A small question. I assume .net support for dynamic languages, interpreters,
reflection was not in .net 1.0. Microsoft started as a compiler company and
I thought Bill Gates was strongly in favor of interpreted languages. I thought
it was odd that Microsoft apparently did not supply interpreted l
On 10/24/07, David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A small question. I assume .net support for dynamic languages,
> interpreters,
> reflection was not in .net 1.0. Microsoft started as a compiler company
> and
> I thought Bill Gates was strongly in favor of interpreted languages. I
> though
1. I asked for them back in the 1980s. But I am only one bleeding
edge Ph.D. CS guy, so no one listens to me.
2. I am impressed with the current level of Visual Basic support
(which, while not being as dynamic as Python, does have late binding).
Is there a roadmap as to when and how de
While reflection was there one thing that was missing is good dynamic code
generation support. We got that in v2.0 in the form of DynamicMethods. That
lets us spin up little snippets of code that are fully collectible by the GC so
it really enables a lot of scenarios that were difficult or pai
Hello,
Is there a list of python built-in modules that are NOT supported by
IronPython? I just tried importing sqlite3 module and failed.
Thanks,
--
Kelie
___
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-
It's pretty easy to get the list:
IronPython console: IronPython 2.0 (2.0.0.00) on .NET 2.0.50727.1408
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> import sys
>>> sys.builtin_module_names
('__builtin__', 'datetime', 'errno', 'math', 'md5', 're', 'collections',
'select', 'cStringI
Hello all,
I've uploaded the download code with a slightly improved version. Thanks
to Seo it now supports passing keyword arguments to the hosted CPython
functions/methods.
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ironpython/cpython_extensions.shtml
Thanks
Michael
http://www.manning.com/foord
Michael F
2007/10/25, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> While reflection was there one thing that was missing is good dynamic code
> generation support. We got that in v2.0 in the form of DynamicMethods.
> That lets us spin up little snippets of code that are fully collectible by
> the GC so it really en
2007/10/25, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And the only one of these that we currently implement is select. Note this
> is on ipy v2.0 but I believe currently v1.1 and v2.0 have the same set of
> built-in modules.
They do, with the addition of array module in 2.0 Alpha 5.
--
Seo Sanghye
Yeah, it took me a long time to port that to 2.0... And unfortunately there's
also still one regression in it vs. v1.1 (from the std lib tests) - subtyping
array.array, overriding __getitem__, and calling the base class when __slots__
is defined on the sub-type is broken. And that's true for a
10 matches
Mail list logo
