Re: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance

2008-09-29 Thread Dino Viehland
D] On Behalf Of Ronnie Maor Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 12:16 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance thanks for the help. I tried both suggestions, but unfortunately it didn't change anything. I now use a benchmark that builds a typical setup and t

Re: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance

2008-09-29 Thread Ronnie Maor
ariables: > > > > source.Compile().Execute(mainScope); > > > > Not sure if that's the case anymore, but it's worth a try. > > > > ~js > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Ronnie Maor > *Sent:* Satu

Re: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance

2008-09-28 Thread Dino Viehland
Behalf Of Jimmy Schementi Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 1:32 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance Make that last line call compile and see if it helps. When the Silverlight integration was written that gave a 4x speedup when using top-level functions

Re: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance

2008-09-28 Thread Jimmy Schementi
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronnie Maor Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 11:22 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: [IronPython] IPyb5 performance Hi all, I've finally managed to get my code running correctly under IPy2b5 - thanks everyone who helped! I'm now lef

[IronPython] IPyb5 performance

2008-09-27 Thread Ronnie Maor
Hi all, I've finally managed to get my code running correctly under IPy2b5 - thanks everyone who helped! I'm now left with a performance problem. My code seems to run roughly 2 times slower: * infra tests regressed from 19 seconds in IPy 1.1.1 to 33 seconds in IPy2b5 * application level tests reg