Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1

2009-03-29 Thread cur...@acm.org
Intellisense is a cosmetic feature at best. It's obviously nice to have, but it can't actually be *that* important to anyone...it's not like the information isn't available via other means. 2009/3/29 Howland-Rose, Kyle > Hi Adam, > > About "intellisense is not a major blocker for iron python a

Re: [IronPython] Main Utility of IronPython?

2009-04-11 Thread cur...@acm.org
I guess I don't really have a primary usage other than tinkering around, mostly. I'm looking to change that, though; my company has a great need for automated testing on one of our GUI applications, something I suspect others are probably in need of in environments like ours (C/C++ servers, C# GUI

Re: [IronPython] Compiling IronPythonConsole.exe

2009-05-06 Thread cur...@acm.org
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:53, Andrew Evans wrote: > Hello list I am new here :-) > > I am trying to figure out how to get IronPythonConsole.exe as I need it for > Pyreadline... I am using 2.01 version of IronPython > > I have tried compiling from source to but to no avail. Is IronPythonConsole >

Re: [IronPython] ironpython compared to powershell

2009-05-26 Thread cur...@acm.org
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 14:16, jocke khazad wrote: > So pretty much, there is no real advantage of using python more then in a > religious point of view? > > Can you code powershell to control/automatise linux servers for example? An > advantage could be to work with a language that works on any

Re: [IronPython] Minor bug in conversion of str to bytes?

2009-05-29 Thread cur...@acm.org
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 13:33, Michael Foord wrote: > Dino Viehland wrote: > >> Unfortunately there's probably going to continue to be a bunch of corner >> cases related to bytes/str/unicode until we move to 3.0. But hopefully >> we can come up w/ reasonable workarounds for most of them. >> >> In