uld work well. Given the huge difference in the runtimes 10-20
>> random stack traces during the running of the program might be enough to
>> figure it out.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Wilfredo Lugo
>&
at would work well. Given the huge difference in the runtimes 10-20
> random stack traces during the running of the program might be enough to
> figure it out.
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Wilfredo Lugo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, Novembe
: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:24 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
I set the ModuleBuiltins compiler option but the behavior is the same. The
only difference from the command line is that I am calling a python function
from the DLR, and on the comm
L PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Wilfredo Lugo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:16 PM
>
> *To:* Discussion of IronPython
> *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
>
>
>
> Thanks. Performance improved, but still over two minutes. Here i
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilfredo Lugo
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:16 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
Thanks. Performance improved, but still over two minutes. Here is the latest
code:
static void Main(str
lerOptions,
> and then do options.Module |= ModuleOptions.Optimized; Finally do
> source.Compile(options) and then it should give you the optimized code.
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Wilfredo Lugo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilfredo Lugo
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:45 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
Thanks!.
I was able to get the default scope from CompiledCode, but I am still getting
the same performance. Here is the latest
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Wilfredo Lugo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:25 AM
> *To:* Discussion of IronPython
>
> *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> But
: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:25 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
Thanks.
But then If I don't use my defined scope, how I could fill my function delegate?
Right now I am using :
Microsoft.Func func =
scope.GetVariable>("interpolate_s
gt;
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Wilfredo Lugo
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:29 AM
> *To:* users@lists.ironpython.com
> *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
>
>
>
>
>
> I run the script directl
at the command line.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilfredo Lugo
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 9:29 AM
To: users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Performance Issue
I run the script directly from ipy.exe and it basically behaves pretty similar
to
ists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com>] On
Behalf Of Wilfredo Lugo
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 8:32 AM
To: users at lists.ironpython.com
<http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com>
Subject: [IronPython] Performance Issue
_
8:32 AM
To: users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: [IronPython] Performance Issue
Hi All,
I have a Python interpolation script which basically reads data from a file and
perform a linear interpolation of the data present on the file. I have been
using this script for some time. Right now I am wo
Hi All,
I have a Python interpolation script which basically reads data from a file
and perform a linear interpolation of the data present on the file. I have
been using this script for some time. Right now I am working on a C#
application that also performs linear interpolation, so I decided to
2008/8/6 Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On my machine it is about 40% faster in 2.0 than 1.1.1 but still about 2x
> slower than CPython
I don't see this speedup on Mono. I should file a Mono perf bug.
--
Seo Sanghyeon
___
Users mailing list
User
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 3:47 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Performance issue when calling a function with **kw
2008/8/3 Asaf Kleinbort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Calling a function with **kw takes about 10 t
There is a bit of extra code that's run when there are keyword arguments,
but I don't think it should make this kind of difference. Please file a bug
report in CodePlex at http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/List.aspx.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Asaf Kleinbort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrot
2008/8/3 Asaf Kleinbort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Calling a function with **kw takes about 10 times more time than calling a
> function with a simple dictionary. The difference exists also in cpython
> but there the differences is hardly noticed.
>
> Does anyone know if this is going to improve in ve
Hi all,
I am new to this list, so I'll first introduce myself.
I am working at IT Structures (www.itstructures.com) in Israel. Our service
Is written in C#, but most of the backend implementation is written in
IronPython.
While doing performance analysis of our application, I came across the
fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
