El Martes, 21 de Abril de 2009, Brandon Armstead escribió:
> Inaki,
>
>Sorry missed the 'reply to all button'. I think what your saying makes
> sense, so simply enumerate each server:
>
> P1 - Set Flag 1
> P2 - Set Flag 2
> P3 - Set Flag 3
>
> these flags will then be written to usrloc, and up
Inaki,
Sorry missed the 'reply to all button'. I think what your saying makes
sense, so simply enumerate each server:
i.e.
P1 - Set Flag 1
P2 - Set Flag 2
P3 - Set Flag 3
these flags will then be written to usrloc, and upon lookup read from
usrloc.
In which case I can simply check this $bf
El Martes, 21 de Abril de 2009, Brandon Armstead escribió:
> Inaki,
Please, mantain the thread in the maillist.
> Thanks for the input -- that does look similar to what I'm looking to
> do, however not 100%. From looking at the RFC it looks as if there is
> always a certain path being trave
El Martes, 21 de Abril de 2009, Brandon Armstead escribió:
> Hello guys,
>
> Is there a method upon using lookup("location") to also pull out the
> "socket" information for the original location the UAC registered to, for
> scenarios of this example:
>
> P1 & P2 share same usrloc database.
>
>
Hello guys,
Is there a method upon using lookup("location") to also pull out the
"socket" information for the original location the UAC registered to, for
scenarios of this example:
P1 & P2 share same usrloc database.
UA1 registers to P1
UA2 registers to P2
UA1 calls UA2
UA1 invites -> P1
Daniel,
Thanks for your suggest,
the code has run for years, it's time to update ... thank again.
I try the code with latest 1.4x
I used to test uac_replace_from in request route then failure_route,
it makes two from hdr connect together. That's totally wrong.
If I have no replace_from in route
Hello,
kamailio does not generate ACK for 200OK reply. Are you sure it comes
from kamailio and not from somewhere else?
The best is to paste the trace of the sip call here or to some web page
where we can check the signaling.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04/21/2009 04:55 PM, kévin l'heveder wrote:
> Hi,
On 04/21/2009 04:31 PM, Gentrice's kaiser wrote:
> Dear Sir:
>
>
> I wrote a failure route for serial call mechanism, it help for no
> answer call ...
> but all these serial calls need to have a new CallerID,
> so I use replace_from for this purpose.
>
>
>
> modparam("uac","from_restore_m
2009/4/21 Gentrice's kaiser :
> see,
> you have gave me a new direction to think about this,
> I think it is work for carrier,
> so some small ITSP, most of them use "From" for identification.
They will use "From" if there is no PAI or RPID headers. Just ask your
carrier which header it requires (
see,
you have gave me a new direction to think about this,
I think it is work for carrier,
so some small ITSP, most of them use "From" for identification.
Thanks for your answer.
kaiser
在 2009/4/21 下午 11:05 時，Iñaki Baz Castillo 寫到：
> 2009/4/21 Gentrice's kaiser :
>> If only one forward number i
Hello
I am receiving the SDP from a provider with this format: g729/8000/1, which I
interpret as codec g729, sampling rate 8000 and the number of channels is 1.
The calling party [linksys pa2p] apparently does not like the "1" and
terminates the call.
I want to strip it using textops module a
2009/4/21 Gentrice's kaiser :
> If only one forward number in AVP array , this code working fine,
> the issue will happen if multiple forward number trying, ( forward
> 2nd,3rd ...number)
> the UAC module will restore from header in 200 OK of its following
> message when a UA answered,
> we will h
Hi,
i want to generate my own ACK after a OK ( After ringing).
but even if i drop the OK in my reply_route a ACK is auto generated by
Kamailio and sent
How could i prevent this behavior ??
I found some clues in the sources :
*#define no_autoack(_t_) ((_t_)->flags&T_NO_AUTOACK_FLAG)*
Dear Sir:
I wrote a failure route for serial call mechanism, it help for no
answer call ...
but all these serial calls need to have a new CallerID,
so I use replace_from for this purpose.
modparam("uac","from_restore_mode","auto")
failure_route[3]
{
log(1,"*** I'm failure_route[3
2009/4/21 shiva prasad :
> Hi All,
> I've successfully installed kamailio 1.5x version on fedora 9 os,
> could you please let me know is it possible to configure Ekiga(client)
> to connect kamailio server,.
>
> if possible, could you please let me know how to configure the client?
Please,
Hi All,
I've successfully installed kamailio 1.5x version on fedora 9 os,
could you please let me know is it possible to configure Ekiga(client)
to connect kamailio server,.
if possible, could you please let me know how to configure the client?
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Shivapr
Daniel-Constantin Mierla ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> On 04/20/2009 08:34 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>> But for a production system you usually do not want this feature.
>> Practically this paragraph from RFC 3261 is non-sense as it brakes
>> communication with SIP clients.
>>
>> Residential custom
Hello,
On 04/20/2009 08:34 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi Sandro!
>
> If you just need it for testing then you could use the approaches
> mentioned in the other emails.
>
> But for a production system you usually do not want this feature.
> Practically this paragraph from RFC 3261 is non-sense a
18 matches
Mail list logo
