13 PM > *To:* Discussion of IronPython > *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP > > > > Although it looks like IDynamicObject looks like C# equivalent of > method_missing. > Now that's something to celebrate. > &

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Gunawinata Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:13 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP Although it looks like IDynamicObject looks like C# equivalent of method_missing. Now that's something to celebrate. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:02 AM,

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Although it looks like IDynamicObject looks like C# equivalent of method_missing. Now that's something to celebrate. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Dody Gunawinata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Is it me or is C# 4.0 feature list so far is underwhelming? (I know, it's a > wrong list) > > On Mon,

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Is it me or is C# 4.0 feature list so far is underwhelming? (I know, it's a wrong list) On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Srivatsn Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello IronPython Community, > > > > This is a special release of IronPython designed to work with the Visual > Studio 2010 > CT

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

For those curious about the dynamic feature, here's a code snippet that demonstrates using IronPython from C# 4: ScriptRuntime py = Python.CreateRuntime(); dynamic random = py.UseFile("random.py"); var items = Enumerable.Range(1, 7).ToArray(); random.shuffle(items); (This references the shuffle fu

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 VS10 CTP

Hello IronPython Community, This is a special release of IronPython designed to work with the Visual Studio 2010 CTP. This release will let you try out C# 4.0's new Dynamic feature, which allows you to easily call

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Many congratulations to the IP team on this release! We should be able to start the process of properly porting Resolver One to IP 2.0 RC1 in a week or so (we're just finishing off a release of our own), but we've been tracking the betas up until now (as you might have noticed from Michael Foo

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Release Candidate 1 - Documentation

ng no major issues are discovered in RC1. Thanks, The IronPython Team From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Srivatsn Narayanan Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1:56 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Release Candidate 1

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Release Candidate 1

Hello IronPython Community, We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.0 Release Candidate 1. We have fixed around 40 bugs since the previous beta. There have been more than 500 bug fixes since the first 2.0 alpha was announced. Apart from the bug fixes these items have also been add

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4

, August 06, 2008 3:10 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4 Curt Hagenlocher wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: include sqlite3 Python Standard Library, but can't support sqlite3

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4

other words, I've got more lawyers to talk to. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 3:10 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4 Curt Hagenloch

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4

Curt Hagenlocher wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: include sqlite3 Python Standard Library, but can't support sqlite3 We haven't removed the modules that aren't expected to be supported in the final version of IronPython 2.0. Including the s

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Kevin Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > include sqlite3 Python Standard Library, but can't support sqlite3 We haven't removed the modules that aren't expected to be supported in the final version of IronPython 2.0. -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4

include sqlite3 Python Standard Library*,* but* *can't support sqlite3* * On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Srivatsn Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello IronPython Community, > > > > I'm pleased to announce IronPython 2.0 *Beta4*. We have fixed around 50 > bugs(~45 of them reported on Codep

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta4

Hello IronPython Community, I'm pleased to announce IronPython 2.0 Beta4. We have fixed around 50 bugs(~45 of them reported on Codeplex and ~5 reported internally). Apart from these bug fixes, the following are the highlights of this release: * This release ships with a MSI installer th

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

Congratulations, guys! We'll build Resolver One against it and let you know what breaks :-) Regards, Giles Srivatsn Narayanan wrote: Hello IronPython Community, I'm pleased to announce IronPython 2.0 *Beta 3*. We have fixed around 34 bugs in this release (~16 of them reported on Code

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Srivatsn Narayanan Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:15 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 By tools and templates you mean the 'script' folder in the sdlsd

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

ED] [mailto:users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Srivatsn Narayanan > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:15 AM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 > > By tools and templates you mean the 'script' folder in the sdlsdk

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

TECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 11:07 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 Srivatsn Narayanan wrote: > That's a nearly but no :) A few checkins were made to IPy/DLR in the two days. > Ok - thanks.

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

55 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 Srivatsn Narayanan wrote: This build was snapped two days after the sdlsdk build. Hehe. Is that a yes or a no... it sounds like a 'nearly'. :-) Michael -Original Message---

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

hael Foord > Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 3:51 AM > To: Discussion of IronPython > Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 > > Hey guys. > > Are the binaries for Silverlight in this release the *same* as the ones > available in the Silverlight Dynamic Langua

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

14, 2008 3:51 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 Hey guys. Are the binaries for Silverlight in this release the *same* as the ones available in the Silverlight Dynamic Languages SDK - or are they more up to date? Thanks Michael Foord

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

This build was snapped two days after the sdlsdk build. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 3:51 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3 Hey guys

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

Hey guys. Are the binaries for Silverlight in this release the *same* as the ones available in the Silverlight Dynamic Languages SDK - or are they more up to date? Thanks Michael Foord Srivatsn Narayanan wrote: Hello IronPython Community, I’m pleased to announce IronPython 2.0 *Beta 3*.

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

Congratulations guys! Many thanks. Onto 1.1.2 next... :-) I've just finished chapter 14 of IronPython in Action. The next chapter is the last one, and is on embedding IronPython. I've been looking forward to writing this. The chances of seeing the book finished in my lifetime are increasing..

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta3

Hello IronPython Community, I'm pleased to announce IronPython 2.0 Beta 3. We have fixed around 34 bugs in this release (~16 of them reported on Codeplex and ~18 reported internally). Apart from the bug fixes, this release contains the following improvements: * We have worked on perf -

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

This is the expected behavior. CreateScriptSourceFromString(string) defaults to SourceCodeKind.Expression (ScriptEngine.cs) -- public ScriptSource/*!*/ CreateScriptSourceFromString(string/*!*/ code) { ContractUtils.RequiresNotNull(code, "code");

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

maybe that is a bug: the detail as follow: private void btnExecute_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { ScriptRuntimeSetup runtimeSetup = new ScriptRuntimeSetup(true); ScriptRuntime ScriptRuntime = ScriptRuntime.Create(runtimeSetup); ScriptRuntime.GlobalOption

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

... which was fixed in the last half hour or so, I see. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith J. Farmer Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 10:50 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

7; could not be opened ('Unspecified error ') IronPython Error 5 Source file 'C:\Users\kfarmer\Workspace\Sandbox\IronPython_Main\Src\IronPython\Runti me\Types\UserType.cs' could not be opened ('Unspecified error ') IronPython -Original Message- Fr

Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

w00t! I wonder if all my hosting samples are broken... :-) Michael Dave Fugate wrote: > > Hello IronPython Community, > > We’re pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.0 Beta 2. In > addition to the usual bug fixes (~25 reported on CodePlex and ~50 > reported internally), this release

[IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.0 Beta 2

Hello IronPython Community, We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.0 Beta 2. In addition to the usual bug fixes (~25 reported on CodePlex and ~50 reported internally), this release has been partially focused on improving the performance of IronPython, in particular startup perf.