it in
another.
It also follows, then, that you also should state the experimental conditions
when you quote the numbers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Michael Foord
Sent: Thu 8/14/2008 1:54 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] spee
David Jensen wrote:
I would like to know if I write python standard programs and compile them into
an exe using IP1 or IP2, how much faster would it be than standard python.
Also, how much faster is interpreted IP1 or IP2 than standard python running
as an interpreter?
Try it and find out
I would like to know if I write python standard programs and compile them into
an exe using IP1 or IP2, how much faster would it be than standard python.
Also, how much faster is interpreted IP1 or IP2 than standard python running
as an interpreter?
David Jensen
__
"test.py is the actual benchmark, and the other one is the actual benchmark. The code for both is at the end of this message"Should read "test.py is the actual benchmark. The code for both is at the end of this message"
___
users mailing list
users@lis
An issue on CodePlex -
http://www.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPython&WorkItemId=651 - was raised on my behalf to do with performance using BeautifulSoup (a forgiving HTML parser).
Here's a simple test which does the parsing and the "prettifying" - the process where BeautifulSou
Yes the speed improvement in RC1 is much appreciated. I am doing an
IronPython presentation at the Sydney Python User Group tomorrow
evening, and was expecting negative comments about IronPython Console
launch time. RC1 has given a 2.5 speedup. Thanks.
Mark
On 7/26/06, Luis M. Gonzalez <[EMAIL PR
>> The only additional thing that I would have liked to see here
would be a more complete description of the machine and version of .NET and
IronPython that you were running against.
Hi Jim,
This is how I run this script:
IronPython 1.0.60712 (Beta) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
(this is Beta 9)
I
end = time.clock()
print 'ran %s in \t%.2f seconds' % (func.__name__, end-start)
tests = [test_pystone, test_call, test_add, test_replace, test_range, test_eval]
L = range(N)
for i in range(2):
for test in tests:
bench(test, L)
-
27;seconds. --\n')
>>> cn.test('E:\\machine_All.txt')
('-- test took', '0.06', 'seconds. --\n')
>>>
sum = .60
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoeSox
> Sent: Tue
Hi everyone,
I'd like to ask you a question about Ironpython's
speed and performance:
I imagine that so far, you've been
concentrated in completeness and compatibility more than performance, and I
guess you'll address this issue after verion 1.0.
However, and although you claimed that Iro
I finally achieved some spare time to get MIT's ConceptNet 2.1 to run
using IronPython. I decided just to modify some of the files included
with the 2.1 distribution and copy them; placing them in another
directory to acheive execution in IronPython. Just to get it to run
the first time, I create
hon
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Speed test
Just for kicks and giggles (not sure if its helpful but it is interesting, at
least to me) here is a speed test using beta4 thru beta8, I ran them one after
the other and posted the results below.
But a short recap revealed that beta5 and 6 ran th
Just for kicks and giggles (not sure if its helpful but it is
interesting, at least to me) here is a speed test using beta4 thru
beta8, I ran them one after the other and posted the results below.
But a short recap revealed that beta5 and 6 ran the fastest using
IronPythonConsole.exe. I am not rea
dle a large number of method
signatures).
But we still have a ways to go...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoeSox
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 7:13 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Speed test
ok, retested using beta6:
C# previ
ok, retested using beta6:
C# previously referenced in this thread button4_Click() test: {.1875,
.078125, .078125, .062500, .078125}
sum = 0.484375
beats the previous beta5 sum of .608
IronPythonConsole test(file): {.03, .06, .05, .14, .05}*
sum = .33
2nd run (new IronPythonConsole instance)
{.17
I completed one more IronPythonConsole.exe test. I added the below
method to CNUDB.py
===
def test(self,thefile):
time1=time.time()
self.load_predicates_file(thefile)
time2=time.time()
print "-- test took",str(round(time2-time1,2)),'seconds. --\n'
===
The resul
It was late for me when I composed this last night. So some
corrections are in order...
> On 4/19/06, JoeSox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Results from IDLE 1.1.2
> > ran 5 times = {.03, .03, .03, .05, .03} seconds
> > sum = .008
> >
sum = .17
> > Results from Wing IDE 2.1
> > r
Ok, I had enough time to test this in IronPythonConsole.exe
IronPython 1.0.2280 (Beta) on .NET 2.0.50727.42
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> import sys,time
>>> sys.path.append('E:\\')
>>> import CNUDB
>>> file = 'E:\\machine_All.txt'
>>> def test(thefile):
...
On 4/19/06, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've opened a bug in our internal database to track the issue. I'm not sure
> when we'll get to looking at it just yet as it may be somewhat of an involved
> investigation. But at least we won't forget about it.
>
> If you could give us som
eSox
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Speed test
On 4/19/06, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If in initializeDB you comment out:
>
>
> ipEngine1.SetVariable("pred_file", predfile);
On 4/19/06, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If in initializeDB you comment out:
>
>
> ipEngine1.SetVariable("pred_file", predfile);
>ipEngine1.Execute(@"db.load_predicates_file(pred_file)");
>
> does it get much faster?
Yes, I received a time of 00:0
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoeSox
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:41 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Speed test
On 4/19/06, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interop w/ C# shouldn't really cost you that much - it should actually be
> able to gi
On 4/19/06, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interop w/ C# shouldn't really cost you that much - it should actually be
> able to give you speed gains as you fall back into the static world...
>
> Do you know if most of the time is being spent in the XmlTextReader or in
> IronPython afte
t.com/careers/search/details.aspx?JobID=6D4754DE-11F0-45DF-8B78-DC1B43134038)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoeSox
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:34 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Speed test
Thanks Dino fo
On 4/18/06, Srinivasa Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Srinivasa Rao.
It actually read "00:04:40.4845"
Sorry, I possibly typed it in a confusing way.
--
Joseph
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://
I don't know
Thanks & Regards
Srinivasa Rao.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of JoeSox
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:08 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Speed test
On 4/18/06, JoeSox <[EMAIL PROTE
On 4/18/06, JoeSox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My C# Method clocks in at 4:40.4845
I suppose I need to clarify that is meant to read 4 minutes 40 seconds
--
Joseph
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.c
> of the clock.
>
>
> Do you want to help develop Dynamic languages on CLR?
> (http://members.microsoft.com/careers/search/details.aspx?JobID=6D4754DE-11F0-45DF-8B78-DC1B43134038)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JoeSox
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 8:07 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] Speed test
Am I doing this speed test correctly using the script and process below?
I have unpp.py on a usb j
Am I doing this speed test correctly using the script and process below?
I have unpp.py on a usb jumpdrive E
---
#unpp.py
import time
def unpp(pp):
time1=time.clock()
toks = pp.strip(' ()\n').split()
pred = toks[0]
args = ' '.join(toks[1:])[1:-1].split('" "')
f,i = map(lam
30 matches
Mail list logo
