Re: [IronPython] Exec Question

2005-12-19 Thread Martin Maly
om Subject: [IronPython] Exec Question Tanks for the clarification, Martin. As my planned application depends essentially on dynamic code execution at run-time, any information you may have as to priority and expected release for this bug fix would be appreciated. If you have a patch that I coul

[IronPython] Exec Question

2005-12-16 Thread Tibor Berkovits
Tanks for the clarification, Martin. As my planned application depends essentially on dynamic code execution at run-time, any information you may have as to priority and expected release for this bug fix would be appreciated. If you have a patch that I could apply to the sources, while waiting fo

Re: [IronPython] Exec Question

2005-12-14 Thread Martin Maly
> exec "a=12" in glob, loc >>> loc {'a': 12} Seems that we have introduced bug in 0.9.6 Thanks! Martin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tibor Berkovits Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:39 AM To: u

[IronPython] Exec Question

2005-12-14 Thread Tibor Berkovits
The following python code snippet glob = {} loc = {} exec "a=12" in glob, loc behaves differently under IP 0.9.5 vs. IP 0.9.6 with respect to which dictionary the definition of 'a' is inserted into. In IP095 it goes to loc, while in IP096 it goes to glob. Can someone please explain which one is