ution for projecting them onto .NET types.
> And currently in 2.0 anything which implements IEnumerable will get an
> __iter__ method.
>
> Thanks for the reports!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo
>
ill get an __iter__ method.
Thanks for the reports!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:56 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] RPyC and IronPython
2008/5/22 Ronnie Ma
2008/5/22 Ronnie Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2) id(obj) in IPy returns System.Int64, which unfortunately doesn't pickle
> out of the box, since it's not a python native type.
This is clearly a bug. Actually, there already is a CodePlex issue,
but it is mistitled.
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython
I'm trying to use RPyC (http://rpyc.wikispaces.com), which is a great
package for "generic remote control" of remote processes.
it basically works, except for small changes I needed to make due to
outstanding IPy incompatiblities. wanted to let people know in case you also
want to use it (it's rea
