Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-13 Thread M. David Peterson
Getting closer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Src]$ mono -V Mono JIT compiler version 1.2.4 (/trunk/ r77328) Copyright (C) 2002-2007 Novell, Inc and Contributors. www.mono-project.com TLS: __thread GC:Included Boehm (with typed GC) SIGSEGV: normal Archi

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-11 Thread M. David Peterson
BTW... for those keeping score, as Seo proclaimed, IP 2.0A1 will now successfully build on Mono (SVN r77275). I have my doubts the stacktrace will be all that useful to anyone, but you never know, so for what its worth, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debug]$ mono ipy.exe Stacktrace: at (wrapper managed-t

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-11 Thread M. David Peterson
Do I understand correctly: IP 2.0, and therefore the DLR, will now compile on Mono, and as such, it is now possible to begin the process of trying to break it? This would be fantastic! :D (/me is building Mono from SVN, hopes to have successfully built IP 2.0 soon thereafter...) On 5/11/07, San

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-11 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
2007/5/2, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here's my first try on building IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono: > https://fepy.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fepy/trunk/patches/2.0a1/ > (snip) Mono revision later than 77232 compiles IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 without any modifications besides makefile pat

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-06 Thread Joe Mason
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:13:16PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote: > Actually, this "128 properties" bug is fixed in Mono SVN, so I didn't > experience this. Well, I guess just I wasted a bunch of my time, then... I just finished building mono from SVN, and I think I now get the same patch you do. >

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-06 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
Patch repository: https://fepy.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fepy/trunk/patches/2.0a1/ 2007/5/7, Joe Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Looks like Mono has a limit of 128 properties per object, (...) Thanks a *lot* for investigating this! Actually, this "128 properties" bug is fixed in Mono SVN, so I di

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-06 Thread Joe Mason
Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After these, gmcs crashes inside Mono runtime with backtrace pointing > to custom attribute resolution. Still investigating, but above three > patches should help anyone trying to dig this on their own together > with me. :) The crash I'm getting is: *

[IronPython] IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono

2007-05-02 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
Here's my first try on building IronPython 2.0 Alpha 1 on Mono: https://fepy.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fepy/trunk/patches/2.0a1/ First, get Mono from SVN, revision later than 76552. Because of an oversight, Mono's C# compiler (actually parser) didn't allow attributes in parameters of operator me