Re: [IronPython] Mercurial Status

2009-05-06 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote: Ok, I do have a fix for this and the other issues - I'm just waiting for a code review then I'll check it in.  If we do f.write(buffer('foo')) where f was opened as a binary file we'll write out b'foo' and not

Re: [IronPython] Mercurial Status

2009-05-05 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote: You mention bug #22258 - is Mercurial using byte array notation wherever they intend to have a non-Unicode string? Turns out, I thought buffers == byte arrays, but apparently they're not. I also managed to mix up changes

Re: [IronPython] Mercurial Status

2009-05-05 Thread Dino Viehland
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:58 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Mercurial Status On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote: You mention bug #22258 - is Mercurial using byte array notation wherever they intend to have a non-Unicode

Re: [IronPython] Mercurial Status

2009-05-04 Thread Dino Viehland
...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 12:24 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: [IronPython] Mercurial Status I've been testing IronPython with Mercurial. Using the 2.6 nightlies as the base, lots of it will just work. (Make sure you grab zlib from http

[IronPython] Mercurial Status

2009-05-02 Thread Jeff Hardy
I've been testing IronPython with Mercurial. Using the 2.6 nightlies as the base, lots of it will just work. (Make sure you grab zlib from http://cid-414fa1a9bd174b4b.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Public/IronPython.Zlib.zip). The attached patch moves things a little further on. Also, you'll need to